search for: some_us

...is is just strange, Christian, did you already >>> run and if not, can you run it and post the ouputs. : >>>>> net cache flush >>>>> systemctl stop samba winbind >>>>> systemctl start samba winbind >>>>> >>>>> id some_user >>>>> getent passwd some_user >>>>> >>>>> [..] >>>> afs1:~# net cache flush >>>> afs1:~# systemctl stop smbd winbind >>>> afs1:~# net cache flush >>>> afs1:~# systemctl start smbd winbind >>>>...

I have two boxes on which I am trying to get idmap_ad (from xad_oss_plugins) to provide uid/gid mapping, and am getting the error: "Could not convert sid <sid of some_user> to uid" The story so far goes like this: Without the line "idmap backend = ad:ldap://<PDC's FQDN>/" in smb.conf, I can successfully do all of: #> wbinfo -S $(wbinfo -n some_user | awk '{print $1}')" #> getent passwd | grep some_user #> net ad...

...ougie dovecot: auth(default): passwd-file(migration at example.com,192.168.22.222,master): lookup: user=master_user at example.com file=/etc/dovecot/passwd.masterusers Nov 30 14:27:28 dougie dovecot: auth(default): passdb(master_user at example.com,192.168.22.222,master): Master user logging in as some_user at example.com Nov 30 14:27:28 dougie dovecot: auth(default): ldap(some_user at example.com,192.168.22.222): bind search: base=ou=Users,domainName=example.com,o=domains,dc=example,dc=com filter=(&(mail=some_user at example.com)(objectClass=mailUser)(accountStatus=active)(enabledService=mail)...

I'm trying to figure out how to cause rsync to create the file on the backup server with 700 permission and specific owner "some_user" (not root) I try to do it in several way with no success. The command I'm using is: rsync -r -t -v -z /dir some_user@server::module so that it don't copy permission It always give the files 744 permission, that mean that every on can read the file ! I want it to be 700. I try t...

...I can''t get at them via tmp.values, etc. I can iterate via each: tmp.each {|x| puts x.inspect } displays the contents. So it seems like I''m definitly trying to get at something in a manner that I shouldn''t be. All I want is to be able to basically do a x = users(:some_user) without knowing either "users" or ":some_user"... the first part is easy: self.send(@klass.to_s.downcase.pluralize, ....?). If I had a good way to get a list of names within the fixture that would complete the picture. Or is there some alternate way that I''m mi...

From the acts as taggable doc I seeTag Ownership Tags can have owners: class User < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_tagger end class Photo < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_taggable_on :locations end @some_user.tag(@some_photo, :with => "paris, normandy", :on => :locations) @some_user.owned_taggings @some_user.owned_tags @some_photo.locations_from(@some_user) but I would like to be able to do something like @some_photo.tagged_with("xxx, yyy", :from => @some_use...

...l files to a samba 4 (Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER) Users will stay in S3 for now. Samba 4 joined samba 3 with no problems. I rsync'ed all files and its permissions (rsync -a ...). But... I cannot find a way that makes S4 sees S3 users and groups in a "ordered" manner. "id some_user" returns "almost" valid data for some users and "id: ‘some_user’: no such user" for others. I say "almost" because not all groups for all users are returned. Example: S4# id jgarcia uid=10000(jgarcia) gid=100513(none) \ groups=100513(none),101094(5p6l3d1$),...

...lem. We want to move from UW-IMAP to dovecot, when users INBOX is /var/mail/USER_NAME and his folders are ~USER_NAME/mail/. In addition the host is an FTP server that uses chrooting in order to prevent users from accessing files outside their home directories. Our /etc/passwd line looks like this: some_user:x:1234:123:Some User:/home/./some_user:/bin/shell When i try to check mail on this host with this user i receive the following error message: Dec 1 08:21:11 server dovecot: [ID 935345 mail.error] Invalid chroot directory '/home' (user some_user) (see valid_chroot_dirs in config file)...

...Could not get the lock for EXAMPLEDC.EXAMPLE.CORP [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(221) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2009/01/21 07:08:55, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(318) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [some_user] -> [some_user] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 1] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_wrap_log(886) tdb(/var/lib/samba/mutex.tdb): tdb_lock failed on list 12 ltype=1 (Interrupted system call) [2009/01/21 07:09:09, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal(91)...

Uhum, i tested with ssh:  ssh XXX at FILESERVER  journalctl -f Jan 16 18:28:42 HOSTNAME  sshd[2250]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=IP-SOURCE  user=XXXXX Jan 16 18:28:43 HOSTNAME  sshd[2250]: Failed password for XXXX from IP-SOURCE  port 39896 ssh2 Regards; On 16-01-2018 18:25, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan

am in a bit of a quandry... I have asked postgresql-users list and haven''t gotten anything to work with... > > How do I change the owner of a schema? > > > > ALTER SCHEMA "public" OWNER to "some_user"; #? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-alterschema.html > > The docs explain this very situation. HTML documentation ships with > the PostgreSQL distribution and can also be found online. ---- seeing as how the above line seems to me to be exactl...

...> > Users will stay in S3 for now. > > Samba 4 joined samba 3 with no problems. > I rsync'ed all files and its permissions (rsync -a ...). > > But... > I cannot find a way that makes S4 sees S3 users and groups in a > "ordered" manner. > > "id some_user" returns "almost" valid data for some users and > "id: ‘some_user’: no such user" for others. > I say "almost" because not all groups for all users are returned. > > Example: > S4# id jgarcia > uid=10000(jgarcia) gid=100513(none) \ > gr...

Hi, Is it possible to request a new feature that will help out some of us doing many mirrors, that is each mirror has their own system uid for security puroposes, it would be of great advantage (to I'm sure very many) to have an option to "save as user" <some_user> rather than have the files/directories only owned by the mirror host side owner/group, or by root. maybe something like a --chown user.group Thanks

...I have just put in production dovecot imap and pop3 in replacement of courier in a setup of 700 accounts aprox. Dovecot release running is 1.2.16 in a Linux CentOS 5.8. Seems like some accounts are having problems dealing with message threading, as I read lines like this one in my logs: IMAP(some_user): Error: Threading lost Message ID ...and some of those accounts cannot even list the emails. I temporarily got rid of this problem deactivating threading on those accounts but I would like to solve it. I found a patch that seams to deal with this problem at http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2...

Hello, We're running Centos 7 with samba 4.7.1 and we have an AD on WS2012 R2, so all users and groups are already created on the AD. The idea is to logon with the credential from de AD to the samba file server. We configured the smb.conf, acording to the samba wiki, so this is the result: [global] security = ADS workgroup = MYDOMAIN realm = MYDOMAIN.COM

> On 06/09/2015 11:54 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > > The git daemon on zytor is now functional again, as I managed to carve > > out a little bit of time to dig into the selinux problem. Cloning git > > via either http://git.zytor.com/ or git://git.zytor.com/ > > > > However, the web interface is still broken. I'll see if I can fix it in > >

...o: http://git.zytor.com/syslinux/syslinux.git/commit/?id=<SOME_COMMIT> for example and among others. Some other _examples_ for automatic *redirection* (and there might be others): From: http://git.zytor.com/?o=age to: http://git.zytor.com/?s=idle From: http://git.zytor.com/?p=users/<SOME_USER> to: http://git.zytor.com/users/<SOME_USER> When starting with http://git.zytor.com/ : From: ;a=commit to: /commit From: ;a=blob_plain;f=<SOME_FILE> to: /plain/<SOME_FILE> From: ;hb=HEAD to: ?id=HEAD (perhaps this is different with other tags?) From: ;h=<SOM...

...0 @conversation.users.first.class.object_id => 36497930 @conversation.users.first.class.to_s == User.to_s => true @conversation.users.first.instance_of? User => false    # Wrong! This last evaluation is wrong, and breaks equality checks and expressions such as @conversation.users.include?(some_user) If I enable class caching, the problem disappears (but that''s not ideal for development). Maybe I''m doing something that breaks @reflection in association_proxy.rb? Any ideas? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed...

...---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp. C:\atest>type tst_win32_etc.rb require "win32/etc" include Win32 include Etc Etc::Admin.add_user( :user_name => "some_user", :password => "abc123def", :home_dir => "C:\\foo_user", :description => "random text", :host => "\\dbm-team-date", :flags => Admin::ACCOUNTDISABLE ) Etc::Admin.change_password("abc123def",&q...

...---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp. C:\atest>type tst_win32_etc.rb require "win32/etc" include Win32 include Etc Etc::Admin.add_user( :user_name => "some_user", :password => "abc123def", :home_dir => "C:\\foo_user", :description => "random text", :host => "\\dbm-team-date", :flags => Admin::ACCOUNTDISABLE ) Etc::Admin.change_password("abc123def",&q...