Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "somethingelseyoucareabout".
2005 Sep 22
0
[LLVMdev] name collision - llvm::tie and boost::tie
...e them.
That should be fine if they are in a namespace boost {}.
> I hope I could "using namespace" boost and llvm in .cpp file, because
> it's tedious to use fully-qualified identifiers in boost and llvm
> namespace.
Add:
using boost::somethingyoucareabout;
using boost::somethingelseyoucareabout;
using namespace llvm;
Or whatever you prefer. This way you only import the symbols you want.
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
2005 Sep 22
3
[LLVMdev] name collision - llvm::tie and boost::tie
On 22/09/05, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't you state the explicit namespaces. So not using "using
> namespace llvm" and instead prefix all calls with "llvm::"?
The header files in boost do not use fully-qualified tie(). I probably
should not modify them. But my .cpp file #include them.
I hope I could "using namespace" boost
2005 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] name collision - llvm::tie and boost::tie
...n a namespace boost {}.
>
> > I hope I could "using namespace" boost and llvm in .cpp file, because
> > it's tedious to use fully-qualified identifiers in boost and llvm
> > namespace.
>
> Add:
>
> using boost::somethingyoucareabout;
> using boost::somethingelseyoucareabout;
> using namespace llvm;
>
> Or whatever you prefer. This way you only import the symbols you want.
In fact, I believe that
using namespace llvm;
using namespace boost;
using boost::tie;
should resove the problem witout needed to explicitly nominate all boost names
you use. E...