search for: somestuff

Dear R users, How to change lattice panel label/text from the automatically generated label (based on the conditioning) to our own set of label? for example: someStuff <- data.frame(area = rep(c("SOUTH", "NORTH", "EAST", "WEST"), each = 25), group = rep(c("A","B","C","D"), each = 5), mytime = rep(1:4), val1 = sample(1:100, size=100, r...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274 Summary: scp fails if target account has echo "somestuff" as last line in .profile Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: openssh-unix...

Hello, I am copying /mnt/foo to /mnt/bar/ rsync --info=name1,del2 -rl /mnt/foo /mnt/bar/ /mnt/foo contains deep directory structure, ie: /mnt/foo/aaa/ /mnt/foo/aaa/somestuff/ /mnt/foo/aaa/somestuff/file1 /mnt/foo/bbb/ /mnt/foo/bbb/someotherstuff/ /mnt/foo/bbb/someotherstuff/file2 I am not interested in details which individual files were copied, just the main directory. Is it somehow possible for rsync to only report the first level directory? ie, to hav...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-06-13 04:21 ------- so your .profile is broken. you're not supposed to do this for non-interactive session. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-07-18

Fourhundred Thecat via rsync <400thecat at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am copying /mnt/foo to /mnt/bar/ > > rsync --info=name1,del2 -rl /mnt/foo /mnt/bar/ > > /mnt/foo contains deep directory structure, ie: > > /mnt/foo/aaa/ > /mnt/foo/aaa/somestuff/ > /mnt/foo/aaa/somestuff/file1 > > /mnt/foo/bbb/ > /mnt/foo/bbb/someotherstuff/ > /mnt/foo/bbb/someotherstuff/file2 > > I am not interested in details which individual files were copied, just > the main directory. Is it somehow possible for rsync to only report...

No. If your ouput is a numeric "matrix", it cannot include alpha. Columns in a data frame can be of different classes, but each column must be single class. and finally, of course, see ?cat -- I think you are misusing it. If you simply want to return "somestuff", your function should be: function(w) {"somestuff"} not function(w) {cat("somestuff")} As usual, apologies if I have misunderstood. Caveat emptor. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking thi...

I just wanted to announce my latest plugin: LegacyInterop The 5 second video, minus the video, looks like this: $ ./script/plugin install svn://lirp.rubyforge.org/var/svn/lirp/trunk/legacy_interop $ echo LegacyInterop.act_as_dotnet >> config/environment.rb Done! Agile! Pragmatic! The plugin includes support for a large number of legacy systems, all using the "act_as" pattern.

...sync <400thecat at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I am copying /mnt/foo to /mnt/bar/ > > > > rsync --info=name1,del2 -rl /mnt/foo /mnt/bar/ > > > > /mnt/foo contains deep directory structure, ie: > > > > /mnt/foo/aaa/ > > /mnt/foo/aaa/somestuff/ > > /mnt/foo/aaa/somestuff/file1 > > > > /mnt/foo/bbb/ > > /mnt/foo/bbb/someotherstuff/ > > /mnt/foo/bbb/someotherstuff/file2 > > > > I am not interested in details which individual files were copied, just > > the main directory. Is it so...

Data and code as promised: #Creating a test dataset Year<- c(2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014) Lake1<- c(2, 4, 5, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2, 3, 1, 2) Lake2<- c(1, 3, -1, 4, -2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2, 3, 1, 2) Lake3<- c(1, 2, 5, -3, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2, 3, 1, 2) Lake4<- c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 250, 240, 240, 240, 240, 240, 239,

...0 21:58:29 GMT Gabriel Becker wrote: > Hi all, > > I can confirm this occurs for me as well. > > The one thing that comes to mind is that there are certain larger > expressions that contain calls to return which we absolutely don't want to > be an error, e.g > > if(somestuff) > return(TRUE) > > > That said, the actual expression Mateo pointed out certainly does look like > an error (it definitely isn't going to do what the developer intended). > > I haven't looked at the parser much, to be honest. I assume there is > perhaps enoug...

Dear r-developers- After many years of using and coding in R and other languages, I came across something that I think should be flagged by the parser: bug <- function (x) { return (x + 1) * 1000 } > bug(1) [1] 2 The return() call is not like any other function call that returns a value to the point where it was called from. I think this should straightforwardly be handled in the

...lt;gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I can confirm this occurs for me as well. > > The one thing that comes to mind is that there are certain larger > expressions that contain calls to return which we absolutely don't want to > be an error, e.g > > if(somestuff) > return(TRUE) > > > That said, the actual expression Mateo pointed out certainly does look like > an error (it definitely isn't going to do what the developer intended). > > I haven't looked at the parser much, to be honest. I assume there is > perhaps enough d...

...onfirm this occurs for me as well. > >> > >> The one thing that comes to mind is that there are certain larger > >> expressions that contain calls to return which we absolutely don't want > >> to > >> be an error, e.g > >> > >> if(somestuff) > >> > >> return(TRUE) > >> > >> That said, the actual expression Mateo pointed out certainly does look > >> like > >> an error (it definitely isn't going to do what the developer intended). > >> > >> I haven't...

...e HTML functions I wrote previously, David Dahl's xtable from CRAN, and then wrote a series of wrapper functions to automagically write the correct HTML for different datatypes. With this, you can write a report simply by doing: r <- report.new("My Report") report.begin(r) report(somestuff,r) report(summary(sumstuff,r)) report.plot("fit.png",somestuff,r) report.end(r) And it will write all the good stuff for you to an html file. I've included an example file report-test.r so you can see how it all works. Please take a look at it and send me your suggestions. Feel f...

Hi all, I can confirm this occurs for me as well. The one thing that comes to mind is that there are certain larger expressions that contain calls to return which we absolutely don't want to be an error, e.g if(somestuff) return(TRUE) That said, the actual expression Mateo pointed out certainly does look like an error (it definitely isn't going to do what the developer intended). I haven't looked at the parser much, to be honest. I assume there is perhaps enough differentiation of if/else that return...

...Hi all, > > > > I can confirm this occurs for me as well. > > > > The one thing that comes to mind is that there are certain larger > > expressions that contain calls to return which we absolutely don't want > to > > be an error, e.g > > > > if(somestuff) > > return(TRUE) > > > > > > That said, the actual expression Mateo pointed out certainly does look > like > > an error (it definitely isn't going to do what the developer intended). > > > > I haven't looked at the parser much, to be honest....

...te: >> Hi all, >> >> I can confirm this occurs for me as well. >> >> The one thing that comes to mind is that there are certain larger >> expressions that contain calls to return which we absolutely don't want to >> be an error, e.g >> >> if(somestuff) >> return(TRUE) >> >> >> That said, the actual expression Mateo pointed out certainly does look like >> an error (it definitely isn't going to do what the developer intended). >> >> I haven't looked at the parser much, to be honest. I assume t...

...> tapply(x,listOfFactors,vectorReturningFunction) > > My naive solution was : > > j <- tapply(x, listOfFactors) # get the product factor > answer <- tapply(x,j,vectorReturningFunction) > .... CODE TO GET THE LABELS RIGHT .... > ansmat <- array(unlist(answer), dim=someStuff, > dimnames=otherStuff)) > > > The 'flexibility' of being passed back different structures > (list, vector, matrix) depending upon the input structures > somewhat complicates the explanation of the functions' > usage. Uniformly returning a properly labelle...

...> tapply(x,listOfFactors,vectorReturningFunction) > > My naive solution was : > > j <- tapply(x, listOfFactors) # get the product factor > answer <- tapply(x,j,vectorReturningFunction) > .... CODE TO GET THE LABELS RIGHT .... > ansmat <- array(unlist(answer), dim=someStuff, > dimnames=otherStuff)) > > > The 'flexibility' of being passed back different structures > (list, vector, matrix) depending upon the input structures > somewhat complicates the explanation of the functions' > usage. Uniformly returning a properly labelle...