search for: spenneberg

...X are vulnerable, too. On Linux the issue was resolved with the attached patch. Could you look into this? I would like to publish a Bugtraq report after the weekend, provided that you have confirmed that either your racoon is not vulnerable or you have patches available. Regards, Ralf -- Ralf Spenneberg UNIX/Linux Trainer and Consultant, RHCE, RHCX Waldring 34 48565 Steinfurt Germany Fon: +49(0)2552 638 755 Fax: +49(0)2552 638 757 Mobil: +49(0)177 567 27 40 Markt+Technik Buch: Intrusion Detection f?r Linux Server Addison-Wes...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1381 Bug ID: 1381 Summary: Conntrackd segfaults when committing external caches Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon

...y sense to check for IFF_RUNNING on *bridges*. So I'm pretty sure that this patch doesn't harm anything. > > BTW, when you have netcf-specific questions of patches, you can send > them to netcf-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > -- Hendrik Schwartke OpenSource Security Ralf Spenneberg http://www.os-t.de Am Bahnhof 3-5 48565 Steinfurt Germany Fon: +49(0)2552 638 755 Fax: +49(0)2552 638 757

Hi everyone, First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking. My problem: I want to setup a tunnel for the following

Hi, we might have encountered a possible python 3 bug in samba 4.11. We are using the sernet-samba packages. While the classicupgrade works on centos6 (using python 2) it fails on centos8 (using python3) with a classic python3 bug message: # samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=pdc-files/ --realm=ad.xxx.de --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL pdc-files/smb.conf INFO 2019-09-25 06:15:34,366 pid:12017

...are of this issue: http://vuxml.freebsd.org/d8769838-8814-11d8-90d1-0020ed76ef5a.html racoon fails to verify signature during Phase 1 Affected packages racoon < 20040407b Details VuXML ID d8769838-8814-11d8-90d1-0020ed76ef5a Discovery 2004-04-05 Entry 2004-04-07 Ralf Spenneberg discovered a serious flaw in racoon. When using Phase 1 main or aggressive mode, racoon does not verify the client's RSA signature. Any installations using X.509 authentication are strongly urged to upgrade. Installations using pre-shared keys are believed to be unaffected. Referenc...

Hi, I have a samba 4.10 ad domain which has been running fine for quite some time. Now when I try to join windows 10 pro 1909 clients i am running in issues. 1. When I try to fully add the client to the samba ad on the client, the join seems to run fine (I am welcomed in the new domain) but the event log on the client immediately logs a line: 'Fehler beim Beitritt des Computers

Hi, the samba documentation concerning the migration of a Samba NT4 domain to AD (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_Domain_to_Samba_AD_(Classic_Upgrade)) mentions in section "Important Notes": It used to be thought that using Windows RIDs for Unix IDs was acceptable, time has proven otherwise. But unfortunately no reasoning is given. I am wondering why this is not

Hi All, I have one netcf question, please help me to resolve it, thanks. I can set a IFF_RUNNING flag to a bridge device which are no interface device attached. What status of a flag on a bridge device in current kernel?(w/o interface), is this a new change in kernel or other component? In netcf, but there is a patch to fix that flag issue, I can't understand it. fix wrong status of