Displaying 20 results from an estimated 53 matches for "spec'ed".
Did you mean:
spec'd
2011 Dec 05
5
Spec'ing a block
Hi folks
How would you spec something like this:
as_user username do
FileUtils.chmod_R 0755, "#{directory}/*"
end
Where as_user fires off a new process (and set uid to username).
It seems that this won''t catch FileUtils.chmod_R:
FileUtils.should_receive(:chmod_R).with(0755, "#{@domain...
2018 Feb 12
4
[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/virtio: Add window server support
...ers into it, exports the buffer as dma-buf
> > (DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD), passes this to the wayland server
> > (again including meta data of course).
> >
> > Is that correct?
>
> Both are correct descriptions of typical behaviors. But it isn't spec'ed
> anywhere who has to do the buffer allocation.
Well, according to Pekka's reply it is spec'ed that way, for the
existing buffer types. So for server allocated buffers you need
(a) a wayland protocol extension and (b) support for the extension
in the clients.
> That's to...
2018 Feb 12
4
[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/virtio: Add window server support
...ers into it, exports the buffer as dma-buf
> > (DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD), passes this to the wayland server
> > (again including meta data of course).
> >
> > Is that correct?
>
> Both are correct descriptions of typical behaviors. But it isn't spec'ed
> anywhere who has to do the buffer allocation.
Well, according to Pekka's reply it is spec'ed that way, for the
existing buffer types. So for server allocated buffers you need
(a) a wayland protocol extension and (b) support for the extension
in the clients.
> That's to...
2018 Mar 22
2
[ovirt-users] GlusterFS performance with only one drive per host?
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Jayme <jaymef at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm spec'ing a new oVirt build using three Dell R720's w/ 256GB. I'm
> considering storage options. I don't have a requirement for high amounts
> of storage, I have a little over 1TB to store but want some overhead so I'm
> thinking 2TB of usable space would be sufficient.
>...
2020 Nov 15
2
[patch] enhancement for tika server protected by user/password basic auth
...ple taht is
protected by ip restrictions via a proxy in front of it.
I've configured a tika server behind an apache proxy which enforces
basic auth, but sending basic auth credentials for a tika server is not
currently supported by Dovecot.
The following patch allows to have user and password specified in the
fts_tika url in much the same way you can for fts_solr.
fts_tika = https://user:password at tika_host/tika
John
--- dovecot-2.3.11.3-orig/src/plugins/fts/fts-parser-tika.c????
2020-08-12 14:20:41.000000000 +0200
+++ dovecot-2.3.11.3/src/plugins/fts/fts-parser-tika.c? 2020-11-15
15:18...
2008 Mar 18
3
capacity
Hi,
I am planning to deploy an Asterisk system to supply 4-6,000 students with
voicemail capabilities. The system will be set up with non-DIDs, route
incoming calls to voicemail, then send an email notification. Anyone with
some ideas on how I should go about spec'ing the server this use?
- Eve Ellen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080318/53b2ea1f/attachment.htm
2001 Oct 13
1
small bug
...g correctly-formed
headers (but would would bomb or give garbled poetry as it reads past the
short end-of-packet).
Of course, to add 8-bit clean data, one has to muck with vc.user_comments
directly, since no easy way to add an 8-bit-clean comment is provided
by the current API.
Anyway, either the spec or the code has to change. I hope it's the code,
so I can make my totally unworthy t-shirt claim. And yah, I realize the
comment tools don't handle the spec'ed 8-bit cleanliness yet either.
Erik.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http...
2018 Feb 13
0
[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/virtio: Add window server support
...the buffer as dma-buf
>>> (DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD), passes this to the wayland server
>>> (again including meta data of course).
>>>
>>> Is that correct?
>>
>> Both are correct descriptions of typical behaviors. But it isn't spec'ed
>> anywhere who has to do the buffer allocation.
>
> Well, according to Pekka's reply it is spec'ed that way, for the
> existing buffer types. So for server allocated buffers you need
> (a) a wayland protocol extension and (b) support for the extension
> in the...
2018 Jun 08
3
vanilla build of 7.7p1 release on linux/4.17 fails with gcc8 @ "/usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,-z,retpolineplt'"
One difference I notice is that in your failing example you are
invoking /usr/bin/ld directly to link:
/usr/bin/ld -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o
sshtty.o sshconnect.o sshconnect2.o mux.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/
-Wl,-z,retpolineplt -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,noexecstack
-fstack-protector-strong -pie -lssh -lopenbsd-compat -lutil -lz
-lcrypt -lresolv
whereas my example is
2018 May 29
2
Q: Samba4 AD DC & small office file sharing
...everything starts slowing
> down, then it would be time to add a separate fileserver.
> Stop me if I am wrong, but didn't a certain company produce something
> called an SBS ??
Yeah you're right. The main thing to do I think is set expectations
appropriately. e.g. for a so-and-so spec'ed machine, you can expect
x authentications per/second and y IO operations per second simultaneously.
Problem is, I have no idea what x and y are :-).
2018 Feb 06
5
[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/virtio: Add window server support
Hi,
> > Hmm? I'm assuming the wayland client (in the guest) talks to the
> > wayland proxy, using the wayland protocol, like it would talk to a
> > wayland display server. Buffers must be passed from client to
> > server/proxy somehow, probably using fd passing, so where is the
> > problem?
> >
> > Or did I misunderstand the role of the proxy?
>
2018 Feb 06
5
[PATCH v3 1/2] drm/virtio: Add window server support
Hi,
> > Hmm? I'm assuming the wayland client (in the guest) talks to the
> > wayland proxy, using the wayland protocol, like it would talk to a
> > wayland display server. Buffers must be passed from client to
> > server/proxy somehow, probably using fd passing, so where is the
> > problem?
> >
> > Or did I misunderstand the role of the proxy?
>
2018 May 29
3
Q: Samba4 AD DC & small office file sharing
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 02:47:24PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 09:21:01 -0400
> Marco Shmerykowsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > In lieu of virtualization, I wouldn't be opposed to some
> > small, inexpensive appliance type device (sort of like
> > the Netgate firewalls that run pfsense).
> >
2018 Jun 08
4
vanilla build of 7.7p1 release on linux/4.17 fails with gcc8 @ "/usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,-z,retpolineplt'"
On 8 June 2018 at 10:52, PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> So, there's a problem for OpenSSH build with spec'ing LD=/usr/bin/ld ?
in this particular case, apparently yes. not generally, though.
[...]
> What's *intended* re: openssh? Support for LD=ld or only =gcc, or undef'd ?
Well the intent is you should be able to set CC and LD to whatever you
want as long as they work. In this cas...
2011 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: How should Clang/LLVM runtime libraries be installed and found during link steps?
...ies along with Clang.
I've CC'ed llvmdev on this for compiler-rt developers' input.
The key issues I see when locating runtime libraries are the following:
- These libraries should be shipped with Clang, not installed separately on
the system.
- They are likely to be somewhat tied to specific versions of Clang/LLVM.
- To support cross-compiling, we should be able to install multiple copies
of these libraries in a single Clang installation, and use the appropriate
one when targeting a particular platform.
- The above cross-compiling concern extends to ABI compatibility -- many of
the...
2020 Nov 15
2
[patch] enhancement for tika server protected by user/password basic auth
...n't pass auth creds in dovecot" bit.
> thx! for the patch; hopefully the premise/patch will get picked up.
> (ya-request for a proper @dovecot public bug/issue queue!)
>
> have you found any other 'magic required' to get solr & tika indexing
> text/attachments, respectively, in Dovecot context?
> is it as straightforward as spec'ing the 'fts_solr' & 'fts_tika' urls,
> and Dovecot does the passing-around correctly?
I've just started using tika myself, but from my tests, it's as simple
as adding fts_tika to a working solr int...
2016 Sep 06
10
Recommended computer resources to build llvm
I've got a i7 with 12 logical cores and 16GB of RAM I successfully
built RELEASE_390/final but for the last 100 or so files I'd to use
"ninja -j2" so as not to keep from swapping in the best case and and
in the worst case the build kills itself without completing because
apparently its run out of memory.
For the first 3200 files or so it was doing just fine with
2017 Sep 08
0
cyrus spool on btrfs?
...;ve said, we process 600 million messages a
> month, on primary SSDs in a VMWare cluster, with mechanical storage for
> older, archived user mail.? Archived, may not be exactly correct, but
> the context should be clear.
>
One thing to note, which I'm aware of because I was recently spec'ing out
a Dell server: Dell, at least, offers two kinds of SSDs, one for heavy
write, I think it was, and one for equal r/w. You might dig into that.
>>
>> But mdadm does, the impact is severe.? I know there are ppl saying
>> otherwise, but I?ve seen the impact myself, and I d...
2020 Nov 15
0
[patch] enhancement for tika server protected by user/password basic auth
...t gotten to the "can't pass auth creds in dovecot" bit.
thx! for the patch; hopefully the premise/patch will get picked up.
(ya-request for a proper @dovecot public bug/issue queue!)
have you found any other 'magic required' to get solr & tika indexing text/attachments, respectively, in Dovecot context?
is it as straightforward as spec'ing the 'fts_solr' & 'fts_tika' urls, and Dovecot does the passing-around correctly?
2018 May 29
0
Q: Samba4 AD DC & small office file sharing
...lowing down, then it would be time to add a
> > separate fileserver. Stop me if I am wrong, but didn't a certain
> > company produce something called an SBS ??
>
> Yeah you're right. The main thing to do I think is set expectations
> appropriately. e.g. for a so-and-so spec'ed machine, you can expect
> x authentications per/second and y IO operations per second
> simultaneously.
>
> Problem is, I have no idea what x and y are :-).
No and nobody else does and we never will do, if we keep saying 'do not
use a DC as a fileserver'.
Rowland