search for: solvability

Hi All, I''ve been trying to resolve the SSL issue as described on the link at the bottom. I understand the issue and I''ve tried to implement all the different patches (one at a time .. :-). However for most of them there are either files missing or code not found in the files. It seems this is due to a version difference in Puppet. The docs and patches seem to be for the

This below is not solvable with uniroot to find "a": fn=function(a){ b=(0.7/a)-a (1/(a+b+1))-0.0025 } uniroot(fn,c(-500,500)) gives "Error in uniroot(fn, c(-500, 500)) : f() values at end points not of opposite sign" I read R-help posts and someone wrote a function: http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/92407.html but it is not very precise. Is there any

Hello, After solving the other "low hanging fruit" audio issues in our Asterisk PBX, we are left with occasional cases of severe echo which we have not found a solution for yet. Our system: - Asterisk 1.2.0-beta1 - TE110P on a PRI - TDM04 and TDM40, but these are unrelated to current echo issues - Fedora core 3 - Echo canceller KB1 Most calls have minimal, acceptable echo levels. But

Hello all, I have the following problem. I want to insert blank rows in an data frame so as to make it comparable with another data frame with more rows. How can I insert these rows? If this is not solvable, then, alternatively, is it easy to delete rows from a data frame? Thanks for helping, Eleni [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I've been working on adding pdb reading support to llvm. This started as a tool for dumping info from a pdb (similar to llvm-dwarfdump), which has been checked in and currently has limited support for dumping pdb. There's still more to be done on the pdb dumping tool, but at this point -- to reduce duplicated effort -- I think it makes the most sense to start moving some of this logic

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Phabricator provides a way to set up notifications for changes to > certain parts of the codebase & you can then "accept" those changes > which is probably the right way to do this, but I haven't tried the > workflow myself. > > - David I currently use this and find it works

Dear useRs and developeRs, I am struggling with a simple but not obviously solvable issue. Suppose I have the following list of data.frames called 'tmp': a <- data.frame(a=rnorm(10),b=letters[1:10]) (tmp <- list(a,a[1:4,],a[1:7,])) It is known that all data.frames in this list have the same number of columns (and this is a good thing). I want to build a bigger data.frame

I'm trying to troubleshoot why our workstations have stopped dynamically registering their ip addresses in our AD using bind_dlz setup. It worked for a couple of months and now does not. I realized I have a basic question about how it is supposed to work. Do the workstations (after getting a dynamic address from the dhcpd server) contact the AD DC directly with the information? Or does dhcpd

Hello everybody, I''ve been using RSpec as a tool to create web applications for some time now, in Rails, and using plain Ruby with WEBrick as well. The tool suits my needs and the story runner is great. Now there are things that aren''t solvable on the web, you''ll need a _real_ desktop application for those problems. So I''ve toyed a bit around with various GUI

Hi Folks, I've just come across a kind of problem which leads me to wonder how to approach it in R. Basically, each a set of items is subjected to a series of "impacts" until it eventually "fails". The "force" of each impact would depend on covariates X,Y say; but as a result of preceding impacts an item would be expected to have a "cumulative

Dear All, there seems to be some strange influence of the Design package on data.frame. If I build a data.frame containing a Surv object without loading the package Design, the data frame is usable to coxph. If instead I just load Design and build a data.frame afterwards, the naming of the Surv object is different and it does not work with coxph. (In my real application I loaded Design to use the

I'd like to suggest a different direction which should accomplish similar ends. I think it would make sense to introduce an attribute: csecandidate. If we see a call-site "X" marked as csecandidate, it would imply that it can be replaced with any other call-site "Y" with the same arguments which dominate the call-site at "X". However, there are some cases that

Hello, I want to solve some two dimensional equation system with R. Some systems are not solvable analytically. Here is an example: (I) 1/n*sum{from_i=1_to_n}(Xi) = ln lambda + digamma(c) (II) mean(X) = x / lambda I want to find lambda and c, which R-function could do that task? Carsten [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 2 November 2013 05:59, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > I would be scared to enable SCEV AA because it's not well tested > > This seems like a solvable problem. SCEV AA itself is something like 30 lines of non-boilerplate code, and essentially does one thing (calls

----- Original Message ----- > > On Oct 31, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We currently generate suboptimal code for this loop: > > > > for (int i = 1; i < LEN; i++) { > > a[i] = a[0] + b[i]; > > } > > > > The largest problem is that we won't vectorize the loop because

I've built R functions to ``effect'' a particular distribution, and would like to find out if that distribution is already ``known'' by an existing name. (I.e. suppose it were called the ``Melvin'' distribution --- I've built dmelvin, pmelvin, qmelvin, and rmelvin as it were, but I need a real name to substitute for melvin.) The distribution is really just a toy

Hey guys, Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?) Any thoughts on skipping the "DW_" (maybe even the AT/TAG/FORM too) in the rest of dwarfdump? (skipping the AT/TAG (FORM

>> Switching to a clean built on r223853, it still gives me: >> >> ldr x8, [x21,#8] >> stp x21, x8, [x19] >> dmb ishst >> ldr x8, [x19,#8] >> str x19, [x8] >> str x19, [x21,#8] > > Isn't that correct though? The problematic "str" has been folded into > the "stp" instruction, so "x19 + 8"

> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:36:47PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote: >> I want to capture all SIP messages. >> >> I have about 30 hosts in about 6 colos. >> >> My first thought was dumpcap, but the output file name format bugs me. >> >> What do you use for long term SIP capture? On Wed, 31 May 2017, Daniel Tryba wrote: > What bugs you about the output

Hello all, I am trying to investigate if a path length problem is solvable at all under linux/samba. To my knowledge path length on w*ndows can be max 32767 chars and filename length max 255 chars. But linux (and POSIX) tell me that the maximum path length is 4096. So I would expect that copying some deep tree from w*ndows to a samba server might be a problem. And indeed we already saw such a