Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "specer".
Did you mean:
spencer
2004 Oct 25
1
[LLVMdev] Some question on LLVM design
...erent pointer
> types for managed and unmanaged pointers: without the ability to represent
> both in LLVM, we could not support it.
>
Ok, I understand this now. Would allocation to different heaps be
represented using different intrinsics, then?
Also, some answers were provided by Reid Specer, so I'm merging the two
threads here:
> Intrinsics are intended to be replaceable by the target's code
> generation, if possible/necessary, or emulated with a function call if
> not. Language runtimes should be just that .. calls to functions located
> in libraries.
But s...
2004 Oct 24
0
[LLVMdev] Some question on LLVM design
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Marc Ordinas i Llopis wrote:
> Hi everybody,
Hi!
> I'm currently looking at LLVM as a possible back-end to a dynamic
> programming system (in the tradition of Smalltalk) we are developing. I
Very cool!
> have read most of the llvmdev archives, and I'm aware that some things
> are 'planned' but not implemented yet. We are willing to
2004 Oct 22
6
[LLVMdev] Some question on LLVM design
Hi everybody,
I'm currently looking at LLVM as a possible back-end to a dynamic
programming system (in the tradition of Smalltalk) we are developing. I
have read most of the llvmdev archives, and I'm aware that some things
are 'planned' but not implemented yet. We are willing to contribute the
code we'll need for our project, but before I can start coding I'll have
to