search for: sothing

On 07/04/15 13:04, Rowland Penny wrote: > Hi, never used freebsd, but 4.2 is not just an AD DC, it is also > supposed to be a replacement for the old 3.6 series and work in the same > way. That's what I'm trying to achieve. > There are some changes to what can and cannot go into smb.conf, but > these are minor and can easily be identified by reading the smb.conf >

Hi, I've got a brand new Asterisk 11 setup for which I would like to keep the number of loaded modules to a minimum. My goal is to this setup in a pure SIP environment, for switching incoming calls to outgoing tSIP trunks. When I leave autoload=yes in /etc/asterisk/modules.conf, I can handle an incoming SIP call with a Playback app. When I leave autoload=no in /etc/asterisk/modules.conf, it

On 05/07/15 14:59, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 07/04/15 13:04, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> Hi, never used freebsd, but 4.2 is not just an AD DC, it is also >> supposed to be a replacement for the old 3.6 series and work in the same >> way. > > That's what I'm trying to achieve. > > > >> There are some changes to what can and cannot go into

Hello. I know this is half OS-specific: I already asked on freebsd-ports@, but got no answer so far... Since 3.6 has been EOLed I'd like to upgrade all my such Samba installations to 4.2. Right now I don't want to switch any of them to AD; I just want to keep running as I do now, but with a supported version. I've started from the simplest cases and so far I've been able to

...to join this server" What does it mean computer account global or local i don't understand if the probleme is on my W2000 machine or in my configuration of samba. I know that if i give a bad password the message is different so i think W2000 and samba good communicate If someone have an sothing Thank -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Sorry for the previous HTML message. This time in plain text. sscanf can take an integer which specifies the maximum field width. In this test, the field width is 1 and the input is a negative number sothe test fails. This patch increases the maximum field width to 2. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano at gentoo.org> --- usr/klibc/tests/sscanf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

I would really appreciate it if someone can give suggestions on how to do spectra fitting in R using ordinary least square fitting and non-negativity constraints. The lm() function works well for ordinary least square fitting, but how to specify non-negativity constraints? It wouldn't make sense if the fitting coefficients coming out as negative in absorption spectra deconvolution. Thanks.

We haven''t been able to use mongrel for testing yet, but in order not to waste time, we did some performance testing with 1, 2 and 4 puppetmasterd/webrick processes. Attached is an HTML page (ripped from our wiki - not pretty, but reasonably readable) which describes the method and results. If someone feels like making some nice graphs, that would be great. If not, I''ll try to