search for: spamc

On 17.04.18 12:38, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > > On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation at >> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve >> >> I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-learn-ham.sh should >> use revoke instead of report for --ham messages? >> >> I started using imapsieve with sp...

Thank you for your helpful hints on debugging this issue. I wanted first to get the mail which generates this error but unfortunately the user already deleted it as well from his trash. Now I got another hint and it looks like this mail had a big attachment to it. Is it possible that spamc generated this error due to the size of the mail? Regards ML On Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:29 AM, Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, ML mail wrote: It would be better to have the original questio...

Hello! I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation at https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-learn-ham.sh should use revoke instead of report for --ham messages? I started using imapsieve with spamc myself just a few weeks ago, but I haven't...

I just discovered that my spam filters are not being properly executed in CentOS 5.3 because when procmail attempts to invoke spamc. I have spamd running properly, and can invoke spamassassin and spamc from the bash prompt manually without any issues, however procmail fails with "permission denied" then bails. Watching the procmail.log I get the following: procmail: Executing "/usr/bin/spamc" /bin/sh:...

I'm trying to get the pipe backend to work with the new dovecot-antispam (I was very pleased to see the new version, thanks Johannes!) Before I would run the following over the maildir: spamc -d 10.0.1.109 -L ham < $file 2>&1 > /dev/null now, i'm using dovecot-antispam and mdbox and have the following configured: antispam_backend = pipe antispam_signature = X-Spam-Flag antispam_signature_missing = error antispam_trash_pattern = trash;Trash;Deleted * antispam_spam_patt...

I'm using maildrop to filter mail like: xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc" xfilter "/usr/bin/bogofilter -ep" I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?

...\Junk } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = INBOX. separator = . } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/master-users driver = passwd-file master = yes pass = yes } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } plugin { antispam_backend = pipe antispam_pipe_program = /usr/bin/spamc antispam_pipe_program_args = -d;my-mx-server.domain.com;-u;amavis antispam_pipe_program_notspam_args = -L;ham antispam_pipe_program_spam_args = -L;spam antispam_pipe_tmpdir = /tmp antispam_signature = X-Spam-Flag antispam_signature_missing = error antispam_spam = INBOX.Spam;INBOX.Junk antispam_tras...

On 17.04.18 12:40, Reio Remma wrote: > On 17.04.18 12:38, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> >> >> >> On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation >>> at https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve >>> >>> I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-learn-ham.sh should >>> use revoke instead of report for --ham messages? >>> >>> I started...

Thanks to your help Steffen I was able to find out the issue which was simply the size of the Spam mail as you can see here: spamc[16545]: skipped message, greater than max message size (512000 bytes) The spam mail was around 900 kbytes as such I have changed the spamc limit to 1MB. Bastard spammer who abuses this limit by attaching a big image... Regards ML On Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:23 PM, ML mail <mlnospam...

Hi, My server uses a system comprised of postfix, dovecot and dspam to filter and deliver mail. Postfix used the following flags in calling spamc and dovecot: flags=DRhu user=dovecot:secmail argv=/usr/bin/spamc -u ${recipient} -e /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient} after an upgrade from Debian lenny to squeeze we were able to get everything working except spam filtering. Spamassassin is able to judge whether the mail coming in is spam...

...heir INBOX (false positive) they get the following error message: >> >> [SERVERBUG] failed to send mail > # 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.8 ext4 [cut] > plugin { > antispam_backend = pipe > antispam_pipe_program = /usr/bin/spamc > antispam_pipe_program_args = -d;my-mx-server.domain.com;-u;amavis > antispam_pipe_program_notspam_args = -L;ham > antispam_pipe_program_spam_args = -L;spam > antispam_pipe_tmpdir = /tmp > antispam_signature = X-Spam-Flag > antispam_signature_missing = error > antispam_spam =...

...s with root rights and can drop privileges to become the specific user for which it is delivering mail. We would now like to run SpamAssassin with the possibility of using the antispam plugin to enable virtual users to train their databases. Do you have an idea how I could let dovecot-lmtp invoke spamc? Or an external command as a filter, to be run by the final user? Thanks, -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; truth isnt."...

On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma wrote: > Hello! > > I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation at > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve > > I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-learn-ham.sh? should use > revoke instead of report for --ham messages? > > I started using imapsieve with spamc myself just a few week...

.... For most applications I selected the default options. By doing this I expected that the packages would play nice with one another and I could customize as necessary. Setting SELinux to enforce I encountered all sorts of problems - but most were resolvable, save for Dovecot, Procmail (for spamc), and an odd one with Apache. Given that these were all installed with the CentOS install defaults, I can't believe I am the only one with these issues but finding a solution has not been self evident. Hoping someone here can help. For Dovecot I get the following: SELinux is preventin...

...this: (...) namespace private { separator = . location = maildir:/var/mail/%u inbox = yes hidden = no } namespace public { separator = . prefix = learn. location = maildir:/var/learn/%u inbox = no hidden = no } (...) plugin { (...) pipe = /var/learn/%u/.spam:spamc -d some.host -L spam pipe2 = /var/learn/%u/.ham:spamc -d some.host -L ham (...) } Would people be interested by such a feature? If enough people show some interest, I can try to convince my boss to let me release this plugin GPL-licensed. Cheers, Nicolas Boullis

...erences became my concern (Bayesian filters and classifier), I realized that spamd should be called by the LDA. With procmail this was a trivial issue, with dovecot-lda I was unable to find any solution on the web or other documentation. So my question is as follows: Is there a way to call spamc from dovecot-LDA (and/or dovecot-sieve), or is there an alternate way to do this for a site with virtual mailboxes configured with dovecot-lda? Thank you all in advance, regards, -- George Mamalakis IT Officer, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessalonik...

Hi, I am trying to deploy dovecot LDA and liking it so far. However, I need to pass the message through some filters before it's delivered to the user (e.g. spamc). I realise I can just set up a chain (postfix delivers to spamc, pipes to foo, pipes to bar, pipes to deliver), but there's no reliable error handling with that approach. Furthermore, I cannot seem to figure out whether sieve can pass messages through external filters, or how you'd do tha...

Sep 5 19:59:21 domain postfix/qmgr[19936]: warning: connect to transport private/spamassassin: Connection refused Pol On 2017-09-05 03:10, Bill Shirley wrote: > Try main.cf: > # dovecot 2.x > mailbox_command = /usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda > -a "$RECIPIENT" -f "$SENDER" -m "$EXTENSION" > > Bill > > > On 9/3/2017 12:33 PM, dovecotml at fuckaround.org wrote: >> Hi all :) >> >> I will try to use /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver instead of p...

...nd possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this for sieve. Basically, what I do now in procmail is 1. Get the listname from the List-ID header (or List-post/List-owner if no ID) 2. check against a list of list-ids and if the ID is not on the list, send it to spamc and put the message (if not spam) in the INBOX but mark it as seen, otherwise put it in Junk. 3. have some list specific rules (like rewriting reply-to, stripping subjected tags, etc. 4. Drop message in mailbox based no the ID. (so, dovecot mail goes into .dovecot/new but RandomFakelist gets sca...