search for: someproject

Hi all, Just wondering about this: I''ve been dealing with classes/modules nested in several layers of namespaces. Here would be an example of a describe block: describe ClassOne::ClassTwo::ClassThree, "description here" do ... end What would be the easiest way to write something a little more terse, like: describe ClassThree, "description here" do ... end

...ifically, I''m able to call File.open on "public/images/somefile.jpg" and Rails/WEBrick understands that the path is relative to the home directory of the project. This means that "public/images/somefile.jpg" ends up referring to the absolute path "c:\ruby\workspace\SomeProject\public\images\somefile.jpg" The problem is now I''ve pushed this out to a Linux box running Lighty/FastCGI and I get the error Errno::ENOENT with message: "No such file or directory - public/images/somefile.jpg" I found that if I prepend the public with the actual path - s...

...atter too much. I’m happy with C or C++, but whichever (or both) or those are exposed in a stable way, we need the *users* of those APIs to help test it. How about we add a StableAPI directory in unittests? Then have a test written in C/C++ for each of the users of it. So a WebKit.c test, Go.c, SomeProject.cpp, etc. Then adding anything to the stable API must have a corresponding test, and changing the API shows us exactly which test broke, who cares about that test, and who to talk to about updating that API if we need to. If the only test which breaks is WebKit then talk to WebKit, if its Go too...

...ile fd=51 (file was closed ?) Mar 11 08:57:49 fileserver smbd[22536]: [2013/03/11 08:57:49.685736, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:158(linux_release_kernel_oplock) Mar 11 08:57:49 fileserver smbd[22536]: linux_release_kernel_oplock: Error when removing kernel oplock on file Bids and Proposals/2011/11-Nov/someproject/sol/Project White Paper - 2.1.docx, file_id = fd05:70045:0, gen_id = 3041820832. Error was Bad file descriptor My samba machine is setup as as a domain member of a legacy (win nt 4) type domain against a another Samba server that is running authentication. I have the following oplock options set...

...much. I’m happy with C or C++, but whichever (or both) or those are exposed in a stable way, we need the *users* of those APIs to help test it. > > How about we add a StableAPI directory in unittests? Then have a test written in C/C++ for each of the users of it. So a WebKit.c test, Go.c, SomeProject.cpp, etc. > > Then adding anything to the stable API must have a corresponding test, and changing the API shows us exactly which test broke, who cares about that test, and who to talk to about updating that API if we need to. If the only test which breaks is WebKit then talk to WebKit, if i...

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > I've actually got another, perhaps more radical, plan. Let's just get rid > of the C API or move it to another project. This simplifies a lot of the > plans here where people have too many different ideas of how the C API > should work. > > At this point the