search for: spearheading

Hi, I am a student in archaeology with some interest in statistics and R. Recently I've obtained the permission to distribute in the public domain a small dataset (named "spearheads" with 40 obs. of 14 variables) that was used in an introductory statistics book for archaeologists (published in 1994). I've rewritten most of the exercises of that book in R and made them

...g with older C++ toolchains. It also would have the benefit of removing divergence between LLVM sub-projects already using C++11 features. As they have grown in popularity and as code moves back and forth across project boundaries, I think this is a growing strain. > > Awesome, thank you for spearheading this discussion. We really need to move to some C++'11 support, it is just a question of how and when. We also had a discussion from a few months ago about this, can you summarize where we left off? I thought there was a tentative plan for LLVM 3.4 (or maybe it was after 3.4 branched). I ha...

What is he most recent version of R known to run reliably in an environment of IBM HPC cluster Power8 systems, Ubuntu 16.04.1 operating environment with gpfs as the cluster file-system? It would seem from 'apt' checking to be R-3.2.3; however, that one is rather old and does not support a sufficient number of R packages that are needed for current university research projects. R-3.5.1 has

> On 27 Sep 2017, at 8:21 pm, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com> wrote: > > Hi there, > > any news on coordination? We have customers who are successfully using > Mesa in their products, and that are now asking about OpenCL. None yet, I’m still waiting for IWOCL to spearhead the coordination. > My current impression is that easiest would be to do what Tom

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> > On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev >> > <llvm-dev at

Is there a user guide for Comedian Mail? I need to give some training materials to my end users. So far, I have been unable to find anything through google or the Digium site. THanks, Wiley The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev < lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> That's what concerns me about going to the scheme Richard and Rafael >

below is the press release that went out today :) it was great to see a lot of you at the summit today... jack. ------------- Beta Version of Vorbis Released, led by iCAST Developers Free, Open Source Alternative to MP3 Codec Gains Early Support from iCAST, Sonique, EMusic, Napster, Etrantrum, Panic and XMMS San Diego, CA - June 20, 2000 - Project Vorbis, spearheaded by developers from

below is the press release that went out today :) it was great to see a lot of you at the summit today... jack. ------------- Beta Version of Vorbis Released, led by iCAST Developers Free, Open Source Alternative to MP3 Codec Gains Early Support from iCAST, Sonique, EMusic, Napster, Etrantrum, Panic and XMMS San Diego, CA - June 20, 2000 - Project Vorbis, spearheaded by developers from

On 07/31/2017 02:30 PM, Nicholas Wilson via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On 31 Jul 2017, at 3:23 pm, Neil Henning <ll... at duskborn.com> wrote: > > Moving forward, other than securing the triples spirv32, spirv64, and spirvlogical from LLVM, how can we go about coordinating efforts? I feel that having one backend is a better use of everybody’s time than having three. If we

On Jun 27, 2016, at 4:57 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> Eh, if we're switching to a completely unrelated versioning scheme, it >> doesn't seem completely unreasonable. >> >> We could also count how many time-based releases we have had and use that... >> >> :: shrug :: >> >> I think counting from 4 or counting from

Bill, On 21 February 2019 at 15:14, Bill Glessner wrote: | What is he most recent version of R known to run reliably in an environment of IBM HPC cluster Power8 systems, Ubuntu 16.04.1 operating environment with gpfs as the cluster file-system? It would seem from 'apt' checking to be R-3.2.3; however, that one is rather old and does not support a sufficient number of R packages that are

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.63 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- In fact, there does not appear to be any consideration of rsyslogd's behavior. Attached is a rule to ignore restarts. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 Debian Release: lenny/sid 990 testing ftp.debian.org 600 unstable

On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 August 2013 19:18, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: >> I am hoping that this proposal will generate a lot of feedback, and there >> are many different topics to discuss. When replying to this email, please >> change the subject header to something more

Marek ?ervenka wrote: > and what about > https://www.asterisk-blog.com/2016/02/17/odbc_gutting/ While not in the email these are listed in the CHANGES and UPGRADE.txt file. Going forward we'll try to ensure we include such things in the release notes as well. -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at:

Making data, especially data that have been the subject of published papers, widely available, can be a useful spinoff from the R project, another gift to the scientific community beyond the provision of computing and analytic tools. Nowadays, in a complete publication of a scientific result, there is every reason for the data to be part of that publication. The Gentleman and Lang 2004

I’d like to second what Owen said. Thanks very much for the hard work on this, and I think that you’re picking up from a pretty good place with the document itself. – Steve > On May 5, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Owen Anderson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Chandler, > > I wanted to take a moment to thank you and Phil for your work on this document, and to

Hi LLVMers, We're actively working on finishing up the release, which has been delayed. Last week was dominated by several paper submissions which were all due at about the same time, so the release fell behind (if you're interested, the papers are available on the main page). We are currently shooting for getting the release out the door early next week. That said, we have made a lot

...& Clang with older C++ toolchains. It also would have the benefit of removing divergence between LLVM sub-projects already using C++11 features. As they have grown in popularity and as code moves back and forth across project boundaries, I think this is a growing strain. Awesome, thank you for spearheading this discussion. We really need to move to some C++'11 support, it is just a question of how and when. We also had a discussion from a few months ago about this, can you summarize where we left off? I thought there was a tentative plan for LLVM 3.4 (or maybe it was after 3.4 branched). &gt...

We asked Henning Schulzrinne (the author of RTP and currently the RTP/AVG maintainer) about getting a static RTP payload type code assigned for Speex, since we meet the criteria in rfc1890. He said no. Here is his answer: On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Henning Schulzrinne wrote: > Sorry, this is not going to happen, regardless of the codec or its > merit. See the new draft which will replace RFC