search for: sourcefrog

It would be nifty to incorporate this into R or into an R package: http://sourcefrog.net/projects/natsort/

Hello, Whenever copying files using ssh (scp) from SLES 8 (openssh 3.4p1-263) to another box (e.g SLES 8, Solaris 8, Windows XP), the memory of the initial SLES 8 box gets depleted. To make sure this is true I use the free command whilst copying and see that the used memory reaches 90 / 100%. After the copying is finished this memory is never released. No memory tool can tell me what happened

The attached patch adds an option --drop-suid which caused rsync to drop setuid/setgid permissions from the destination files. ie, even if the source file is setuid, the target file will not be. Added as we want to rsync the same files to machines both inside and outside our firewalls. For machines inside the firewall some files should be suid, for machines outside the firewalls they should

Hi Martin, 2016-01-23 18:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net>: > It seems like yajsync is a reimplementation of rsync's protocol by looking > at the GPL'd C rsync source, but it doesn't actually include any code from > rsync. Is that right? Yes correct, it is a complete rewrite in Java. Most of it is completely different, only so...

...a good idea. The second one is probably a good way to visualize things, and something along those lines ought to be in the programmer's documentation. (By the way, my mail client was temporarily confused and sent mail as "mbp@toey.home", which is obviously wrong; please use samba or sourcefrog.) -- Martin

I am a student in computer science, several weeks ago, i learn the rsync algorithm and i am very interested in it. I use the gdb to debug the rsync,but when i enter the function start_client , I use bt to find the function stacks,but i cannot find the function ,why? and how can i to see the start_client function and continue to debug the function. -------------- next part -------------- HTML

Hi, Please send questions to the list, not to me. On 4 Sep 2003 Atom 'Smasher' <atom@suspicious.org> wrote: > i've been trying to find a good answer for this, but pretty much all > i've found is disagreement on what level of insecurity is > acceptable.... > > the problem arises when trying to use rsync as root. > > obviously, allowing root logins

Jeremy, I'm glad you like rsync. Why does your encryption program not produce a file of the same size every time it is run on the same input? I can see what the patch does, but I'm having a bit of trouble understanding whether it would be generally useful. -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: jeremy bornstein

I have a kvm virtual host running on what will become CentOS 6 with 12GB of memory and a Quad Xeon X5560 2.8Ghz . The store for virtual machines will be a software raid 6 array of 6 disks with an LVM layered on top. I'm not initially planning any major overcommitment of resources, though there could be a need for some overcommitment with a light workload on the guests. In recent years

Hello, Recently while working with rsync as the way to mirror large (several GB) archive on a regular basis, I came across several problems, and also got the ideas about their possible solutions - please could you investigate & consider implementing the features, described below, to future RSYNC releases ? - when the checksumming (consider very large archive, several GB) stage of rsync

Hi everyone, I'm trying to archive to a remote host but the size of the data to copy is prohibitively large to consider doing the sync over the wire (it's TBs of raw video), so i was wondering if it was possible to use a usb attached storage device as the transport medium. Is it possible for rsync to compare the two systems (over the network) finding any newer or different files on the

Hi Andrey, 2016-01-23 4:02 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua>: ... > If they don't want to bother with just discussing, why would they take a > big effort to claim? And your proposition for LGPL is not very > different in opposite to BSD or public domain. Yes, I agree. The risk of having a future lawsuit against my project would be pretty small if I

... > Getting the approval for a relicensing I think the contributions to > rsync have to be analyzed in detail to approach a reasonable number of > contributors. > > I experienced that finding a responsible person that is willing to > discuss such a case in an organization that contributed source code is > nearly impossible. > > Looking at the source code (my short

A little patch to add Wx::GenericDirCtrl. A non-native control (on OS X at least) but maybe useful to someone. I have tested it but think it should just be added to controls.rb sample - will do later when i have fixed some other probs with that. Also, I''ve started putting class-specifc style constants in the relevant .i file, as discussed previosuly - will submit a patch doing this

Just as background information: our spam filter caught 14000 attempted spams in the last two weeks. Suggestions on blocking more are welcome but the vast majority is already blocked. I think we removed the @samba.org whitelist. -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc:

Begin forwarded message: > From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@twibright.com> > Date: 7 March 2006 18:01:43 > To: Martin Pool <mbp@samba.org> > Subject: Delete some excluded files in rsync > > Hello > > I suggest that a feature be added into rsync. That one could > separately > specify excluded files that should be deleted on the receiver and > excluded files

Just as background information: our spam filter caught 14000 attempted spams in the last two weeks. Suggestions on blocking more are welcome but the vast majority is already blocked. I think we removed the @samba.org whitelist. -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc:

> > > > > > > I guess I could write an initial protocol specification - but it would > > > not be complete and I wouldn't be able to relicense my library to > > > LGPL anyway. > > > > > > So I guess I have convinced myself that it is not worth the effort > > > trying. Time is probably better spent coding ;) And that's OK

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, rsync2eran@tromer.org wrote: > A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and > librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision > attacks are known on MD4. Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost? -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

On 5 Jan 2005, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 18:24 +0100, Robert Lemmen wrote: > > hi rusty, > > > > i read on some webpage about rsync and debian that you wrote a patch to > > rsync that let's it uses heuristics when deciding which local file to > > use. could you tell me whether this is planned to be included in