search for: spi15c

...e. Example of such a long file name? So we know which file name to surpress into 8.3. ( yes, CP/M file name convention legacy is still present ) > If possible, also use short names for source files too. TIA. Euh, please visit http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/conf/2015-MSR-Unix-History/html/Spi15c.html scroll down to '4 Data Uses', check the graphic, especial file name length. My point: _Why_ restrict the development system file name length? And now something completely different: > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslinux mailing list > >...

...to surpress into 8.3. >> ( yes, CP/M file name convention legacy is still present ) >> >> >> >>> If possible, also use short names for source files too. TIA. >> >> Euh, please visit http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/conf/2015-MSR-Unix-History/html/Spi15c.html >> scroll down to '4 Data Uses', check the graphic, especial file name length. >> >> My point: _Why_ restrict the development system file name length? >> > > Hehe, OK, I'll bite :). > > The length of file names under some generic common...

Hello I'm currently working on a project to rolling out a new TFTP boot server, for a fairly large infrastructure (>200 servers, >1500 clients, with heterogeneous configurations/setups). We are using Syslinux version 6.03 for all the function within our TFTP server. We are using Ubuntu as our main TFTP server for most deployments and WDS for our

...gt; So we know which file name to surpress into 8.3. > ( yes, CP/M file name convention legacy is still present ) > > > > > If possible, also use short names for source files too. TIA. > > Euh, please visit http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/conf/2015-MSR-Unix-History/html/Spi15c.html > scroll down to '4 Data Uses', check the graphic, especial file name length. > > My point: _Why_ restrict the development system file name length? > Hehe, OK, I'll bite :). The length of file names under some generic common-user situation might not be important...