search for: specify_neg

Hello, I have played a bit on a negative specification idea: http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/1/25/rspec-specify_negatively What do you think about it? Yurii Rashkovskii Technology Director Railsware.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070125/12c4f473/attachment.html

Hello, I''ve just released rspec-ext 0.0.1 (http://rubyforge.org/projects/ rspec-ext/) It is gem-installable (rspec-ext gem) It is simply two _experimental_ (and may be not well tested) extensions of rspec as for now: * specify_negatively (http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/1/25/rspec- specify_negatively, http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/2/3/ specify_negatively-updated) * aspects (http://rashkovskii.com/articles/2007/2/13/rspec-aspects) As I''ve said above, all this stuff is pretty much experimental, though...

The new "pending" example feature reminds me of a feature I''ve been bouncing around in my head, to aid in refactoring. Often, when I''m changing existing behaviour, I know that certain aspects of the old behaviour should change. Imagine changing the "it" method to perhaps "not" or "old" or "removed"... The behaviour would be to