search for: spearhead

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 36 matches for "spearhead".

2008 Dec 03
1
adding a new dataset to the default R distribution
Hi, I am a student in archaeology with some interest in statistics and R. Recently I've obtained the permission to distribute in the public domain a small dataset (named "spearheads" with 40 obs. of 14 variables) that was used in an introductory statistics book for archaeologists (published in 1994). I've rewritten most of the exercises of that book in R and made them available at http://wiki.iosa.it/diggingnumbers:start along with the original dataset, but I was w...
2013 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...g with older C++ toolchains. It also would have the benefit of removing divergence between LLVM sub-projects already using C++11 features. As they have grown in popularity and as code moves back and forth across project boundaries, I think this is a growing strain. > > Awesome, thank you for spearheading this discussion. We really need to move to some C++'11 support, it is just a question of how and when. We also had a discussion from a few months ago about this, can you summarize where we left off? I thought there was a tentative plan for LLVM 3.4 (or maybe it was after 3.4 branched). I...
2019 Feb 21
2
Most recent version R for IBM Power8 Ubuntu environment
What is he most recent version of R known to run reliably in an environment of IBM HPC cluster Power8 systems, Ubuntu 16.04.1 operating environment with gpfs as the cluster file-system? It would seem from 'apt' checking to be R-3.2.3; however, that one is rather old and does not support a sufficient number of R packages that are needed for current university research projects. R-3.5.1 has
2017 Sep 27
0
[SPIR-V] SPIR-V in LLVM
...; On 27 Sep 2017, at 8:21 pm, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com> wrote: > > Hi there, > > any news on coordination? We have customers who are successfully using > Mesa in their products, and that are now asking about OpenCL. None yet, I’m still waiting for IWOCL to spearhead the coordination. > My current impression is that easiest would be to do what Tom suggested > before, and only re-evaluate inclusion in LLVM proper once things are > more mature. > > One path for me would be to take Khronos' or Nic's work and convert it > into something...
2016 Jun 27
0
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
...ible. When we branch for 3.9, my plan is to bump trunk to 3.10, and then focus my attention on getting 3.9 into a good state and shipping it. After the branch, if someone wants to promote trunk to 4.0 because of a feature, or because the 3-series is "done", go ahead. If someone wants to spearhead getting us onto a scheme where we increment major for each release, that's fine too, but I'm not going to drive it. Thanks everyone for participating in the discussion. Hopefully this result is not too disappointing. Cheers, Hans
2004 Oct 06
7
Comedian Mail User Guide
Is there a user guide for Comedian Mail? I need to give some training materials to my end users. So far, I have been unable to find anything through google or the Digium site. THanks, Wiley The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
2016 Jun 27
2
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev < lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> That's what concerns me about going to the scheme Richard and Rafael >
2000 Jun 20
1
iCAST Announces Beta Release of Vorbis (fwd)
...see a lot of you at the summit today... jack. ------------- Beta Version of Vorbis Released, led by iCAST Developers Free, Open Source Alternative to MP3 Codec Gains Early Support from iCAST, Sonique, EMusic, Napster, Etrantrum, Panic and XMMS San Diego, CA - June 20, 2000 - Project Vorbis, spearheaded by developers from iCAST (www.icast.com), an online entertainment and majority-owned operating company of CMGI, today announced the Beta release of Vorbis, a high-quality open source audio compression/decompression format (codec) that is expected to provide a royalty-free alternative to MP3 and o...
2000 Jun 20
1
iCAST Announces Beta Release of Vorbis (fwd)
...see a lot of you at the summit today... jack. ------------- Beta Version of Vorbis Released, led by iCAST Developers Free, Open Source Alternative to MP3 Codec Gains Early Support from iCAST, Sonique, EMusic, Napster, Etrantrum, Panic and XMMS San Diego, CA - June 20, 2000 - Project Vorbis, spearheaded by developers from iCAST (www.icast.com), an online entertainment and majority-owned operating company of CMGI, today announced the Beta release of Vorbis, a high-quality open source audio compression/decompression format (codec) that is expected to provide a royalty-free alternative to MP3 and o...
2017 Sep 27
4
[SPIR-V] SPIR-V in LLVM
On 07/31/2017 02:30 PM, Nicholas Wilson via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On 31 Jul 2017, at 3:23 pm, Neil Henning <ll... at duskborn.com> wrote: > > Moving forward, other than securing the triples spirv32, spirv64, and spirvlogical from LLVM, how can we go about coordinating efforts? I feel that having one backend is a better use of everybody’s time than having three. If we
2016 Jun 28
5
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
...3.9, my plan is to bump trunk to 3.10, and then > focus my attention on getting 3.9 into a good state and shipping it. > > After the branch, if someone wants to promote trunk to 4.0 because of > a feature, or because the 3-series is "done", go ahead. If someone > wants to spearhead getting us onto a scheme where we increment major > for each release, that's fine too, but I'm not going to drive it. > > Thanks everyone for participating in the discussion. Hopefully this > result is not too disappointing. I continue to think that 3.10 is the least defensibl...
2019 Feb 26
0
Most recent version R for IBM Power8 Ubuntu environment
...d (IIRC) get R 3.4.4. What is at CRAN as backports is provided by volunteers on shoestring budgets. Hence almost everything you see there is for x86_64. (Johannes backports Debian builds to arm as well as he has need for it). So for Power8 help ... we can help with tips but I fear you may have to spearhead. The good news is that it should not be hard. Hth, Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
2008 Feb 03
3
Bug#463793: rsyslogd restarts are not ignored
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.63 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- In fact, there does not appear to be any consideration of rsyslogd's behavior. Attached is a rule to ignore restarts. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 Debian Release: lenny/sid 990 testing ftp.debian.org 600 unstable
2013 Aug 12
1
[LLVMdev] [global-isel] Proposal for a global instruction selector
On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 August 2013 19:18, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: >> I am hoping that this proposal will generate a lot of feedback, and there >> are many different topics to discuss. When replying to this email, please >> change the subject header to something more
2016 Mar 30
2
Asterisk 13.8.0 Now Available
Marek ?ervenka wrote: > and what about > https://www.asterisk-blog.com/2016/02/17/odbc_gutting/ While not in the email these are listed in the CHANGES and UPGRADE.txt file. Going forward we'll try to ensure we include such things in the release notes as well. -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at:
2008 Dec 05
0
R] adding a new dataset to the default R distribution
...ject.org > Subject: [R] adding a new dataset to the default R distribution > > > Hi, > I am a student in archaeology with some interest in statistics and R. > > Recently I've obtained the permission to distribute in the public > domain > a small dataset (named "spearheads" with 40 obs. of 14 variables) > that > was used in an introductory statistics book for archaeologists > (published in 1994). > > I've rewritten most of the exercises of that book in R and made them > available at http://wiki.iosa.it/diggingnumbers:start along with th...
2016 May 05
2
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
I’d like to second what Owen said. Thanks very much for the hard work on this, and I think that you’re picking up from a pretty good place with the document itself. – Steve > On May 5, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Owen Anderson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Chandler, > > I wanted to take a moment to thank you and Phil for your work on this document, and to
2003 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Status Update
...://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CommandGuide/ 5. There is now a new tail recursion elimination pass. 6. Misha improved the bytecode loader to be able to load individual functions on demand. This is useful for things like the JIT, although nothing is currently using the new capabilities. 7. Misha spearheaded the Great LLVM Tool Renaming project: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-September/000495.html The old 'as,dis,link' tools are now 'llvm-as,llvm-dis,llvm-link' 8. Bill Wendling contributed an improvement to the switch lowering pass, which changes it to emit a...
2013 Oct 27
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...& Clang with older C++ toolchains. It also would have the benefit of removing divergence between LLVM sub-projects already using C++11 features. As they have grown in popularity and as code moves back and forth across project boundaries, I think this is a growing strain. Awesome, thank you for spearheading this discussion. We really need to move to some C++'11 support, it is just a question of how and when. We also had a discussion from a few months ago about this, can you summarize where we left off? I thought there was a tentative plan for LLVM 3.4 (or maybe it was after 3.4 branched)....
2004 Aug 06
2
No Static Payload Type
...aft goes into more detail as to why this decision was taken. <p>This was expected, but several people wanted us to ask. We did, they said no. So, we have to continue to define the out-of-band means to agree upon a codec, as we have been doing. There are discussions happening with the ITU (spearheaded by Roger Hardiman and the folks at Equivalence, who do the OpenH323 Project) regarding an agreed upon means in ITU-T recommendations H.323/H.245 to negotiate payload mappings. Roger has asked that we wait to update our draft profile until we get some answers back from the ITU. This is expected...