search for: someclass

Hi everyone, I''m trying to convert a string passed on the command-line into an ActiveRecord class, so I can do something like this. a="SomeClass" a.find(:all) where class SomeClass < ActiveRecord::Base end This appears to work (better ways would be appreciated): a="SomeClass" b=eval a b.find(:all) However I would like to make sure this is an real class first, so I tried this since class names...

Does anyone have any experience making this work? I installed the plugin and tried the following: class SomeClass < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_Taggable end class SubClass1 < SomeClass end class SubClass2 < SomeClass end SubClass1.tag_with("tag") and notice that taggable_type = SomeClass when I do SubClass2.find_tagged_with("tag") a SubClass1 object is returned. Any help w...

Hi Accesses the $new method for a class defined in a package fails if the methods package is not loaded. I have created a test package with the following single code file: newTest <- function() { cl <- get("someClass") cl$new } someClass <- setRefClass("someClass") (This is similar to code actually used in the testthat package.) If methods is not loaded, executing the newTest function fails in the following scenarios: - Package "depends" on methods (scenario "depend&quot...

...RY=Polish_Poland.1250;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=Polish_Poland.1250 attached base packages: [1] "stats" "graphics" "grDevices" "utils" "datasets" "methods" [7] "base" > -b-e-g-i-n--r--c-o-d-e- setClass( "someclass", representation(v="numeric", l="character"), prototype( v=numeric(0), l=character(0) ) ) setMethod("initialize", "someclass", function(.Object, v=numeric(0), l=character(0)) { # strip the vector names cv <- v cl <- l name...

...I defined a class with two methods (myMethod1 and myMethod2). I want to call myMethod1 within myMethod2. Why does the code below not work? The name 'myMethod1' doesn't appear to have meaning inside myMethod2, even though the two methods belong to the same class.     setClass(Class="SomeClass",      representation=representation(       amount="numeric") ) setGeneric (name="myMethod1",   def=function(object){standardGeneric("myMethod1")} ) setMethod(f = "myMethod1",  signature = "SomeClass",  definition=function(object) {print(object...

...t don''t map to the database, and I''d like to put some of these in seperate modules. I''ve been wrestling with this for 2 days and can''t figure out how to get it to work. Rails seems to handle it fine for controllers, though. I tried creating a class SomeModule::SomeClass. I have a file named ''some_class.rb'' in app/models/some_module. I keep getting this: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.1.1/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:186:in `const_missing'': uninitialized constant SomeClass (NameError) So, I tried creating a file cal...

...SL code to puppet 2.7 style guide and expectations. I''m uploading it to github today for anyone to use. https://github.com/santana/puppet-cleaner Externally, you run puppet-clean file.pp and it can transform this: /* multiline comment trailing white space here -> */ class someclass($version = "5", $platform = "rhel6") { if ! ($version in ["4", "5"] or !($platform in ["rhel5", "rhel6"])) { fail("Version $version on $platform is not supported") } else { notice("Defining class for version...

Hi. I''ve done following things: >./scripts/generate model Someclass added self.table_name in someclass.rb with my custom tablename >./scripts/generate scaffold someclass And it logs out following : ''mybase_dev.someclasses'' doesn''t exist: SHOW FIELDS FROM someclasses ... It seems generator just ignores my table name definition... I...

...ned by setGeneric vis-a-vis methods defined by inheritance and polymorphism. setGeneric offers a 'clean' call to a generic function, ie. no need to call new(), so less typing to do for the user. But such explicit calls can also be avoided by functions like f <- function(x, y) new(Class = SomeClass, x=x, y=y). Then again, R relies heavily on method dispatching, so it must have clear advantages. *confused* Can anybody enlighten me? Thanks in advance! Cheers!! Albert-Jan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medic...

...large objects in R. Jens Oehlschl?gel # Wish no. 1: let [.AsIs return the class AFTER subsetting, not the class of the original object # Wish no. 2: adjust write.csv and write.csv2 for multiple calls in chunked writing # Rationale no. 1: a couple of packages will return a different class than SomeClass when subsetting with [.SomeClass # and still need to keep the AsIs property # Examples for classes returning different classes on subscipting are in packages 'bit', 'ff', 'bigmemory' # For classes where [.SomeClass will return class SomeClass, such a change will not hurt #...

I have a link to remote and I''m trying to get the name="" and the class="" attribute in the href so the link will come out like this: <a href="action" onclick"ajax(action)" name="Title Of Link" class="someclass"> So far the link looks like this: <% for course in @courses %> <%= link_to_remote "#{course.title}", {:url => {:action => "add_to_cart", :id => course}, :complete => visual_effect(:highlight, "schedule", :duration => 1.5)},...

Hello,   How can I generate an overview/vector of all the methods winthin an S4 class? Similar to dir() in this Python code: >>> class SomeClass():  def some_method_1(self):   pass  def some_method_2(self):   pass   >>> dir(SomeClass) ['__doc__', '__module__', 'some_method_1', 'some_method_2'] >>>   Thanks in advance! Cheers!! Albert-Jan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...

...something similar to edit a method of an S4 class. In other words, is there a fix-like function that allows me to edit method definitions without having to go back to the source code?   setGeneric (name="doStuff",def = function(object){standardGeneric("doStuff")}) setClass("SomeClass", representation(text = "character")) setMethod(f = "doStuff", signature ("SomeClass"), definition = function(object){     return(print(paste("***", object@text)))  }) fix(doStuff) # Does NOT give the intended result. How can I make R show the method def...

Hi all, Just wondering about this: I''ve been dealing with classes/modules nested in several layers of namespaces. Here would be an example of a describe block: describe ClassOne::ClassTwo::ClassThree, "description here" do ... end What would be the easiest way to write something a little more terse, like: describe ClassThree, "description here" do ... end

...ectation. Is there any better way of doing it? object = mock() .... klass = class <<object; self; end klass.send(:undef_method, "class") # I had to do this because Mocha utilizes "method_missing(symbol, *arguments, &block) " method. object.expects(:class).returns(SomeClass) ... And thanks for such a nice library. ------------------------------ Kurman Karabukaev Application Developer ThoughtWorks Inc. (312) 282 0231 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mocha-developer/attachments/20061122/fa...

...comes with no warranty, ## expressed or implied. ############################################################################################# @@attachment_config = [] @@validates_as_attachment = nil # adds methods to the class that is mixing the module in def self.append_features(someClass) @@klass = someClass def someClass.has_polymorphic_attachment(config) @@attachment_config = config end def someClass.validates_as_polymorphic_attachment @@validates_as_attachment = true end super end # may only work for macs. If this is giving you tr...

...t; Thank you, Duncan. > That's definitely a strong reason for inherits(), because often > in such code, you don't know in advance what objects will be > passed to your function. > > > On Twitter, others have asked "the same", arguing that > > "<someclass>" %in% class(.) > >> uses usual syntax, and thus looks less intimidating than >> inherit() and less cryptic than is() %-/ (<- ASCII version of the rolling eyes emoji) <ranting mode> The most cryptic of the 3 forms being by far: "<someclass>&quo...

...t involving S4. > Duncan Murdoch Thank you, Duncan. That's definitely a strong reason for inherits(), because often in such code, you don't know in advance what objects will be passed to your function. On Twitter, others have asked "the same", arguing that "<someclass>" %in% class(.) > uses usual syntax, and thus looks less intimidating than > inherit() and less cryptic than is() I think you should all use -- and *teach* -- inherits(.) more often, and it would no longer be intimidating. Also, for the speed fetishists: inherits() will typicall...

...enefits including: # more clarity in the API # a place to put meaningful rdoc # a potential formal plugin point 2. Change should_be to ONLY handle arbitrary predicates (not serve as an alias for should_equal): subject.should_be :empty => passes if subject.empty? subject.should_be :instance_of, SomeClass => passes if subject.instance_of? SomeClass etc... In my opinion (feel free to disagree), this actually makes these examples more readable. Consider these two: @bdd_framework.should_be_adopted_quickly #current @bdd_framework.should_be :adopted_quickly #proposed In my view, these read equally...

Hi, I''m stuck right now with a problem concerning error handling. I''ll try to explain the problem in short: In a controller class I have a method edit: def edit @some_class = SomeClass.find(params[:id]) end The record originates from a database table. What happens if the user enters a field that fails validation and I return to my edit page? I get the idea that th original value from the database gets reloaded all the time, but I want to see the value the user entered. I try...