search for: spec2k

...unrecognized gcc debugging option: u f951: error: unrecognized command line option "-fixed" make[4]: *** [modules.c] Error 1 ? This man page: http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/gfortran.1.html says there's no such option as -kind Do I need some special version of f95 to run the SPEC2K tests? Reid.

Hi, what is the recommended base configuration of SPEC2k and SPEC06 for clang/llvm? I got compilation error with eon when using gcc's flags (emit error on converting wchar* ..) -- there must be some portability flags I am missing. Thanks, David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org...

...or: unrecognized command line option "-fixed" > make[4]: *** [modules.c] Error 1 > > ? > > This man page: > http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/gfortran.1.html > > says there's no such option as -kind > > Do I need some special version of f95 to run the SPEC2K tests? If I'm correct, f95 has nothing to do with GCC. GCC has the gfortran compiler, but this is a Fortran-to-binary compiler. You want the NAG f95 compiler, which allows Fortran-to-C translation, what you appear to be doing. http://www.nag.co.uk/nagware/np.asp (it's commercial, but I t...

...2006-11-25 at 10:12 +0100, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > > > ? > > > > This man page: > > http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/gfortran.1.html > > > > says there's no such option as -kind > > > > Do I need some special version of f95 to run the SPEC2K tests? > > If I'm correct, f95 has nothing to do with GCC. As I just discovered, gfortran creates an f95 symbolic link to gfortran when it is installed. > GCC has the gfortran compiler, but this is a Fortran-to-binary compiler. > You want the NAG f95 compiler, which allows Fortr...

...LLVM has a new native Sparc backend available. This target is built with the LLVM target independent code generator, and can generate V8 or V9 binaries [1] using the 32-bit Sparc ABI. The code generator is quite stable, compiling virtually all [2] of the llvm-test testsuite (including all of SPEC2K), and is quite performant (averaging ~7% faster on SPEC2K than GCC 3.4.5, with a lot of low-hanging things left). It is about 3700 lines of code for the entire port. A nightly tester is available here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/SPARC/index.html To use it, you currently must build th...

...-inline -inline-threshold=xxx < output.bc | llc -march=c > output_inline.c 1) I noticed that even if I set xxx to 0 or even a very small negative number, many functions are eliminated. I am wondering if these functions are inlined by the frontend, or identified as deadcode. For instance, SPEC2k bzip2 has 79 functions, after these two steps, only 61 functions are left. no other optimizations are used. 2) I noticed that the inlining condition (in Transforms/IPO/InlineSimple.cpp) is tested during llvm-gcc but not during the opt phase ? Can anybody explain what happens during llvm-gcc an...

...d disable all LLVM optimizations. -- John T. > > 1) > I noticed that even if I set xxx to 0 or even a very small negative > number, many functions are eliminated. I am wondering if these functions > are inlined by the frontend, or identified as deadcode. > > For instance, SPEC2k bzip2 has 79 functions, after these two steps, only > 61 functions are left. no other optimizations are used. > > 2) > I noticed that the inlining condition (in > Transforms/IPO/InlineSimple.cpp) is tested during llvm-gcc but not > during the opt phase ? Can anybody explain wh...

Hi Michael, Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6 on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%) improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. Regarding the cost model, I think the vectorizer's modeling of the conditional stores is go...

...> -- John T. > >> >> 1) >> I noticed that even if I set xxx to 0 or even a very small negative >> number, many functions are eliminated. I am wondering if these >> functions are inlined by the frontend, or identified as deadcode. >> >> For instance, SPEC2k bzip2 has 79 functions, after these two steps, >> only 61 functions are left. no other optimizations are used. >> >> 2) >> I noticed that the inlining condition (in >> Transforms/IPO/InlineSimple.cpp) is tested during llvm-gcc but not >> during the opt phase ?...

...no serious regressions this SGTM. > On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:41 AM, Matthew Simpson <mssimpso at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6 on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%) improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. > > Regarding the cost model, I think the vectorizer's modeling of the conditional st...

..., 2016, at 5:41 AM, Matthew Simpson > > <mssimpso at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the > > results will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature > > with spec2k/2k6 on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, > > aside from a large (30%) improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The > > primary loop in that benchmark has a conditional store, so I > > expected it to benefit. > > > > Regarding the cost model, I think the vectori...

...oogle.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer Hi Michael, Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6 on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%) improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. Regarding the cost model, I think the vectorizer's modeling of the conditional stores is go...

...gt; >>> 1) >>> I noticed that even if I set xxx to 0 or even a very small negative >>> number, many functions are eliminated. I am wondering if these functions >>> are inlined by the frontend, or identified as deadcode. >>> >>> For instance, SPEC2k bzip2 has 79 functions, after these two steps, only >>> 61 functions are left. no other optimizations are used. >>> >>> 2) >>> I noticed that the inlining condition (in Transforms/IPO/InlineSimple.cpp) >>> is tested during llvm-gcc but not during the...

On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > The 'pthread_once' is located in the native library binary file: > /usr/lib/libpthread.a. I've also included the path to the library in > LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH environment variable. If libpthread.a is a static library, lli won't be successful loading it. Try relinking lli, but add this to its tools/lli/Makefile: TOOLLINKOPTS :=

Dear guys, I've got SPEC2000, and now I am trying to run the tests with it. What I am doing to test it is to configure the test with --enable-spec2000=<directory>, and then I call "make TEST=nightly report.html". I would like to test only the files on SPEC, so I would like to know if any of you guys has an example makefile that tests only the SPEC benchmarks and could

...rg> > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the > loop vectorizer > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results > will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6 > on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%) > improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a > conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. > > > > Regarding the cost model, I think the vectorizer's modeli...

...rg> > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the > loop vectorizer > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results > will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6 > on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%) > improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a > conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. > > > > Regarding the cost model, I think the vectorizer's modeli...

...t lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer Hi Michael, Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6 on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%) improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. Regarding the cost model, I think the vectorizer's modeling of the conditional stores is go...

...alarized conditional stores in the >> loop vectorizer >> >> >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> >> >> Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the >> results will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with >> spec2k/2k6 on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a >> large (30%) improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that >> benchmark has a conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. >> >> >> >> Regarding the cost model, I think the vect...

...t lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer Hi Michael, Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6 on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%) improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a conditional store, so I expected it to benefit. Regarding the cost model, I think the vectorizer's modeling of the conditional stores is go...