search for: specint

Hi, Does anyone know how to fix the following error? I am compiling 254.gap as a part of test-suite with the following command in llvm-2.9/obj/projects/test-suite/External/SPEC/CINT2000. make -C 254.gap /home/dskhudia/tmp/llvm-2.9/obj/projects/test-suite/../../../projects/test-suite/RunToolSafely.sh 500 /home/dskhudia/tmp/llvm-2.9/obj/Release/bin/opt -std-compile-opts

...ly, I don't think the programs get executed at all, because make runs too fast. For gap/gcc, only the cbe test fails, the other (including JIT) are ok. Affected benchmarks: galgel, equake, lucas, gcc, gap, facerec, sixtrack, wupwise, mgrid, applu, apsi Since these include both SPECfp and SPECint benchmarks, this has nothing todo with f95. *** 2) *** Undefined references With 3 benchmarks (vpr, crafty and eon), I'm getting similar undefined references: /tmp/ccGCQxYs.o(.text+0x76b2): In function `init_chan': 175.vpr.cbe.c: undefined reference to `ltmp_6791_156' /tmp/ccGC...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gerolf Hoflehner" <ghoflehner at apple.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Jiangning Liu" <liujiangning1 at gmail.com>, "George Burgess IV" > <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014

...ion, > just like XOR or ADD, > so the overhead should be relatively small. > Still my guesstimate would be >= 5% since stores are very numerous. > And such overhead will be on top of whatever overhead SafeStack has. > Do you have any measurements to share? > Here are estimated SPECint_base2006 component runtimes for some relevant test configurations: Runtime in seconds: +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |Benchmark|Unpatched|Unpatched|Patched|MPX| ||Base|SafeStack|SafeStack|| +--------------+---------+---------+---------+-------+ |400.perlbench |430.82...

...demonstrates the code generated for both approaches. The key differences are highlighted inline. Evaluation In this section, we present an in-depth evaluation of the impact on clang bootstrap and summary results for two google internal workloads, Search1 and Search2 as well overall results on the SPECInt 2017 benchmarks. All experiments are conducted on Intel Skylake based systems unless otherwise noted. Profile guided optimizations using instrumented profiles are enabled for all builds. clang-bootstrap We pick 500 compiler invocations from a bootstrap build of clang and then evaluate the perform...

On 01 Sep 2006, at 10:05, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> >>> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >>> can I >>> enforce this? >> >> Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or >> whatever. > I tried tom compile each of the SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks using the make command is each respective

...mulator does this; I used it with great success to > profile an Advanced Encryption Standard encryptor a while back. It is indeed a useful piece of kit. We do a lot of our internal regression tests on it, and also run LLVM's regression tests every night on it (as well as PlumHall, EEMBC and SpecInt). Unfortunately it's not exactly software we can give away or give access to. ________________________________________ From: Don Quixote de la Mancha [quixote at dulcineatech.com] Sent: 13 October 2011 18:47 To: Joe Abbey Cc: Renato Golin; rajav at codeaurora.org; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; James...

...s get executed at all, because > make runs too fast. > > For gap/gcc, only the cbe test fails, the other (including JIT) are ok. > > Affected benchmarks: galgel, equake, lucas, gcc, gap, facerec, > sixtrack, wupwise, mgrid, applu, apsi > > Since these include both SPECfp and SPECint benchmarks, this has > nothing todo with f95. > > *** 2) *** Undefined references > > With 3 benchmarks (vpr, crafty and eon), I'm getting similar > undefined references: > > /tmp/ccGCQxYs.o(.text+0x76b2): In function `init_chan': > 175.vpr.cbe.c: undefined refere...

Using clang r107598 at -O1 to create reportable SPECINT 2006 results, I'm getting the output below, which is almost certainly due to a miscompilation. Known problem? Thanks, John Running (#3) 403.gcc ref base i386-m32-gcc42-nn default /home/regehr/z/specCPU2006/bin/specinvoke -d /home/regehr/z/specCPU2006/benchspec/CPU2006/403.gcc/run/run...

...ode. > > Also note that having glibc compiled by LLVM isn't a prerequisite for > your new ISA, as long as you either emulate the library calls or you > have it compiled in some other manner for your target architecture. > The nasty thing about this, is that from my experience SPECInt spends a considerable amount of time in standard library calls (esp. the memory and string manipulation functions). I think I'll try playing around with glibc for a bit. At worst I'll end up adding a compatibility mode and hand-code some of the common simple ones (memcpy, memset, etc...

On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on >> this. Can you >> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? > > It is identical to yours. > >> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >> can I >>

...demonstrates the code generated for both approaches. The key differences are highlighted inline. Evaluation In this section, we present an in-depth evaluation of the impact on clang bootstrap and summary results for two google internal workloads, Search1 and Search2 as well overall results on the SPECInt 2017 benchmarks. All experiments are conducted on Intel Skylake based systems unless otherwise noted. Profile guided optimizations using instrumented profiles are enabled for all builds. clang-bootstrap We pick 500 compiler invocations from a bootstrap build of clang and then evaluate the perfor...

I noticed that the open projects lists porting glibc to LLVM. I was wondering if anyone was working on this currently. If no one is on it, does anyone have an idea of how nasty this would be to do? I'd like to have LLVM output to a new ISA, it'd be great if all I had to do was proxy system calls like read and write in my architectural simulator. -- Francesco Spadini

...differences are highlighted >> inline. >> >> Evaluation >> >> In this section, we present an in-depth evaluation of the impact on clang >> bootstrap and summary results for two google internal workloads, Search1 >> and Search2 as well overall results on the SPECInt 2017 benchmarks. All >> experiments are conducted on Intel Skylake based systems unless otherwise >> noted. Profile guided optimizations using instrumented profiles are enabled >> for all builds. >> >> clang-bootstrap >> >> We pick 500 compiler invocations...

I've got a couple of SPARCstation 2s (about as fast as a fast 486, for most thing) that I'm going to be using for some testing. I realize that these machines are a bit slow, but when connecting via OpenSSH, it's MUCH slower than connecting to my 486-DX 50. The point where it waits is just after "debug: Sent encrypted session key.". The pause is for about 10 seconds, while

...t takes 1/3 of the time as before. Much more bearable. This, however, makes the program less readable. 3. R on different platforms: Thomas Lumley said: On platforms: R performs at similar speed between Windows and Linux, and my limited comparisons between Intel and SPARC machines suggest that the SPECint rating will give a reasonable ballpark estimate of speed across platforms. This means you probably don't want to shift off Intel for speed reasons unless you have a LOT of money. Prof. Ripley said: R runs its tests and my scripts between 5% and 20% slower on Windows NT/2000 than on linux RH6....

Hi all, I find that SPEC cpu2k benchmark will always fail (9 of 10 times) for ia32 smp hvm guest with 4 vcpus. I used 4 users parameter to run cpu2k and assign 1G memory for the guest, but it will always fail when running 164.zip case and report warnings as the attachments. However, cpu2k could be run successfully in native linux and xenU guest with the same configuration. Anyone has ideas about

...ngs emulator does this; I used it with great success to profile an Advanced Encryption Standard encryptor a while back. It is indeed a useful piece of kit. We do a lot of our internal regression tests on it, and also run LLVM's regression tests every night on it (as well as PlumHall, EEMBC and SpecInt). Unfortunately it's not exactly software we can give away or give access to. ________________________________________ From: Don Quixote de la Mancha [quixote at dulcineatech.com<mailto:quixote at dulcineatech.com>] Sent: 13 October 2011 18:47 To: Joe Abbey Cc: Renato Golin; rajav at code...

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: > However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM > on a host of target boards.  We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, > iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc.  And most of those are already > booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Dietmar Ebner <ebner at complang.tuwien.ac.at>wrote: > On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > > The problem I've had is building an LLVM cross-compiler from Linux/ > > x86 to Linux/ARM (as has another llvm-dev poster). Someone > > mentioned to me off-list that he managed to get it to build, but I > > haven't