Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "spdiff".
Did you mean:
spdif
1999 Nov 10
1
plot() bugs (PR#317)
Full_Name: Bill Simpson
Version: 65.1
OS: Linux Redhat 6.1
Submission from: (NULL) (193.62.250.209)
Try this:
#default plot symbols and lettering are too small, need to scale up
par(cex=2,mex=.7)
par(mar=c(5,5,1,1))
spdiff<-c(1,2,3,4,5)
dpdet<-c(1,2,3,4,5)/10
dpsp<-c(2,3,4,5,6)/10
dpdir<-c(2,4,6,8,10)/10
plot(spdiff,dpdet,pch=15,ylim=c(0,max(dpdet,dpsp,dpdir)),xlab="Speed
difference$
points(spdiff,dpdir,pch=16)
points(spdiff,dpsp,pch=17)
Bugs:
1. The y-axis numbering labels are shifted down and are...
2008 Apr 21
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
...// parameters; handle those later so we know how much padding
we need.
+ nAltivecParamsAtEnd++;
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Varargs and 64-bit Altivec parameters are padded to 16 byte
boundary.
+ NumBytes = ((NumBytes+15)/16)*16;
No need for else here. :-)
+ int SPDiff = 0;
+
+ PPCFunctionInfo *FI =
DAG.getMachineFunction().getInfo<PPCFunctionInfo>();
+ unsigned CallerMinReservedArea = FI->getMinReservedArea();
+ SPDiff = (int)CallerMinReservedArea - (int)ParamSize;
Just change last statement to
int SPDiff = (int)...
+bool
+PPCTargetLowering::IsE...
2008 Apr 16
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
Hello Dale,
this is an updated version of the tail call optimization patch for
powerpc. could you have a look at it?
i added code to support ppc64 (untested, will try to get access to
ppc64 on a friend's machine).
incorporated evan's formatting suggestions. ;)
will run another round of testing (llvm-test) on my powerpc g4/800
when i get the okay to commit. testing on this machine takes
2008 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
> More nitpicks:
> ...
> No need for else here. :-)
Done
> SPDiff = (int)CallerMinReservedArea - (int)ParamSize;
>
> Just change last statement to
> int SPDiff = (int)...
Done
>
> +bool
> +PPCTargetLowering::IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(SDOperand Call,
> + SDOperand Ret,
> +...
2008 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
On Apr 22, 2008, at 4:58 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com>
> wrote:
>> More nitpicks:
>> ...
>> No need for else here. :-)
> Done
>> SPDiff = (int)CallerMinReservedArea - (int)ParamSize;
>>
>> Just change last statement to
>> int SPDiff = (int)...
> Done
>>
>> +bool
>> +PPCTargetLowering::IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(SDOperand Call,
>> +...