search for: speclib

Dear R-developers, in a new package, I'm currently working on, I tried to add a new method to function "t.test". The new class, on which the method is based, is called "speclib", so I defined the funcion for the new method as "t.test.speclib". R CMD check now gives always a warning, that S3 methods are not consistent, because R does not recognize that the basic function name is "t.test" instead of "t": t: function(x) t.test.speclib...

...ass the checks in R-devel. The workaround, Kurt Hornik send me, is working for the R-code: if("simplify" %in% names(formals(base::apply))) do something else do something else Unfortunately, I cannot conditionalize the man pages of the functions. I get the message that "applySpeclib.Rd:12-14: Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped" if I try to dynamically define the entire usage section. If I try to use \Sexpr inside the \usage section, I get the following warning: "applySpeclib.Rd:13-15: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \usage block" Does anybody ha...

Interesting problem. I'm very rusty on S4 but would one solution be to, already now, add 'simplify = TRUE' to the S4 method and document it; setMethod("apply", signature(X = "Speclib"), function(X, FUN, bySI = NULL, ..., simplify = TRUE) { ? Henrik On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 6:26 AM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > You didn't explained what the error...

hsdar is back on CRAN We are very happy to announce that a new version of the hsdar-package (hyperspectral data analysis in R) is available on CRAN. The introductory vignette is available here: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hsdar/vignettes/Hsdar-intro.pdf The main class "Speclib" has been changed in that the additional information is now stored in the SI slot (function "SI" replaced "attribute" for update/access). This change was used to restructure how the supplementary data is internally stored and allows the user to use e.g. raster images as...

...around, Kurt Hornik send me, is working for the R-code: > if("simplify" %in% names(formals(base::apply))) > do something > else > do something else > > Unfortunately, I cannot conditionalize the man pages of the functions. I get > the message > that "applySpeclib.Rd:12-14: Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be > dropped" if I try to > dynamically define the entire usage section. If I try to use \Sexpr inside the > \usage section, > I get the following warning: "applySpeclib.Rd:13-15: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in > a \usage block&qu...