Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "speex_mode_queri".
Did you mean:
speex_mode_query
2004 Aug 06
4
Framesize for UWB vs. WB encoding
Hi there.
I am having a little trouble understanding the frame sizes chosen
by the codec.
testenc_uwb.c from the speex-1.0 source distribution has a framesize
of 640 hardcoded and makes use of this value exclusively.
However, a mode query on the actual codec returns 320 as a framesize
for this mode.
int tmp;
speex_mode_query(&speex_uwb_mode, SPEEX_MODE_FRAME_SIZE, &tmp);
2004 Aug 06
2
SPEEX_GET_QUALITY not working?
Hello everyone,
I'm finally beginning to use Speex for a project. As expected, the
implementation so far has been very easy and I am thrilled with the
capabilities and flexibility of Speex, especially the new features in
1.1. My efforts so far have resulted in a couple of questions:
1) I was interested in fetching the default quality setting for
narrowband:
2008 Feb 12
2
Determine number of 20ms frames in packet - without decoding
Hi Alexander,
> Here is first attempt. I'm sending it here for review - am I understand
> you correctly? If general approach is correct, I'll change code to use
> modes from modes.c.
I haven't tested, but it looks sane. Just a few comments:
- printf("\tERROR not enough bits left after wb\n"); this is actually
now an error. It just means you got to the end of the
2004 Aug 06
0
Framesize for UWB vs. WB encoding
Oops... You've just found a bug. Seems like you're the first one to use
that call. Anyway, it's now fixed in CVS (both trunk and 1.0.x branch).
Thanks for the bug report.
Jean-Marc
Le mar 03/06/2003 à 01:16, Christian Buchner a écrit :
> Hi there.
>
> I am having a little trouble understanding the frame sizes chosen
> by the codec.
>
> testenc_uwb.c from
2004 Aug 06
0
SPEEX_GET_QUALITY not working?
> 1) I was interested in fetching the default quality setting
> fornarrowband:
> speex_encoder_ctl(_encodeState, SPEEX_GET_QUALITY, &value);
>
> Unfortunately, the above fails with libspeex 1.1.4. The console
> shows:
>
> warning: Unknown nb_ctl request: 5
Actually, I never implemented SPEEX_GET_QUALITY. It's not that usefule
anyway, but I might do it in the
2004 Aug 06
1
querying submodes
> Use speex_mode_query with SPEEX_SUBMODE_BITS_PER_FRAME
> You need to pass the submode number with the pointer and the number of
> bits per frame is returned using the same pointer. Note that with
> speex_mode_query, the first argument is the mode (e.g. &speex_nb_mode),
> not the encoder/decoder state.
Thank you Jean-Marc,
This works well. Now a followup question. Is there
2008 Feb 13
0
Determine number of 20ms frames in packet - without decoding
Hi,
Ok, here is cleaned up and fixed version.
* Function is named speex_get_num_frames() now and return
number of frames, as you suggested.
* WB layers sizes are taken from wb_skip_table[], while NB frame
sizes are calculated with speex_mode_query().
I've tested it with testenc in NB, WB and UWB modes with VBR enabled
to test in as many cases as possible. It seems to work fine.
Though,
2005 Sep 03
2
Library export file for Win32 (patch)
This patch will export new speex functions in the generated library, such
as speex_encode_int as well as the preprocessor, echo-cancellation and
jitterbuffers. The ordinals used matches the 1.1.6 release from the
speex.org website, so any new library created with this def file should be
binary compatible with that one.
-------------- next part --------------
Index: speex.def
2008 Feb 13
2
Determine number of 20ms frames in packet - without decoding
> Ok, here is cleaned up and fixed version.
>
> * Function is named speex_get_num_frames() now and return
> number of frames, as you suggested.
> * WB layers sizes are taken from wb_skip_table[], while NB frame
> sizes are calculated with speex_mode_query().
Looking better. Just make sure to remove the stuff that isn't
C99-compatible (e.g. // comments).
> I've
2008 Feb 12
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Hi,
when I compile with FIXED_DEBUG enabled, I get an error -- both when make tries to build testenc.o and when I try to link my app against the speex lib:
lorenz@panelmaker:~/Blackfin/tests/speex_loopthrough$ make
bfin-uclinux-gcc -c -g -I/home/lorenz/include -o main.o main.c
bfin-uclinux-gcc -gl -elf2flt -L/home/lorenz/lib -o speex_through main.o -lspeex_debug -lspeexdsp -lm
2007 Jul 24
0
Shoehorning speex is confusing a newbie
Jean-Marc was correct in that the 16bit value was the culprit for my
encoding woes. after I changed that to a 32 bit value I believe it
encodes correctly, but I really don't have much of any way to know this
absolutely.
I am using the 1.2beta2. I would use the enctest program, I have
looked it over and based a lot of what I am doing on that code but the
project I am developing this on is
2007 Jul 24
0
Shoehorning speex is confusing a newbie
Mike,
Generally "Invalid mode encounterd" == "frames are misaligned"
You should be getting 20 bytes from the encoder each time, and passing 20 bytes to the decoder each time. Is it correct that you have modeled your main loop after testenc-TI-c5x.c?
If you look at encoded silence with a binary editor, you should be able to see the 20-byte repetition pattern. You can also
2008 Mar 29
0
GCC/ELF Visibility patch
Hi,
I've attached a patch against SVN r14645 which adds GCC visibility
information to all symbols exported from libspeex.so and libspeexdsp.so.
It includes a configure.ac change to test that both the compiler flags and
__attribute__((visibility)) works, and if so will
#define EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default")))
and if not
#define EXPORT
I've attached a diff output
2007 Jul 24
0
Shoehorning speex is confusing a newbie
I thought I should be getting 20 words because in the windows app the
command line repeats "nbBytes = 20" through the entire decode phase. I
wonder how the frames got misaligned...right now I get 10 words of data
followed by 10 words of 0's which I look at through a memory window in
code composer. now I am pretty sure there is a terminator word that gets
in there so that would make
2008 Feb 22
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Hi Jean-Marc,
after some problems with getting svn to work here I finally made it. Problem is, you write that I cannot use libspeex and libspeexdsp at the same time now -- because I use a "live" system (mic-in -> speex_enc -> speex_dec -> headphone out) and I can run the AD1836 audio codec on 48 kHz only, I cannot use my program now (because I use speex resampling...)
So I
2008 Mar 29
2
GCC/ELF Visibility patch (fwd)
Hi,
I've attached a patch against SVN r14645 which adds GCC visibility information
to all symbols exported from libspeex.so and libspeexdsp.so. It includes a
configure.ac change to test that both the compiler flags and
__attribute__((visibility)) works, and if so will
#define EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default")))
and if not
#define EXPORT
I've attached a diff output
2008 Mar 05
1
Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
Jean-Marc, Frank,
I have stumbled across a similar situation regarding optimization.
I seem to have a similar setup as Frank does with a fixed 48khz in and out. The wideband mode and ultra-wideband modes are really what I?m looking for.
I have a test application that reads audio, downsample to 16kHz (or 32kHz), speex encode, speex decode, upsample back to 48kHz, and playback.
If I remove
2005 May 25
3
Speex on TI C6x, Problem with TI C5x Patch
Hi Jean-Marc, Hi Jim,
I have also seen some problems with the 1.1.8 release on the C55x. So far I
have boiled down the issues to the following:
1) We need our own "fixed_xx.h" header file. I don't know why, and haven't
had time to investigate, but there is a definite improvement when I use the
attached fixed_c55x.h file which has turned all the maths into inline
functions.