Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "spammage".
Did you mean:
flammage
2013 Feb 08
0
[LLVMdev] JIT on armhf
On 8 February 2013 14:28, David Given <dg at cowlark.com> wrote:
> Debian's clang packages are totally broken on armhf --- the compiler
> emits a confused warning about the platform being unrecognised, and then
> generates softfloat code --- so I was wondering about LLVM itself.
I'm using Ubuntu on Pandas and Chromebooks and LLVM itself behaves well,
with the right set of
2013 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] JIT on armhf
...ystem /usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf
-internal-externc-isystem /usr/include -O3 -ferror-limit 19
-fmessage-length 80 -fno-signed-char -fgnu-runtime
-fobjc-runtime-has-arc -fobjc-runtime-has-weak -fobjc-fragile-abi
-fdiagnostics-show-option -fcolor-diagnostics -o test.s -x c test.c
(Sorry for the spammage, but I thought it better to snip too little than
too much...)
I'm particularly curious about the way that the triple passed into the
compiler backend starts 'armv4t' when it's rejected as a CPU type if I
specify it manually.
[...]
> If that works, it's possible that you'...
2013 Feb 08
6
[LLVMdev] JIT on armhf
Renato Golin wrote:
[...]
> Try setting armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and see if it works better.
No, that doesn't work either.
[...]
> JIT was never the forte of ARM and I haven't tried yet, but I doubt
> it'll be any Debian misconfiguration. The whole architecture
> configuration is a bit odd...
Debian's clang packages are totally broken on armhf --- the compiler