search for: spinmutex

Some updates: First, thanks so much for creating these test suites. Troubleshooting is going very quickly! > There is some flakiness in SanitizerCommon.SpinMutex test. Yes, I'm seeing that too. SpinMutexTry as well. Should these be disabled? > ARM JellyBean works over here. I found a configuration that works well on JB 4.1.2 and 4.2.2. The trick is to build the ASan *runtime* with *CMake*. If you build the runtime using the Make build, the te...

ARM JellyBean works over here. There is some flakiness in SanitizerCommon.SpinMutex test. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm following these instructions with the latest code from llvm.org: > > > https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/trunk/build/scripts/slave/buildbot_cmake.sh > >...

I'm following these instructions with the latest code from llvm.org: https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/trunk/build/scripts/slave/buildbot_cmake.sh Of SanitizerTest, AsanTest and AsanNoinstTest, I cannot get any of the 3 to pass all its tests. I've tried using an Android device running JellyBean as well as the latest Android Emulator (20130917, api level 18).

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > Some updates: > > First, thanks so much for creating these test suites. Troubleshooting > is going very quickly! > > > > There is some flakiness in SanitizerCommon.SpinMutex test. > > Yes, I'm seeing that too. SpinMutexTry as well. Should these be disabled? > There is an issue in the spinlock on ARM: it's implemented with plain non-atomic loads and stores. It seems that android ndk does not have the atomics we need for this, and we did not have time...