search for: solidify

...ion, _and_ we have > to plumb all of the work optimizing the intrinsic as well giving us a > situation where we've now split our optimization efforts as well as > the pain of maintaining an intrinsic that's useful for a single > target. > > I really think that this is just solidifying my position that the > intrinsic is a bad idea and that this should be done as later > optimizations. > > -eric > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc...

FWIW, like David Chisnall, we (Azul) have a problem with rewriting history. Our LLVM fork has O(100) changes diverging from upstream (though our branching structure is simple), and keeping all of that history is important. What do people think of having one (or a set of) merge commit(s) merging in the non-llvm projects that will be part of the new monorepo? That's the only technique I can

I''ve decided that I want to use more automated tests because I''ve been intrigued by the idea of BDD. I am new to using tests, so I''m curious if there have been any writeup on using rSpec. This is one of the only ones I''ve found: http://blog.teksol.info/articles/2005/11/17/building-a-plugin-on-rspec It seems that the benefit of BDD is that it makes it

Monolithic is trying to solve the wrong problem - it's that simple. Any discussion or attempt to coddle those who think it's necessary is a waste of time. #dictator As part of any potential migration, everyone involved must start to accept certain changes, (large or small) to the workflow. The big challenge here isn't technical, it's mindset. It's convincing any group of

Hiya everyone. I am currently evaluating tinc for use by my company's vpn needs and I would like some help/information about configuration of tinc and if it will do what I would like it to do. Hopefully some kind soul will help me with what I am trying to achieve. I am sorry if this is an inappropriate forum for this question but I am looking for people with some ideas on networking generally

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I finally got around to testing this approach (round tripping through bitcode in memory) and it works beautifully - and isn't that much slower than cloning. I have noticed however that the copy process isn't thread-safe. The problem is that in Function, there is lazy initialization code for arguments: void CheckLazyArguments() const { if

...n: a) Front end diagnostics - This is an area that needs some work to be decent, but it involves the front end querying the back end for things like register size, valid immediates, etc and should be implemented by the front end with an expanded set of target queries. We could use this as a way to solidify the backend api for the MS inline asm support as well and use some of that when parsing GNU style inline asm. b) Back end diagnostics - This is the stuff that the front end has no hope of diagnosing. i.e. "ran out of registers", or "can't figure out how to split this up into thi...

All, I have written a trusted execution module and would appreciate if anyone could help in testing. This module provides a functionality similar to NetBSD's verified exec mechanism. Once the design details of this security policy has been solidified, I will be releasing a white paper which describes the technical implementation in greater detail. The mac_chkexec policy logic can be found

> On Jul 21, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> FWIW, like David Chisnall, we (Azul) have a problem with rewriting >> history. >> Our LLVM fork has O(100) changes diverging from upstream >> (though our

It is very exciting to see experimental Windows support listed for 3.3. Is there documentation somewhere that tracks what works and what doesn't in this configuration, particularly for C++?. Otherwise it is difficult for those not actively involved in developing Windows support to know what to expect when experimenting. Thanks, Andrew On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Bill Wendling

...elf who enforce absolute organization have already thought about the need for namespaces in rails. Now I do understand this is an ongoing effort... to some degree. Controllers and routes, from my experiences work well, that being, under a Namespace::Classname convention. At this stage, we need to solidify a convention for namespaces with models. It seems the functionality is halfway there and we need some sort of closure on the issue. As it stands, the easy solution which many people has been using is to just prefix the class name with the "namespace". For example, class SecurityUser <...

I am breaking ground on a new project and one of the issues I expect to encouter is the ability of users to define their own columns. For example, one of the features of this application will be the ability to store information about people''s skills and then search for and schedule them based on this information. Since every organization''s needs are different, it would be ideal

On April 25, 2014 at 1:44:37 PM, Reid Kleckner (rnk at google.com) wrote: Thanks for the writeup! It's very helpful. On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: On April 25, 2014 at 10:48:18 AM, Reid Kleckner (rnk at google.com) wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: The sdiv operation in LLVM IR only

In response to this discussion, I've prepared the attached patch as an initial prototype for the LowerCall/LowerCallTo change. All of the information currently needed by the back-ends, and the extra information needed by the NVPTX back-end, is now wrapped in a CallLoweringInfo struct. The various SelectionDAG classes have been modified so any calls to TargetLowering::LowerCallTo use this

...dor machine. CentOS is very real my friends -let's talk hardware! Maybe we can help the centos project out by doing so. I have to say, i'm sticking with my own hardware choices, -so please don't view this as someone trying to get a hardware spec for free -the intention here is to solidify our own base as centos users, sysadmins. -krb

...es. There have been many additions since my last release. Fabien Atelier has been working on this with me and has added a bunch of great code. You can get it from here: http://http://brainspl.at/opensvn.csie.org/ezra/rails/plugins/dev/ ez_where/ This is a request for feedback. I want to solidify the api soon so suggestions are welcome. Here''s a snippet from the README: Welcome to the new improved ez_where plugin for rails. This plugin is meant to be used as a nice ruby like syntax for creating the :conditions part of an ActiveRecord::Base.find. We also add the ActiveRecord...

Thanks. This is going in the right direction IMHO. Obviously, please make sure you add comments to the data structure and convert all the targets first. Also, please don't forget to send an email to llvmdev to warn owners of all the out-of-tree targets about the ABI change. Evan On May 15, 2012, at 6:56 AM, Justin Holewinski <jholewinski at nvidia.com> wrote: > In response to this

I''m trying to scale up Puppet and am wondering if I can use Puppet in an odd way. I''m looking to use Puppet as an authoritative source for all the configuration done to a cluster. That includes fstab''s, modprobe.conf, etc. This reduces duplication. I''m using SystemImager on a cluster and would like to run Puppet during the install, so when the node reboots, it

...gnostics - This is an area that needs some work to be > decent, but it involves the front end querying the back end for things > like register size, valid immediates, etc and should be implemented by > the front end with an expanded set of target queries. We could use > this as a way to solidify the backend api for the MS inline asm > support as well and use some of that when parsing GNU style inline > asm. Yes, I agree about this, too. As an example, we had a discussion a few months ago about warning about over-aligned stack variables when dynamic stack realignment is disabled, an...

Happy April! [Contrary to the day, this is not an April Fool's joke. ;-)] It has been several months since the release of Clang 3.2. Now is the time to start thinking about the next release! The (very) tentative schedule is testing in May and a release in June. What This Means For You Now is the time to start thinking about which features you are currently working on and getting them