Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "speextest".
Did you mean:
speedtest
2007 Apr 16
2
basic include files for speex
...n application, and whether or not there is any other documentation about speex i'm missing. thanks.
caroundw5h
compile log:
Compiler: Default compiler
Building Makefile: "G:\Code\Projects\X3\X3_TESTS\Makefile.win"
Executing make clean
rm -f ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.o speexTest.exe
gcc.exe -c ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.c -o ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.o -I"C:/Dev-Cpp/include"
gcc.exe ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.o -o "speexTest.exe" -L"C:/Dev-Cpp/lib"
....
2007 Apr 17
0
basic include files for speex
...other documentation about speex i'm missing.
> thanks.
>
> caroundw5h
>
> compile log:
>
> Compiler: Default compiler
> Building Makefile: "G:\Code\Projects\X3\X3_TESTS\Makefile.win"
> Executing make clean
> rm -f ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.o speexTest.exe
>
> gcc.exe -c ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.c -o
> ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.o -I"C:/Dev-Cpp/include"
>
> gcc.exe ../X3_DEPENDANTS/speex_1.2beta1/libspeex/speexTest.o -o
> "speexTest.exe" -L"...
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
...ith --comp 3 --quality 3
> takes less than a second (your patch is still a bit faster). How did you
> get these timings?
Using zsh's time function (gives real and user time - which are
pretty similar on this unloaded machine). I've put my sample wave
file at http://dagobah.ucc.asn.au/speextest/sample.wav if anybody
wants to compare times.
I'm curious now why my machine is slower - perhaps it's something
about the way I've compiled it. (Compiles by default with -O2, and I
can slice another .07 seconds off by compiling with -O999 :)
> Sending it to the list is a good idea...
2004 Aug 06
0
patch for libspeex
> Using zsh's time function (gives real and user time - which are
> pretty similar on this unloaded machine). I've put my sample wave
> file at http://dagobah.ucc.asn.au/speextest/sample.wav if anybody
> wants to compare times.
>
> I'm curious now why my machine is slower - perhaps it's something
> about the way I've compiled it. (Compiles by default with -O2, and I
> can slice another .07 seconds off by compiling with -O999 :)
Maybe not everythi...
2004 Aug 06
2
patch for libspeex
I have a patch for libspeex, which optimises some of the loops in
vq_nbest and vq_nbest_sign that speeds up encoding - my results:
test file: 10s wav file at 16000 Hz, mono
encoding with wideband --quality 3, --comp 3
machine: PIII-900Mhz, 256MB RAM
before: 2.78s after: 2.38s
I'm still trying to grasp the code (I'm just a coder, no background
in sound processing), and just optimised