Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "spismal".
Did you mean:
spismale
2012 Jun 02
2
mgcv (bam) very large standard error difference between versions 1.7-11 and 1.7-17, bug?
Dear useRs,
I reran an analysis with bam (mgcv, version 1.7-17) originally
conducted using an older version of bam (mgcv, version 1.7-11) and
this resulted in the same estimates, but much lower standard errors
(in some cases 20 times as low) and lower p-values. This obviously
results in a larger set of significant predictors. Is this result
expected given the improvements in the new version? Or