search for: sourabh

...="clang;lld;lldb;mlir" -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER:STRING=lld and also by adding -DLLVM_ALL_PROJECTS. It's giving this compilation error -- Building CXX object tools/mlir/lib/Analysis/CMakeFiles/obj.MLIRAnalysis.dir/AffineAnalysis.cpp.o In file included from /home/sourabh/mirror-upstream/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/AffineOps/AffineOps.h:22:0, from /home/sourabh/mirror-upstream/mlir/lib/Analysis/AffineAnalysis.cpp:17: /home/sourabh/mirror-upstream/mlir/include/mlir/Transforms/LoopLikeInterface.h:22:10: fatal error: mlir/Transforms/LoopLikeInterface.h.i...

...ponding IncGen targets. This seems broken in the short term and unmaintainable in the long term. There really needs to be a way of automatically generating the right dependencies. Steve On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 9:13 AM Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Sourabh, > > This usually indicates a missing dependency in our CMakeLists.txt, if > you restart the build a couple of times it will likely succeed. > > I will try to fix this missing dependency today. > > -- > Mehdi > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 1:37 AM Sourabh Singh Tomar...

Hi Tom, I do not have SVN account, for accessing LLVM. Thanks, Sourabh On Tue 29 Oct, 2019, 9:08 AM Tom Stellard, <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/26/2019 03:39 AM, Sourabh Singh Tomar wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I recently requested Chris regarding commit access to LLVM. > > He asked me to wait till the GitHub migration compl...

..., DW_TAG_call_site_paramter .. only DW_AT_GNU_all_call_sites attribute is present. + @Djorde DW_TAG_call_site are supported using late MIR approach, are the new Call Site related development will be supported via MIR. or their will be a frontend level debug metadata support will be added. Thanks! Sourabh. On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:02 PM Djordje Todorovic < djordje.todorovic at rt-rk.com> wrote: > Great to see this! :) > > Best, > Djordje > > On 10.9.19. 21:16, Vedant Kumar wrote: > > > > > >> On Sep 10, 2019, at 6:15 AM, Djordje Todorovic via llvm-d...

> On Sep 10, 2019, at 6:15 AM, Djordje Todorovic via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Sourabh, > > Support for call-site related DWARF 5 tag/attributes is implemented very late, in the LLVM middle-end. > Please note that there is also the IR-level flag (DIFlagAllCallsDescribed) that lowers to > the DW_AT_call_all_calls. > > There is also support for call-site-parameter (...

...ebuggability of clang generated binaries with GDB. Primary motivation being GDB better handling of gcc generated binaries, compared to clang. We've been also tracking Ali's patches in gdb mailing list. Jini can update you better on, this one. Will ask her share update on this one. Thanks, Sourabh On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:59 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > +some other debugger people (Pavel - wasn't sure which email address you > prefer, feel free to let me know (privately or publicly) for future > reference) > > I work at Google & we'r...

...opments happening WRT DWARF-5. As of now, we're working on -- PR 43263, 43622 -- reported today {Just Now} we'll be up-streaming patches for these. Please let us know your thoughts, and anything else that's relevant that we need to aware of before picking up. Thanks in anticipation! Sourabh Singh Tomar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191009/338689c8/attachment.html>

...de support in clang and llvm. Noticed that, DW_TAG_call_site is supported in llvm middle-end. but clang is not emitting these. I was hoping, if someone could provide current status of these features and current status of dwarf-5 features in clang and llvm. That will be immensely helpful. Thanks! Sourabh. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190910/0c0a9e3f/attachment.html>

...O3 -enable-partial-inlining" pass which is doing some DebugInfo manipulation, later triggering this. Reproducibility: $ wget https://download.open-mpi.org/release/open-mpi/v4.0/openmpi-4.0.0.tar.bz2 $ tar -xf openmpi-4.0.0 $ cd openmpi-4.0.0 $ ./configure --enable-mpi-fortran=no OMPI_CC=/home/sourabh/mirror-upstream/build/release/bin/clang OMPI_CXX=clang++ CXX=clang++ CC=clang CFLAGS="="-g -O3 -mllvm -enable-partial-inlining " CXXFLAGS="-g -O3 -mllvm -enable-partial-inlining" AR=llvm-ar RANLIB=llvm-ranlib NM=llvm-nm $ make -jN ----CRASH---- Details of Narrowing: $ cd o...

> On Apr 1, 2020, at 2:56 AM, Sourabh Singh Tomar <sourav0311 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Do you mean documenting the desired frontend behavior, or adding some verifier in > LLVM? A warning for the latter is that SROA may currently emit IR that contains a > mix of declares and values for different fragments of an...

Try using $PWD/test.cpp on the clang command line. I am seeing the duplicate DIFile entries, but not yet able to reproduce a .debug_line section with multiple directory entries. --paulr From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Tomar, Sourabh Singh via llvm-dev Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 1:07 PM To: Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalappa0 at gmail.com>; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org Developers <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Filename's in DIBuileder [AMD Official Use Only - In...

...g above test case with following commandline: $clang -g -O3 -mllvm –enable-partial-inlining creducegenerated-cleaned.c -c ---CRASH--- $clang -g -O3 creducegenerated-cleaned.c -c Working fine. Or you may also try as: $opt -partial-inliner creduce-O3.ll -S | llc >/dev/null ---CRASH--- Thank You, Sourabh. From: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 6:18 AM To: Tomar, Sourabh Singh <SourabhSingh.Tomar at amd.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Vedant <vsk at apple.com> Subject: Re: [DebugInfo]Crash during building openmpi4.0.0 [CAUTION: External Em...

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 4:13 AM, Jeremy Morse via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Sourabh, > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM Sourabh Singh Tomar via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Under what circumstances should a frontend choose to emit(at -O0(No optimization)) llvm.dbg.value for a local variable. >> >> I saw some debuginfo code i...

...tadata !9, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !11 *Please note here, that IR snippet is generated by flang(at -O0), so no clang/llvm intervention happening till this point. After this llvm takes over this IR for final target code generation. Can anybody provide some clarity WRT this. Thanks a lot! Sourabh Singh Tomar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200330/ca1f7e1a/attachment-0001.html>

Hi Sourabh, Thanks for raising this issue. To answer your question, (afaik) there isn’t anyone working on DW_AT_start_scope support in tree. We’re looking for a solution to this problem for Swift debugging, where it's important not to make a debug location for a variable available until its (guaranteed)...

...-std=c++03 in Frontend or let it remain alias of c++98. LLVM AsmPrinters has already code for supporting these new DWARF-5 Language Tags. So, If we decide not to go with DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03, we'll have to remove it's reference from llvm, since frontend won't emit it at all. Thanks! Sourabh Singh Tomar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190913/dc5f7ab9/attachment-0001.html>

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 11:57 PM, Sourabh Singh Tomar <sourav0311 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > My understanding is that this isn't correct: dbg.declare specifies the >> memory address of a variable for the whole lifetime of the function, >> whereas dbg.value (and dbg.addr) specify the value/address until t...

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 1:18 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > Ah, thanks for the list - mostly I'm interested in cases where Clang's > > output is not valid DWARFv5 when requested - the new features DWARFv5 > > enables/allows but doesn't require are lower priority to me. Which I > > don't think too much is left - DWARFv5

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:59 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Welcome Sourabh, > > > > There are many bits of DWARF-5 that haven’t been implemented. > Got a short list, by chance? > I know there is currently no big push within Sony to “fill in the > corners” for v5, as we have been more focused on quality of debug info for > optimized code (not l...

Hi All, I recently requested Chris regarding commit access to LLVM. He asked me to wait till the GitHub migration completes and then ask in llvm-dev to get access to GitHub. Please, let me know what are the next step or pre-requisites, in process. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: