search for: specialusers

On 20.05.2010 13:55, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 20.5.2010, at 11.10, Nikolay Shopik wrote: > >> What you think about this draft is it good enough to make patch based on it for dovecot? We would like to see this functionality in 2.0 dovecot release but it's not clear when this draft become standards track. Will you accept patch based on drafts? > > Have you read the discussion

I plan to define SPECIAL-USE mailboxes and think about defining per user special-use folders for those who don't use the default folder names. Is this possible in dovecot? What I try: $ doveadm exec imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE

http://imapwiki.org/SpecialUse Please fill out for all clients with all languages you know of. Knowing the mailbox names can be helpful with Dovecot's mailbox_alias plugin.

Hello, Some versions of Outlook will randomly rename the Junk folder to Junk Email. This of course causes errors because Dovecot can no longer store junk. I go in to Outlook for each user and add another Junk folder, so now they have Junk and Junk Email. This fix action lasts a while until Outlook decides to do it again. Is there a way to tell Dovecot that if the Junk folder doesn't

> On 12 Jun 2019, at 23.01, Cliff Hayes via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > Some versions of Outlook will randomly rename the Junk folder to Junk Email. > > This of course causes errors because Dovecot can no longer store junk. > > I go in to Outlook for each user and add another Junk folder, so now they have Junk and Junk Email. This

...I create new users they don't have any Group associations in Samba. I have a bunch of groups in the LDAP tree as well as users. The server uses libnss_ldap and pam_ldap to access the ldap tree. If use do getent group then i'll see this... # getent group domainusers: user1, user2, user3 specialusers: user1, user2, user3 Which is correct, and those users are indeed in those groups when I look in the LDAP tree. However if I login to a Windows machine on the Samba domain as user3, I'll only see SAMBADOMAIN\None. user1 and user2 will both correctly see SAMBADOMAIN\domainusers, SAMBADOMAIN\s...

Hi, Great to see Thunderbird support SPECIAL-USE now. I would like to hear the list about the intended use of SPECIAL-USE. I get the impression from several earlier mails here that the intention is for the server to globally decide what the folder-name of a specific SPECIAL-USE folder is for all users. That's the way the documentation exemplifies it and what I get from posts like this:

Timo, would you consider adding support for "IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes" <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6154.txt> any time near in the future? I would really love to get rid of all those folders created by all those different mail clients just because they can't agree to use the same folder for special purpose. Obviously clients need to support it too.

On 12/29/2014 11:22 AM, Peter Mogensen wrote: > Hi, > > Great to see Thunderbird support SPECIAL-USE now. > > I would like to hear the list about the intended use of SPECIAL-USE. > > I get the impression from several earlier mails here that the > intention is for the server to globally decide what the folder-name of > a specific SPECIAL-USE folder is for all users. >

I just did a search through my archives - seems this topic has been requested a few times since my posting two years ago. I asked about a specific implementation - which Mr. Sirainen never commented on. He was probably focused on something more important at the time - like a paying job. So I'll ask again... Calling Timo! If we can't get clients to agree on a "standard"

Hmmm, confusing, clients should then display the mailbox name redirected by the server. If a user in a front end just sees the 'Junk E-mail', that is the name he is going to be using in his mailbox rules. If he does not know that this is actually the Junk folder on the server, he will make an incorrect message rule. So I guess you have to correct this server side, before storing

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.19.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.19.tar.gz.sig * pop3_deleted_flag has been broken since v2.2.10. Using it would cause buffer overflows, which could be exploitable. However, this bug would have become visible quite soon after users had deleted some POP3 mails, because the pop3 processes would have started crashing all the

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.19.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.19.tar.gz.sig * pop3_deleted_flag has been broken since v2.2.10. Using it would cause buffer overflows, which could be exploitable. However, this bug would have become visible quite soon after users had deleted some POP3 mails, because the pop3 processes would have started crashing all the

...s configuration security = user encrypt passwords = true # LDAP Configuration domain logons = Yes wins support = Yes ldap suffix = dc=cp,dc=dias,dc=ie ldap machine suffix = ou=people ldap user suffix = ou=people ldap group suffix = ou=group ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap ldap admin dn = cn=samba,ou=specialusers,dc=cp,dc=dias,dc=ie idmap backend = ldap:ldap://127.0.0.1 idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 map acl inherit = Yes - -------------------------------- Trying an ldapsearch to show groups exist in ldap returns.. ldapsearch -x -b cn=geotech,ou=group,dc=cp,dc=dias,dc=ie dn: cn=geotech,o...

Hello; Some issue with virtual storage and fts-lucene: Sep 24 08:12:16 imap(jbv00 at x <jbv00 at d1.dc.xandmail.com>xx): Panic: file virtual-storage.c: line 370 (virtual_backend_box_close): assertion failed: (mbox->backends_open_count > 0) Sep 24 08:12:16 imap(jbv00 at x <jbv00 at d1.dc.xandmail.com>xx): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x7fb4a)

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz.sig A lot of changes since v2.2.18, so here's a release candidate first. If no bugs are reported, I'm planning on making the final release sometimes this week. The most interesting new features here are the imap-hibernate process, quota count backend and director/proxy

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.19.rc1.tar.gz.sig A lot of changes since v2.2.18, so here's a release candidate first. If no bugs are reported, I'm planning on making the final release sometimes this week. The most interesting new features here are the imap-hibernate process, quota count backend and director/proxy