search for: spamhead

Hi all, I am having a small problem with a catch-all user I have setup in my Postfix/Dovecot setup. I am not 100% sure this is Dovecot related, but, logic tells me it is. I have a virtual user called @reinhold.dk setup to redirect to my main account, peter at reinhold.dk. If I send a spam mail (GTUBE) to peter at reinhold.dk, the mail is marked with Amavis x-headers as it should be. If I

I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I misunderstanding the design? I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: filter "spam_filter"; if spamheaders { fileinto "spam"; stop; } Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered version into my inbox. Based on the filter RFC, I was ex...

...ef Adam Weinberger: >> I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I >> misunderstanding the design? >> >> I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: >> >> filter "spam_filter"; >> if spamheaders { >> fileinto "spam"; >> stop; >> } >> >> Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the >> implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an >> explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered v...

Hi Folks, I downloaded Samba2.0alpha8 from Samba site. Compiled it and installed it on the Solaris 2.6 unix box. I set up domain logon for both Windows 98 clients and WinNT. There is no problem logging on from Windows98 and the shares are all working alright. Then, I followed Samba NTDOM FAQ and add the NT workstation name into /etc/passwd and smbpasswd (using smbpasswd -a -m

...12/19/2017 om 8:41 AM schreef Adam Weinberger: > I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I > misunderstanding the design? > > I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: > > filter "spam_filter"; > if spamheaders { > ??? fileinto "spam"; > ??? stop; > } > > Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the > implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an > explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered version into my > inbox. &...

...> I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I >>> misunderstanding the design? >>> >>> I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this: >>> >>> filter "spam_filter"; >>> if spamheaders { >>> ??? fileinto "spam"; >>> ??? stop; >>> } >>> >>> Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the >>> implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an >>> explicit `keep;` to the e...