search for: spack

I saw an email about 8.0.1 being not quite out, and planning for 9.0.0. When is 8.0.1 supposed to come out? I installed llvm at develop on x86 on March 30, and its clang says it is version 9.0.0 (trunk 357348). I tried to do another spack install llvm at develop, but it said that I already had it installed. Does that mean there were no changes since March 30, or does spack not look for any changes? I also tried spack install llvm at develop on a POWER9 (ppc641e) machine, but I can not find a compiler that will compile it. gcc 4....

...path to the `which` executable, obtained at the configure stage: > ## hopefully configure found [/usr]/bin/which > which <- "@WHICH@" > if (!nzchar(which)) { > warning("'which' was not found on this platform") This poses a problem for the Spack package manager and software distribution. In Spack, like in Nix, Guix, and GoboLinux, packages live under their own path prefixes, which look like the following: >> /opt/spack/opt/spack/linux-ubuntu18.04-x86_64_v3/gcc-7.5.0/r-4.3.0-eqteloqhjzix6ta373ruzt5imvvbcesc Unfortunately, Spack pack...

...ocation, not to system tools. Cheers, Simon > On Jan 11, 2024, at 10:36 AM, Harmen Stoppels <me at harmenstoppels.nl> wrote: > > For context: I don't think Nix and Guix have to relocate anything, cause I think they require absolute paths like /nix/store where all binaries go. Spack on the other hand can install packages w/o sudo to a location of choice, e.g. ~/spack/opt/spack. That's why we have to patch binaries. > > However, Spack's relocation stuff is not about creating truly relocatable binaries where everything is referenced by relative paths. We still use...

...re, than OpenACC as a user-driven directive-based performance-portable parallel programming model might be a solution. What are the difference of OpenMP and OpenACC directive APIs? OpenACC uses directives to tell the compiler where and how to parallelize loops. You would like to look behind of the Spack Package Manager for HPC Clusters? Get an insight and talk to the Spack developer. Bring order to your software chaos and get how to automate the installation of complex sets of software packages. If you are interested, then register [image: :slightly_smiling_face:] to the special HPC Day <https...

Thank you. > On Jul 3, 2019, at 4:04 AM, Justin Clift <justin at postgresql.org> wrote: > > On 2019-07-01 00:22, Marty Itzkowitz via llvm-dev wrote: >> I also tried spack install llvm at develop on a POWER9 (ppc641e) >> machine, but I can not find a compiler that >> will compile it. gcc 4.8.5 is reported as too old, and gcc 7.3.0 and >> 8.1.0 both fail in the same place: >> >> 9069 /home/msi3/hpct/spack/var/spack/stage/llvm-develop...

Without seeing more details it's impossible to tell, but it might have been me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6102310d814ad73eab60a88b21dd70874f7a056f#diff-0f9a49c4e31c311a0010e126cd785f08 changed PHI node equality check, but there were some users that implicitly depended on the old definition of the PHI equality, and didn't verify their implicit assumptions with reality,

...v1yhBoDZIWsQ4/ (verified) Lets print a failed check: doveadm pw -s CRYPT -V{CRYPT}/uuE/AAAAAAAA Enter new password: Retype new password: reverse password verification check failed FYI the word used for those test cases was "password". Regards, ___ Jimmy Thrasibule <spack.world at gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: user_hash-doveadm-pw.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 1708 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20110901/ce62b6bb/attachment-0004.bin>

I can't seem to get music on hold working, it tries to work, but I just hear strange noises on the extension.. Here is some debug info. Looks like mpg123 starts fine, but I hear nothing. I'm on todays CVS build. -- Executing Answer("SIP/2203-062c", "") in new stack -- Executing MusicOnHold("SIP/2203-062c", "default") in new stack --