search for: soot

...programs that use System.Out, for example. Alkis is definitely the > person to talk to if you're interested in it. Thanks.. I'm actually more interested in what would be involved to hook up LLVM to an existing JVM. In particular JCVM (http://jcvm.sf.net). JCVM analyzes bytecode using Soot, emits C code, compiles that with GCC, and then loads executable code from the resulting ELF files.. given this design, using LLVM/modules instead of Soot/GCC/ELF would not be very much different, but would allow more cool things to happen. The main barrier to this idea for me are (besides the usu...

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: >> Has it been hooked up to a JVM? If so, how and which ones? > > I think the point of llvm-java was to avoid a JVM. That is, it converts llvm-java is the JVM. > either Java source or Java bytecode into equivalent LLVM bytecode. I llvm-java only supports input from Java bytecode. > think the big thing lacking so far are the Java

...for example. Alkis is >> definitely the person to talk to if you're interested in it. > > Thanks.. I'm actually more interested in what would be involved to > hook up LLVM to an existing JVM. In particular JCVM (http:// > jcvm.sf.net). > JCVM analyzes bytecode using Soot, emits C code, compiles that with > GCC, > and then loads executable code from the resulting ELF files.. given > this > design, using LLVM/modules instead of Soot/GCC/ELF would not be > very much > different, but would allow more cool things to happen. If you're only in...

...not contributed to the LLVM community yet. I am very excited to contribute to LLVM! I am not too familiar with the inter-procedural analysis infrastructure of LLVM. I have written small toy inter-procedural dataflow analysis (like taint analysis, reaching definitions, etc) for JAVA programs using SOOT tool *[5].* I am familiar with the theory of inter-procedural analysis (I’ve read some chapters of [1], [2] and [3] for this). I am trying to understand the LLVM’s Attributor framework. I am interested in these 3 aspects: 1. How Attributor can help for standard inter-procedural and in...

...Java exceptions (assuming you care about that). LLVM Vikram> does not preserve the order of potentially excepting instructions Vikram> (e.g., a divide or a load). This would have to be handled Vikram> explicitly, whether you use llvm-java or simply used LLVM on the C Vikram> code from Soot. I don't know if/how libgcj handles this but Tom may Vikram> be able to say more about that. libgcj has two different approaches. On some platforms we generate explicit checks for null pointer dereferences and for division by zero (division is a bit different in that we also have to handl...

...>> I am very excited to contribute to LLVM! >> >> I am not too familiar with the inter-procedural analysis infrastructure >> of LLVM. I have written small toy inter-procedural dataflow analysis (like >> taint analysis, reaching definitions, etc) for JAVA programs using SOOT >> tool *[5].* I am familiar with the theory of inter-procedural analysis >> (I’ve read some chapters of [1], [2] and [3] for this). >> >> I am trying to understand the LLVM’s Attributor framework. I am >> interested in these 3 aspects: >> >> 1. >&g...

...esponse. Sequence number 0 is not positive. but it works fine in case of: mx2# opiekey -n5 1 vo6199 Using the MD5 algorithm to compute response. Reminder: Don't use opiekey from telnet or dial-in sessions. Enter secret pass phrase: 0: OAK SEW CULT FALL AX WAND 1: BOUT AID SOOT BUT SIT BILK mx2# *** 3 *** pam_opie.so, the most interesting thing After successful login with 0 sequence number, trying to do it again (sequence number has been decreased, right?) mx2# ssh ssa@192.168.90.250 otp-md5 -1 (null) ext Password: Is it impossible to calculate response...

...ntribute to LLVM! >>>> >>>> I am not too familiar with the inter-procedural analysis infrastructure >>>> of LLVM. I have written small toy inter-procedural dataflow analysis (like >>>> taint analysis, reaching definitions, etc) for JAVA programs using SOOT >>>> tool *[5].* I am familiar with the theory of inter-procedural analysis >>>> (I’ve read some chapters of [1], [2] and [3] for this). >>>> >>>> I am trying to understand the LLVM’s Attributor framework. I am >>>> interested in these 3...

...the > behavior of Java exceptions (assuming you care about that). LLVM does > not preserve the order of potentially excepting instructions (e.g., a > divide or a load). This would have to be handled explicitly, whether > you use llvm-java or simply used LLVM on the C code from Soot. I don't > know if/how libgcj handles this but Tom may be able to say more about > that. Right.. I think we'd have to revert to signal-less exception checking for null pointer and divide-by-zero for the time being. But this brings up a good point.. should LLVM have an "inst...

...> that). LLVM > Vikram> does not preserve the order of potentially excepting > instructions > Vikram> (e.g., a divide or a load). This would have to be handled > Vikram> explicitly, whether you use llvm-java or simply used LLVM > on the C > Vikram> code from Soot. I don't know if/how libgcj handles this > but Tom may > Vikram> be able to say more about that. > > libgcj has two different approaches. > > On some platforms we generate explicit checks for null pointer > dereferences and for division by zero (division is a bit diff...

I'm just wondering if anyone knows the story with these... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=5721202362&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT He claims they support IAX2 and SIP... but almost no history on the account selling them. I didn't see anything in the wiki about this company either.. Does anyone have any history with these phones? Thanks, Jared