Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "specil".
Did you mean:
special
2010 May 05
3
question on virtio
Hi!
I see this in virtio_ring.c:
/* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx *
until they do sync). */
Why is it done this way?
It seems that updating the index straight away would be simpler, while
this might allow the host to specilatively look up the buffer and handle
it, without waiting for the kick.
--
MST
2010 May 05
3
question on virtio
Hi!
I see this in virtio_ring.c:
/* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx *
until they do sync). */
Why is it done this way?
It seems that updating the index straight away would be simpler, while
this might allow the host to specilatively look up the buffer and handle
it, without waiting for the kick.
--
MST
2007 Feb 20
8
overriding included classes
I believe this has already been discussed[1], but I''d like to add a bit
more to that original discussion and see if anyone has any suggestions.
Here''s what I''m trying to do: we have a set of very thorough "wipe"
scripts that run every night on our workstations. I''d like to stash
these into a class so that I can include them as a group:
class wiped
2019 Sep 09
3
Vectorizing multiple exit loops
I've recently mentioned in a few places that I'm interested in enhancing
the loop vectorizer to handle multiple exit loops, and have been asked
to share plans. This email is intended to a) share my current thinking
and b) help spark discussion among interested parties. I do need to
warn that my near term plans for this have been delayed; I got pulled
into an internal project
2019 Sep 18
2
Vectorizing multiple exit loops
...> ... other vectorizable stuff ...
>> }
>>
>> for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
>> if (expr(i)) break;
>> ... other vectorizable stuff ...
>> }
> The safety analysis is different, but the vectorizer would have to
> behave similarly on both cases. Specilative loads, boundary
> conditions, run time checks (unless the bounds are compile time
> constants?).
>
> Doing the latter first would make the second almost *only* about
> reference analysis.
>
>
>> First, there are all the cases where we could have handled the multiple...
2005 Jul 02
10
Linux Distribution for Asterisk server use
Hello,
My question is about which Linux distribution to choose for Asterisk. (/me
holds breath) OK, hopefully you're still reading, because whatever you were
thinking now, you're thinking wrong! ;)
First of all, I want to make clear that I have read EVERY message and reply
that I could possibly find about this topic, so that includes the dozens of
messages here on the Asterisk