search for: sorts

Dear List, Is there a way I can sort a sample based on a sort index constructed from the data from which the sample is taken? Basically, I need to take 'many' samples from the same source data and sort them. This can be very time consuming for long vectors. Is there any way I can sort the data only once initially, and use that sort order for the samples? I believe that idea is what is

I''m trying to sort my search results by Date, in descending order. I''ve done quite a bit of reading through the forums here, and I''ve tried two different suggestions. This just returns results in the same order as a search without a sort: sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("ferret_created_at",:reverse => :true)

Is there a R function for sort a data frame by a variable ? I know sort a vector, but I don't know sort a data frame by a column. Can you help me ? the sort() function don't work with data frame.

Hi I think this is a very easy question but here goes: I want to sort my results by a boolean field and then by score, I thought this would be a default configuration but apparently not. sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new(:sponsored, :reverse => :true) that is my current code, how do iu alter it so that the results are then sorted by highest score first?

Hello, I wonder if I ran into a bug. If I do summary(df1$X1) -> df1.y df1.y a b c d e [1,] 50.74627 8.955224 17.91045 19.40299 2.985075 sort(df1.y) a b c d e [1,] 2.985075 8.955224 17.91045 19.40299 50.74627 my numbers are sorted but do not anymore correspond to the rownames. For me it is counterintuitive that solely the numbers are sorted and not the names. Is

Hi, while backtracking why sort(NULL) gives a warning, and acknowledging that NULL is not the same as an empty vector and sort(NULL) is bad coding, I discovered the following inconsistency of sort.int(): > x <- NULL > sort(x) Warning in is.na(x) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector) of type 'NULL' NULL > sort.int(x) Warning in is.na(x) : is.na() applied to non-(list

...rFuncs = [ String, Number, function(str) { var dateSplit = str.split(/\D/); //assume we''re in MM/DD/YYYY format return (dateSplit[2] * 10000) + (dateSplit[0] * 100) + (str[1] * 1); } ]; </script> ---------------------- That''s it. Our table now correctly sorts by clicking on the table headers. If you want, add "multisort" to the table''s class, and you get the equivalent of multiple "ORDER BY" arguments to an SQL statement. Is there interest around in a library like this? -Felipe Gasper Cincinnati, OH -- Felipe M. L. Gaspe...

I''m having problems sorting on untokenized fields. I have one field that sorts fine, but there are others that seem to sort on a different field. Here''s the index description: acts_as_ferret :remote=>true,:fields=>{:name=>{:boost=>2},:name_for_sort=>{:index => :untokenized}, :city=>{:boost=>2}, :city_for_sort=>{:index=>:untokeniz...

------------------ >>>>> Henric Winell <[hidden email]> >>>>> on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:43:02 +0200 writes: > Den 2015-10-21 kl. 07:24, skrev Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel: >> Marius Hofert-4------------------------------ >>> Den 2015-10-09 kl. 12:14, skrev Martin Maechler: >>> I think so: the code above

Hi, Consider the following example: sort(10:1, partial=3) ## 1 2 3 7 6 5 4 8 9 10 sort(10:1, index=T) ## $x: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ## $ix: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 sort(10:1, partial=3, index=T) ## 1 2 3 7 6 5 4 8 9 10 The first 2 calls gave expected returns; however, the third one did not returned an index as requested. I could not find anything about it in

As Jim has indicated, memory usage problems can require very specific diagnostics and code changes, so generic help is tough to give. However, in most cases I have found the dplyr package to be more memory efficient than plyr, so you could consider that. Also, you can be explicit about only saving the minimum results you want to keep rather than making a list of complete results and extracting

Hello All, I am having an issue with AAF and sorting results of a search. Right now, I have results being split onto pages of 10. The results are being sorted alphabetically, but not across multiple pages - it''s just sorting the 10 it pulls down on each page. I noticed another post from April regarding this same issue (http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/62993#66934) where the issue was

I was looking at rank() and I came across: ... "first" = sort.list(sort.list(xx)), ... line 32 of rank.r [1] sort.list(x) returns the indices of the values of x in ascending (by default) order. So sort.list(sort.list(x)) returns the same list. So, what am I missing here? -Tyler [1] view-source:http://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/base/R/rank.R [[alternative HTML version

...x$Species) ##subsetting alone works fine with(x, x[Sepal.Length==6.7,]) ##sorting alone works fine with(x, x[order(Sepal.Length, rev(sort(Species1))),]) ##gets subsetted, but not sorted as expected with(x, x[(Sepal.Length==6.7) & order(Sepal.Length, rev(sort(Species1))),]) ##gets subsetted, but sorts very strangely xa <- with(x, x[Sepal.Length==6.7,]); with(xa, xa[order(Sepal.Length, rev(sort(Species1))),]) xa <- with(x, x[Sepal.Length==6.7,]); with(xa, xa[order(rev(sort(Species1))),]) I've checked The R Inferno, Quick-R and several other places with no obvious solution. Any ideas?...

Hi all, I'm modeling using lme in the nlme package. qqnorm makes plots just find, but when I try to add a line with qqline, I get the following error: "Error in sort.list(x, partial = unique(c(lo, hi))) : 'x' must be atomic for 'sort.list' Have you called 'sort' on a list?" For example > modelincr10<-lme(lruin~can.pos.num, data=rwushi30, random=(~1|

Result of uid sort by subject is not expected. for example: Japanese => English => Japanese => English I'm now using Dovecot 2.2.31. command example: HNKK6 UID SORT (REVERSE SUBJECT) utf-7 ALL * SORT 3 1 7 2 4 10 11 8 12 HNKK6 OK Sort completed (0.002 + 0.041 + 0.001 secs). Any hint? -- Masashi Astro TACHIBANA QUALITIA CO., LTD. mailto:tachibana at qualitia.co.jp

Oh, this seemed so simple (and I'm sure the answer will be, as usual, so thanks in advance for enlightening me). I need to sort each row of a matrix independent of the others. For example, > test <- matrix(c(8,7,1,2,6,5,9,4,3),nrow=3) > test [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 8 2 9 [2,] 7 6 4 [3,] 1 5 3 I can get each row sorted well enough. > sort(test[1,]) [1]

Hi, I'm trying to translate some Matlab code to R and I'm trying to implement the behavior of Matlab's sort() which when applied to a matrix will sort the columns returning the column sorted matrix as well as a matrix of permuted indices. Doing: > x <- matrix(c(3,4,2,6,3,4,8,7,5), nr=3) > x [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 3 6 8 [2,] 4 3 7 [3,] 2 4 5

I am trying to sort a list and the data is obiously not in the right format. I am trying: x <- list() x[["A"]] <- 1 x[["B"]] <- 2 order(x) But am getting: Error in order(x) : unimplemented type 'list' in 'orderVector1' How should I change the list so that it can be sorted? What kinds of objects (classes of objects) can be sorted? Thank you. Kevin

Hello, I am apparently confused about the use of an id parameter for an event history/survival model, and why the EHA documentation for aftreg does not specify one. All assistance and insights are appreciated. Attempting to specifiy an id variable with the documentation example generates an "overlapping intervals" error, so I sorted the original mort dataframe and set subsequent entry