search for: someerror

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "someerror".

2005 Mar 31
4
Transactions
I cant seem to find much information apart from the basics on transactions in rails. I have 5 nested transactions, and am performing the following basic operations: @whatever1.transaction do @whatever2.transaction do .... @whatever2.something = "foo" @whatever1.something = "bar" @whatever1.save @whatever2.save ..... end end ((( I had tried using
2010 Aug 26
2
Problems when Apply a script to a list
...gular and this causes execution of the for to stop.By this way I have only results until this problem happens.How can I pass over the execution for this step and have results for All other datasets for which function fun is applicable? 2) After some runs to my program, I receive this error message someError in sink("output.txt") : sink stack is full . How can I solve this problem, as I want to have results of my program for 1000 datasets. 3) Using for is the correct way to run my proram for a list Thanks alot Evgenia -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Problem...
1997 Jul 17
0
KSR[T] Advisory #2: ld.so
...vsprintf, but also try to stop false positives + * We obey the following rule + * + * If namesize < 256 keep + * If name from last / < 256 use that + * else use ELF_LDSO_IMAGE + * + * This ensures /very/long/stupid/nfs/path/we/often/get/foobarcmd + * comes out at least as. + * + * foobarcmd: someerror + * + * Even if we fix vsprintf to be vsnprintf (which we should), this + * ought to be kept to help make real size limited errors clearer. + */ + +static char *argv_remap(char *ptr) +{ + char *tmp; + if(strlen(ptr)<256) + return ptr; + if(!*ptr) + return ptr; + tmp=ptr+strlen(ptr)-1; + /* +...
2004 Jan 30
0
Error class names
As things stand now, the error classes are named along the lines of "Win32SomeError". I think it would be better to change these to just "SomeError", since they''re already under the Win32 module anyway. It feels redundant. It would be a minor API change, and I doubt it would be too painful at this point in the life of win32utils. Thoughts? If there...