search for: speedwise

...ely understand your other proposed change: ​ for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MBB->begin(); MBBI != MBB->end(); ) { MachineInstr *NewMI = NULL; OldMI = MBBI; ++MBBI; I think you're saying with ++MBBI to step past the old instruction. This seems faster speedwise but more of a hack than just restarting the loop. But I'll try it. It implies a certain knowledge of the iterator and MBB. I accidentally touched MachineInstr.h and the rebuild is extracting its punishment. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <htt...

...always have > lower identifiers than their offspring) and with missing > values coded as 0. > > How would I go about doing this? > You might look at http://www.qimr.edu.au/davidD/sib-pair.R, specifically the read.pedigree() and wrlink() functions. The former is not very impressive speedwise -- I usually perform these tasks in the my Sib-pair (Fortran) program, which is on the same webpage. It will order the pedigree by generational position, so a DOB is not required to do the sort. Terry Therneau's kinship package does that ordering, but doesn't include output routines for t...

There are 11 BuildMI() functions in MachineInstrBuilder.h including four using the iterator and one using an instruction. But I just don't think that's it. The creation of the new instruction works fine (works fine with OldMI as well) and the new instruction is present in the assembly output. The problem is removing the old instruction correctly. > The loop header needs to be

man for `qr` says that the function uses LINPACK's DQRDC, while it in fact uses DQRDC2. ``` The QR decomposition of the matrix as computed by LINPACK or LAPACK. The components in the returned value correspond directly to the values returned by DQRDC/DGEQP3/ZGEQP3 ```

Hello! I am about to buy a new computer, and because encoding/decoding .ogg files is the most processor intensive thing I intend to regularly do, I would like to know which is the "recommended" processor for real-time encoding (I record my favourite radio shows). TIA! Bye, Joane Lispton PS: I receive the FM radio stations through my cable (the one which brings me cable TV),

Hey Everyone, We are in the works of planning a new * installation for our company. We have 20 users in our main office and 5 users in a remote office a couple of states away. Our call volume for the main office will be anywhere from 5-10 concurrent calls. The remote office will have about 3 heavy users with two users making calls occasionally. Right now we have an existing PBX. We have a