Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "southard".
2001 Nov 28
1
rsyncing devices
...py this device over again.
Here's my rsync command:
rsync -avx --delete --exclude=lost+found --exclude=TT_DB \
user@solarisserver::solaris-usr-local/ /solaris/
I've also tried adding the -D flag (which is included in the -a flag).
Anyone with any suggestions?
Thanks,
Cheryl
--
Cheryl Southard
cld@astro.caltech.edu
2020 Jun 24
0
Update on docker Python:3 and adding R:4.x
I want to build a couple of containers by function instead of replicating
even slim images for every single package. My current base image provides
an updated debian and python3 image.
Dave Lange
Kenmore, WA
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:18 PM Sean Southard <sean.m.southard at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dave is there a specific reason you want to install both in one container?
>
> It is somewhat antithetical to the purpose of docker if you don't have a
> direct need.
>
> Also, it sounds like you are making your own python base im...
2015 May 11
1
Foreach %dopar% operator incorrectly load balancing
...ind what's been changed
so it's unclear to me exactly how to proceed. It is almost reminiscent of a
change in the BLAS library but this behavior persists after recompiling R
to not use the shared BLAS lib.
here is the output from lsof -p 23618 | grep 'blas\|lapack'
R 39781 smsouthard mem REG 8,17 3576576
1055038 /usr/local/lib/R/lib/libRlapack.so
R 39781 smsouthard mem REG 8,17 655336
1572936 /usr/lib/libblas/libblas.so.3.0
Output from R CMD ldd /usr/local/lib/R/bin/exec/R
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffca59fd000)
libR.so => /usr/loc...
2017 Apr 19
4
difficulty in Ubuntu 14.04 apt-getting R 3.3.2
Hi:
I have a Dockerfile, which builds an image which installed R 3.3.2 in
Ubuntu 14.04, but building using that Dockerfile seems to have stopped
working and I am unclear why.
I believe the relevant error is:
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet
2007 Apr 06
1
fuzzy-ness to searches
Hi. I didn''t notice if topic has already been discussed, but I was
wondering if there was a way to make ferret match only part of a search
term. My initial thought was some sort of filter, but I''m unsure of
where to begin.
An example in the comments of the acts_as_ferret tutorial at RailsEnvy
(http://www.railsenvy.com/2007/2/19/acts-as-ferret-tutorial) suggests:
To return the