search for: spdiff

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "spdiff".

Did you mean: spdif
1999 Nov 10
1
plot() bugs (PR#317)
Full_Name: Bill Simpson Version: 65.1 OS: Linux Redhat 6.1 Submission from: (NULL) (193.62.250.209) Try this: #default plot symbols and lettering are too small, need to scale up par(cex=2,mex=.7) par(mar=c(5,5,1,1)) spdiff<-c(1,2,3,4,5) dpdet<-c(1,2,3,4,5)/10 dpsp<-c(2,3,4,5,6)/10 dpdir<-c(2,4,6,8,10)/10 plot(spdiff,dpdet,pch=15,ylim=c(0,max(dpdet,dpsp,dpdir)),xlab="Speed difference$ points(spdiff,dpdir,pch=16) points(spdiff,dpsp,pch=17) Bugs: 1. The y-axis numbering labels are shifted down and are...
2008 Apr 21
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
...// parameters; handle those later so we know how much padding we need. + nAltivecParamsAtEnd++; + continue; + } + // Varargs and 64-bit Altivec parameters are padded to 16 byte boundary. + NumBytes = ((NumBytes+15)/16)*16; No need for else here. :-) + int SPDiff = 0; + + PPCFunctionInfo *FI = DAG.getMachineFunction().getInfo<PPCFunctionInfo>(); + unsigned CallerMinReservedArea = FI->getMinReservedArea(); + SPDiff = (int)CallerMinReservedArea - (int)ParamSize; Just change last statement to int SPDiff = (int)... +bool +PPCTargetLowering::IsE...
2008 Apr 16
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
Hello Dale, this is an updated version of the tail call optimization patch for powerpc. could you have a look at it? i added code to support ppc64 (untested, will try to get access to ppc64 on a friend's machine). incorporated evan's formatting suggestions. ;) will run another round of testing (llvm-test) on my powerpc g4/800 when i get the okay to commit. testing on this machine takes
2008 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > More nitpicks: > ... > No need for else here. :-) Done > SPDiff = (int)CallerMinReservedArea - (int)ParamSize; > > Just change last statement to > int SPDiff = (int)... Done > > +bool > +PPCTargetLowering::IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(SDOperand Call, > + SDOperand Ret, > +...
2008 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
On Apr 22, 2008, at 4:58 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> > wrote: >> More nitpicks: >> ... >> No need for else here. :-) > Done >> SPDiff = (int)CallerMinReservedArea - (int)ParamSize; >> >> Just change last statement to >> int SPDiff = (int)... > Done >> >> +bool >> +PPCTargetLowering::IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(SDOperand Call, >> +...