search for: sort_field

...const char *title; + const char *version; + char *version0; /* version string padded with zeros */ + const char *machine_id; + const char *linux_; + const char *initrd; + const char *efi; + char *options; + const char *devicetree; + const char *architecture; + char *sort_field; /* used internally for sorting */ + const char *filename; +}; + +static void clear_bls_data(struct blsdata *bd) +{ + refstr_put(bd->title); + refstr_put(bd->version); + free(bd->version0); + refstr_put(bd->machine_id); + refstr_put(bd->linux_); + refstr_put(bd-&...

...cation. > > Any reason why you don't try to implement this in syslinux core? > > <snip> > > > +static int parse_bls1_file(struct blsdata *bd, const char *filename) > > +{ > > + FILE *f = NULL; > > + char line[MAX_LINE], *p; > > + char *sort_field; > > + > > + dprintf("Opening bls entry: %s ", filename); > > + > > + f = fopen(filename, "r"); > > + dprintf("%s\n", f ? "ok" : "failed"); > > + > > + if (!f) > > + return -1; >...

...files that are defined by > this new specification. Any reason why you don't try to implement this in syslinux core? <snip> > +static int parse_bls1_file(struct blsdata *bd, const char *filename) > +{ > + FILE *f = NULL; > + char line[MAX_LINE], *p; > + char *sort_field; > + > + dprintf("Opening bls entry: %s ", filename); > + > + f = fopen(filename, "r"); > + dprintf("%s\n", f ? "ok" : "failed"); > + > + if (!f) > + return -1; > + > + refstr_put(bd->filename);...

The document describes search(query, options) sort: An array of SortFields describing how to sort the results. I have created index with two fields: ''file'' and ''content'' When I give SortField name as ''file'' while searching, it results into error. The exact command given by me: index.search_each("sleepless AND dreams", :num_docs

..."pxelinux.pathprefix" for pxelinux. > > > > <snip> > > > > > +static int parse_bls1_file(struct blsdata *bd, const char > > > *filename) +{ > > > + FILE *f = NULL; > > > + char line[MAX_LINE], *p; > > > + char *sort_field; > > > + > > > + dprintf("Opening bls entry: %s ", filename); > > > + > > > + f = fopen(filename, "r"); > > > + dprintf("%s\n", f ? "ok" : "failed"); > > > + > > > + if (!f)...

I am getting strange results when I reverse sort a query. I am sorting by date, but it doesn''t seem to be related to dates (I have tried just integers). I also paginate the results. Items in the result set are sometimes duplicated and the not ordered at all. When I try a non-reverse sort I don''t see duplicates and the ordering is correct. Any ideas what is going on? Thanks

...is not managing to sort the booleans. I tried declaring this in my model but it seems to have had no effect. def false.<=>(o) o ? -1 : 0 end def true.<=>(o) !o ? 1 : 0 end I''m using the acts_as_ferret plugin. below is the relevent code that i''m currently using. sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("sponsorerd") sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("ferret_date_registered", :reverse => :true) results = VoObject.find_by_contents(query,:first_doc=>page, :num_docs=> 20,:sort =>sort_fields)...

I''m trying to sort my search results by Date, in descending order. I''ve done quite a bit of reading through the forums here, and I''ve tried two different suggestions. This just returns results in the same order as a search without a sort: sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("ferret_created_at",:reverse => :true) Comment.find_by_contents("test", :sort => sort_fields, :num_docs => 5) This also doesn''t affect the order: Comment.find_by_contents("test", :sort => [...

Hi I think this is a very easy question but here goes: I want to sort my results by a boolean field and then by score, I thought this would be a default configuration but apparently not. sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new(:sponsored, :reverse => :true) that is my current code, how do iu alter it so that the results are then sorted by highest score first? thanks very much. regards caspar -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...ield called date_registered and have this working with pagination. here is what i''m doing at the moment: ################################ acts_as_ferret :fields=> [''short_description'',...,''date_registered''] def VoObject.find_results(query,page) sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("date_registered", :reverse => :false) results2 = VoObject.find_by_contents(query,:num_docs=> 2000000,:sort =>sort_fields ) num = results2.size if page == 1 page = 0 else page = (page-1)*20 end results...

Hi there, I''m having some strange sorting stuff goign on. Here''s my search method: sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("name", :reverse => :false) @results = Listing.find_by_contents @search_criteria, :limit => :all, :sort => sort_fields page = (params[:page] ||= 1).to_i items_per_page = 9 offset = (page - 1) * items_per_page @pa...

..._put(bd->version0); + refstr_put(bd->machine_id); + refstr_put(bd->freax); + free(bd->initrd); + refstr_put(bd->efi); + free(bd->options); + refstr_put(bd->devicetree); + refstr_put(bd->architecture); + refstr_put(bd->other); + refstr_put(bd->sort_field); + + memset(bd, 0, sizeof *bd); +} + +/* + * inspired by syslinux/com32/modules/ls.c:compare_dirent + */ +int compare_bls_data(const void *p_bd1, const void *p_bd2) +{ + if (!p_bd1 || !p_bd2) + return 0; + + const struct blsdata *bd1 = *(const struct blsdata **)p_bd1; + const struct bl...

Hey guys, im trying to get my friends to come up at the top of the act as ferret search. I would query the whole result set first, then move my friends to the top, but the thing is, Im paginating my results and use the offset and limit parameters in the multi_search() function. Anyone know how to do this? Thanks in advance... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have the acts_as_ferret plugin installed. Everything searches great, but I would like to limit the results (i.e. by ''end_date'') and sort them (by ''end_date''). ''end_date'' is a valid column in my "posts" table. Here''s the code I have already: @posts = Post.find_by_contents(params[:query]) params[:query] comes from a form. I

The acts_as_ferret documentation says find_by_content returns an instance of SearchResults, but I see this error when I try to use the results. undefined method `total_hits'' for []:Array Here is the link to the documentation: http://projects.jkraemer.net/acts_as_ferret/rdoc/classes/FerretMixin/Acts/ARFerret/ClassMethods.html#M000010 But here is the actual code: result =

...ensetech.org''] cfg.index.path = ''/my/path/to/index'' cfg.verbose = true ...I get this output: $ rdig -c config/rdig_config.rb /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/ferret/index/term.rb:45: warning: method redefined; discarding old text= /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/ferret/search/sort_field.rb:69: warning: instance variable @name not initialized /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/ferret/search/sort_field.rb:69: warning: instance variable @name not initialized lib/ferret/query_parser/query_parser.y:128: warning: method redefined; discarding old initialize lib/ferret/query_parser/query_par...

Hello All, I am having an issue with AAF and sorting results of a search. Right now, I have results being split onto pages of 10. The results are being sorted alphabetically, but not across multiple pages - it''s just sorting the 10 it pulls down on each page. I noticed another post from April regarding this same issue (http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/62993#66934) where the issue was

I''m having problems sorting on untokenized fields. I have one field that sorts fine, but there are others that seem to sort on a different field. Here''s the index description: acts_as_ferret :remote=>true,:fields=>{:name=>{:boost=>2},:name_for_sort=>{:index => :untokenized}, :city=>{:boost=>2}, :city_for_sort=>{:index=>:untokenized},

I had sort-by-date working almost perfectly with my app. It was behaving as expected for most data, but had a few hiccups with certain data. I investigated and discovered that the correct data was storing this in my ferret index: "1999-10-18 00:00:00" and the incorrect data was storing this: "Mon Oct 18 00:00:00 EDT 1999" (oops...) So I of course had to fix the

Ferret 0.10.11 & AAF: the time seems to be stored in a format that can''t be sorted, the order doesn''t make any sense. Workaround: use to_i on the Time object before putting it into the index. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.