Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "speex_default_user_handl".
Did you mean:
speex_default_user_handler
2007 Aug 06
2
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...ery
wb_mode_query
speex_lib_ctl
In speex_callbacks.c:
speex_inband_handler
speex_std_mode_request_handler
speex_std_low_mode_request_handler
speex_std_high_mode_request_handler
speex_std_vbr_request_handler
speex_std_enh_request_handler
speex_std_vbr_quality_request_handler
speex_std_char_handler
speex_default_user_handler
In vbr.c:
vbr_analysis
vbr_destroy
In vq.c:
vq_index
vq_nbest_sign
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070806/81ab5672/attachment.htm
2005 Sep 03
2
Library export file for Win32 (patch)
...ck_signed
-speex_bits_unpack_unsigned
-speex_bits_nbytes
-speex_bits_peek_unsigned
-speex_bits_peek
-speex_bits_advance
-speex_bits_remaining
-speex_bits_insert_terminator
-speex_inband_handler
-speex_std_mode_request_handler
-speex_std_high_mode_request_handler
-speex_std_char_handler
-speex_default_user_handler
-speex_std_low_mode_request_handler
-speex_std_vbr_request_handler
-speex_std_enh_request_handler
-speex_std_vbr_quality_request_handler
-speex_init_header
-speex_header_to_packet
-speex_packet_to_header
-speex_encode_stereo
-speex_decode_stereo
-speex_std_stereo_request_handler
+speex...
2007 Jul 07
3
In-band user data
...ode the packet.
And this works :) My custom handler, set with SPEEX_SET_USER_HANDLER is
called and everything is good.
However, I kinda wondered what would happen if that handler WASN'T
installed... And things aren't so good then.
Looking at the code in speex_callbacks.c, it seems the
speex_default_user_handler first unpacks 4 bits as size, then advances
8*size + 5 bits.
First of all, shouldn't that be 5 bits for size (to match manual)? And
where did that '+ 5 bits' come from?
Next, and slightly unrelated question:
Why does
int jitter_buffer_update_delay(JitterBuffer *jitter, JitterBuffe...
2007 Aug 07
1
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...llbacks.c:
> speex_inband_handler
> speex_std_mode_request_handler
> speex_std_low_mode_request_handler
> speex_std_high_mode_request_handler
> speex_std_vbr_request_handler
> speex_std_enh_request_handler
> speex_std_vbr_quality_request_handler
> speex_std_char_handler
> speex_default_user_handler
No need for that.
> In vbr.c:
> vbr_analysis
> vbr_destroy
No need for that.
> In vq.c:
> vq_index
> vq_nbest_sign
No need for those.
So yes, there's a lot of stuff you can remove. You can also get rid of
the stereo preprocess, mdf files. You can also remove the VBR p...
2007 Aug 07
1
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...llbacks.c:
> speex_inband_handler
> speex_std_mode_request_handler
> speex_std_low_mode_request_handler
> speex_std_high_mode_request_handler
> speex_std_vbr_request_handler
> speex_std_enh_request_handler
> speex_std_vbr_quality_request_handler
> speex_std_char_handler
> speex_default_user_handler
>
> In vbr.c:
> vbr_analysis
> vbr_destroy
>
> In vq.c:
> vq_index
> vq_nbest_sign
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev ma...
2007 Aug 07
0
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...ex_callbacks.c: speex_inband_handler
>> speex_std_mode_request_handler speex_std_low_mode_request_handler
>> speex_std_high_mode_request_handler speex_std_vbr_request_handler
>> speex_std_enh_request_handler speex_std_vbr_quality_request_handler
>> speex_std_char_handler speex_default_user_handler
>>
>> In vbr.c: vbr_analysis vbr_destroy
>>
>> In vq.c: vq_index vq_nbest_sign
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________...
2008 Mar 29
0
GCC/ELF Visibility patch
...-int speex_std_char_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
+EXPORT int speex_std_char_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
{
unsigned char ch;
ch = speex_bits_unpack_unsigned(bits, 8);
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
/* Default handler for user callbacks: skip it */
-int speex_default_user_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
+EXPORT int speex_default_user_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
{
int req_size = speex_bits_unpack_unsigned(bits, 4);
speex_bits_advance(bits, 5+8*req_size);
Index: libspeex/buffer.c
==============================================...
2008 Mar 29
2
GCC/ELF Visibility patch (fwd)
...-int speex_std_char_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
+EXPORT int speex_std_char_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
{
unsigned char ch;
ch = speex_bits_unpack_unsigned(bits, 8);
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
/* Default handler for user callbacks: skip it */
-int speex_default_user_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
+EXPORT int speex_default_user_handler(SpeexBits *bits, void *state, void *data)
{
int req_size = speex_bits_unpack_unsigned(bits, 4);
speex_bits_advance(bits, 5+8*req_size);
Index: libspeex/buffer.c
==============================================...
2008 Feb 12
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
...32':
/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/fixed_debug.h:466: multiple definition of `_spx_mips'
/home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex.o):/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex.c:52: first defined here
/home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex_callbacks.o): In function `speex_default_user_handler':
/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex_callbacks.c:140: multiple definition of `_spx_mips'
/home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex.o):/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex.c:52: first defined here
/home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(window.o):(.bss+0x0): multipl...
2008 Feb 22
1
Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
...home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/fixed_debug.h:466: multiple definition of `_spx_mips'
> /home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex.o):/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex.c:52: first defined here
> /home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex_callbacks.o): In function `speex_default_user_handler':
> /home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex_callbacks.c:140: multiple definition of `_spx_mips'
> /home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex.o):/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex.c:52: first defined here
> /home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(window.o):(.bs...
2008 Mar 05
1
Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???
...ibspeex/fixed_debug.h:466:
>> multiple definition of `_spx_mips'
>> /home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex.o):/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex.c:52:
>> first defined here
>> /home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex_callbacks.o): In function
>> `speex_default_user_handler':
>> /home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex_callbacks.c:140:
>> multiple definition of `_spx_mips'
>> /home/lorenz/lib/libspeex_debug.a(speex.o):/home/lorenz/Blackfin/speex-1.2beta3/libspeex/speex.c:52:
>> first defined here
>> /home/lorenz/li...
2005 May 25
3
Speex on TI C6x, Problem with TI C5x Patch
...frames)*sizeof(spx_word32_t));
st->last_pitch = 40;
st->count_lost=0;
st->pitch_gain_buf[0] = st->pitch_gain_buf[1] = st->pitch_gain_buf[2] =
0;
st->pitch_gain_buf_idx = 0;
st->sampling_rate=8000;
st->last_ol_gain = 0;
st->user_callback.func = &speex_default_user_handler;
st->user_callback.data = NULL;
for (i=0;i<16;i++)
st->speex_callbacks[i].func = NULL;
st->voc_m1=st->voc_m2=st->voc_mean=0;
st->voc_offset=0;
st->dtx_enabled=0;
#ifdef ENABLE_VALGRIND
VALGRIND_MAKE_READABLE(st, (st->stack-(char*)st));
#endif...