search for: somevalues

I hope you can help me with this In a controller I make a call to session[:user_id] in order to retrieve the value that has previously been assigned to the session object by a login method. The result is the error "Symbol as array index", so rails for some reason just thinks session is any other array. I have tried prefixing the call with @request so that it goes: somevariable =

I'm trying to set a channel variable and make it available to another channel: I thought that if I SetVar(_SomeVariable=SomeValue) or SetVar(__SomeVariable=SomeValue) then SomeVariable would be available in the destination channel. However __SomeVariable, _SomeVariable and SomeVariable are all blank. The scenario: Agents logon to the queue using callbacklogin. From what I can gather

...i]/2.0))/2.0; } for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) { sum += (par[i]*log(lambda[i]) + (1-par[i]*log(1-lambda[i]))); } return sum; } void optimgr(int n, double *par, double *gr, void *ex) { for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) { gr[i] = log(par[i]) - log(1-par[i]); } } void Test(SEXP SomeValues) { PROTECT(SomeValues = AS_NUMERIC(SomeValues)); double * CValues = NUMERIC_POINTER(SomeValues); void * optEx, *grEx, *overallEx; int mask = -1, fncount, grcount, failed; double *Fmax, *gradients; int size = sizeof(CValues)/sizeof(double);...

I have an S3 class called "tis" (Time Indexed Series) which may or may not have multiple columns. I have a function "[<-.tis" that I've reproduced below. My question is this: inside of "[<-.tis", how can I distinguish between calls of the form x[i] <- someValue and x[i,] <- someValue ? In either case, nargs() is 3, and looking at the values

I have an S3 class called "tis" (Time Indexed Series) which may or may not have multiple columns. I have a function "[<-.tis" that I've reproduced below. My question is this: inside of "[<-.tis", how can I distinguish between calls of the form x[i] <- someValue and x[i,] <- someValue ? In either case, nargs() is 3, and looking at the values

On 08/06/18 19:38, Phil Perry wrote: > On 08/06/18 15:54, lejeczek wrote: >> hi >> >> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg >> >> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' >> >> I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is >> fricking working.. >> I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor

> What do you mean exactly by "behave differently on the other side of the cast”? Do you have a concrete example? I was hesitant to say only in that it is probably an "abuse of mechanics" and definitely playing with fire, _however_ the target I'm working on has extensive bit operations for a subset of memory, including atomic test-and-set, etc. It's convenient to be

Hi, According to https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables you could use conditionals to assign values to a varible. The syntax is: %{if;value1;operator;value2;value-if-true;value-if-false} where any of the fields can refer to another field using %v or %{value} syntax. The problem is that when I use a config like: user_attrs = ...,=relpath=%{if;%u;eq;somevalue;valuetrue;valuefalse} it works

Ok... I am reluctant to ask this question as I believe that it may be like asking what someones favorite linux distribution is... but I need to make an informed decision. We are getting ready to upgrade from a TE210P to a quad T1 card with echo cancellation. I am trying to decide between the Sangoma card and the Digium card. I need this to have great quality and I need it to work well. I would

hi how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\' I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working.. I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor failure) so if you try just the command line do not believe it, because later as it executes %if you will see process does not see these definitions. many

Greetings all- I have some dialplan code on an Asterisk 1.2.x box that basically dials a call, then after call completion, runs a command via System(). However, I'm finding that roughly 5% of the time, the System() command never executes and seems to be on specific destinations. Simplified/paraphrased example: exten => 1,1,Set(VARIABLE=SOMEVALUE) exten =>

Hi, I have the following observe field: <%= observe_field :session_treatment, :url => { :action => ''retrieve_rate'' }, :with => ''treatment'' %> This passes on the ''treatment'' variable to the action, but I''d like to pass another variable and I''m having a hard time figuring out how to write it. Any help would be

Hi *, in the process of improving the ios experience with ghc, I ran into the following issue: the produced llvm code[1] compiles for `armv7-apple-darwin`, unless optimization level is 0, however it fails to compile at all for `armv7-apple-ios`. I was able to reduce the produced code, while retaining the compilation issue on `armv7-apple-ios` to the following sample case: —————————————————————

Hi, How does the requirement that phi instructions have one value per predecessor basic block interact with indirectbr instructions? For instance, take the following code: L1: br i1 %somevalue, label %L2, label %L3 L2: %ret1 = i8* blockaddress(@myfunction, %L5) br label %L4 L3: %ret2 = i8* blockaddress(@myfunction, %L6) br label %L4 L4: %ret = phi i8* [%ret1, L2], [%ret2, L3]

I'm trying to insert rows of a data.frame into a database table, or update where the key fields of a record already exist in the table. I've come up with a possible solution below, but would like to hear if anyone has a better solution. # The problem demonstrated: # Create a data.frame with test values library(RODBC) tbl <- data.frame( key1 = rep(1:3, each = 2), key2 =

Hello! I'm trying LLVM for generating code and I found something I cannot figure out or find in the documentation: I'm doing something like this to call "sin" from std: std::vector<const Type*> params; params.push_back( Type::FloatTy ); FunctionType *FT = FunctionType::get( Type::FloatTy, params, false); Function *F = new Function( FT, Function::ExternalLinkage,

Hi This may be a dumb question with an obvious answer. It would seem that an input form field identified with an ''id'' qualifier and not with a ''name'' qualifier is not recognised by Mechanize - at least it isn''t in the form field list. Is there any way of getting at these elements or am I, as I suspect, fresh out of luck. But you never know ...

The following caught me off-guard: R> z <- 1i + 1:10 R> z <- Re(z) R> z [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 as expected. But look: R> z <- 1i + 1:10 R> make.real <- abs(z) < 1000 R> z[make.real] <- Re(z[make.real]) R> z [1] 1+0i 2+0i 3+0i 4+0i 5+0i 6+0i 7+0i 8+0i 9+0i 10+0i R> didn't make z a real vector, which is what I wanted.

Evan Cheng wrote: > While I agree spill cost computation does not belong in coalescer, I > am not sure if it should go into a separate pass. To me, spill cost > formulas should be register allocator specific. Perhaps it ought to > belong to a generic register allocator class. Each derivative > allocator is responsible for overriding it and calling it if it deems >

The following combine(-enabling transformation) makes me uncomfortable:   gep(addrspacecast(gep p0) to p1)   addrspacecast(gep(gep p0)) to p1 It's applied at visitAddrSpaceCast in InstCombineCasts.cpp. Before this, I'd always assumed address spaces were very much "user domain". Datalayout even supports marking a space as "non-integral", to designate that manipulation as