Displaying 20 results from an estimated 75 matches for "solidified".
2014 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: add intrinsics for safe division
On 04/25/2014 02:21 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>> In short, I agree with your observations that these intrinsics are not an
>> obvious slam-dunk compared to making the explicit control flow, but I think
>> that the intrinsics do give enough flexibility on the LLVM side that it
>> would be great if front-ends used them rather than rolling the control flow
>>
2016 Jul 21
3
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
FWIW, like David Chisnall, we (Azul) have a problem with rewriting
history. Our LLVM fork has O(100) changes diverging from upstream
(though our branching structure is simple), and keeping all of that
history is important.
What do people think of having one (or a set of) merge commit(s)
merging in the non-llvm projects that will be part of the new
monorepo? That's the only technique I can
2006 Feb 16
2
Rails, rSpec and BDD
I''ve decided that I want to use more automated tests because I''ve been
intrigued by the idea of BDD.
I am new to using tests, so I''m curious if there have been any writeup
on using rSpec.
This is one of the only ones I''ve found:
http://blog.teksol.info/articles/2005/11/17/building-a-plugin-on-rspec
It seems that the benefit of BDD is that it makes it
2016 Jul 21
2
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
Monolithic is trying to solve the wrong problem - it's that simple.
Any discussion or attempt to coddle those who think it's necessary is
a waste of time. #dictator
As part of any potential migration, everyone involved must start to
accept certain changes, (large or small) to the workflow. The big
challenge here isn't technical, it's mindset. It's convincing any
group of
2001 Jan 04
1
Large complicated VPN setup. (Help with)
...apsulate IP then it won't
work with tinc..
Basically I want to have an easy to manage network framework which will
work and allow me to add/remove connections as traffic demands change
etc..
I know that this wasn't the clearest question and/or explanation but my
thinking hasn't really solidified on the issue yet.
Feel free to grill me for more information about the setup, however this
email is long enough as it is for now.
Cheers
Tomas Doran
System administrator and systems developer.
Northern Principle Ltd
(0161 848 0440)
--
The views & opinions expressed in this email may not be t...
2013 Nov 05
1
[LLVMdev] Thread-safe cloning
...) const {
if (hasLazyArguments())
BuildLazyArguments();
}
void BuildLazyArguments() const;
I've worked around this by calling Function::getArgumentList() outside
the threaded code to harden it before the threaded copies. Are there
other lazy data structures that need to be solidified before threading?
Should I be playing it safe and put a thread lock around the entire copy
procedure?
In case you are interested, here is the algorithm I'm using to copy a
Module to a same (or different) LLVMContext:
if (&context == &other.myContext)
{...
2013 Jul 22
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add warning capabilities in LLVM.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Sorry, just getting caught up on an old thread. I haven't been involved in discussions of this.
>
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:
>> First, let me try to clarify my proposal, in case there was any confusion about that. LLVMContext already has a
2005 Mar 12
5
FreeBSD trusted execution system: beta testers wanted
All,
I have written a trusted execution module and would appreciate if anyone could
help in testing. This module provides a functionality similar to NetBSD's
verified exec mechanism. Once the design details of this security policy has
been solidified, I will be releasing a white paper which describes the
technical implementation in greater detail.
The mac_chkexec policy logic can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~csjp/mac/trustedexec.png
Q: What is mac_chkexec?
A: It's a mandatory access control policy which ensures that if the...
2016 Jul 21
5
[RFC] One or many git repositories?
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, like David Chisnall, we (Azul) have a problem with rewriting
>> history.
>> Our LLVM fork has O(100) changes diverging from upstream
>> (though our
2013 Apr 09
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
...second round of testing, we will need a third round. But we try
> to avoid that as much as possible.
>
> The last step is to package up the binaries so that they can be uploaded
> to the llvm.org website.
>
> And that's it!
>
> As May approaches, I'll send out a more solidified schedule for the
> release. I'll also begin warning people of the impending
> doom^H^H^H^Hbranching.
>
> Cheers!!
> -bw
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listi...
2007 Sep 13
7
Namespacing Models
Hello everyone,
Do you feel it? The little shiver down your spine when you think of
"namespacing" in rails? To some thats a common feeling, to people like
myself who enforce absolute organization have already thought about
the need for namespaces in rails.
Now I do understand this is an ongoing effort... to some degree.
Controllers and routes, from my experiences work well, that being,
2006 Jan 12
7
user-defined columns
I am breaking ground on a new project and one of the issues I expect to encouter
is the ability of users to define their own columns. For example, one of the
features of this application will be the ability to store information about
people''s skills and then search for and schedule them based on this information.
Since every organization''s needs are different, it would be ideal
2014 Apr 25
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal: add intrinsics for safe division
On April 25, 2014 at 1:44:37 PM, Reid Kleckner (rnk at google.com) wrote:
Thanks for the writeup! It's very helpful.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote:
On April 25, 2014 at 10:48:18 AM, Reid Kleckner (rnk at google.com) wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote:
The sdiv operation in LLVM IR only
2012 May 15
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH][RFC] Add extra arguments to TargetLowering::LowerCall() so targets have more context in which to construct call chains
...target's LowerCall method. Right now, the interface is a bit rough around the edges, but I wanted to get feedback from the community on what you want in this interface before spending too much time on it. This patch currently only addresses the X86 and NVPTX back-ends. Once the interface is solidified, I will update the rest of the in-tree targets.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Gohman [mailto:gohman at apple.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:28 PM
> To: Evan Cheng
> Cc: Justin Holewinski; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; Commit Messages and Patches
> for LLVM; Vinod Gr...
2007 Jan 17
2
Best Board Your Ever Ran CentOS On?
Hi,
Whats' the best motherboard you ever ran CentOS on?
---------
Don't read this unless you have lots o' spare time, and please, no
flamers or kook-jobs with wierd attitudes, this is just plain old
hardware as it relates to centos talk -no politic or mean folks.
Background (why I ask about centos-friendly hardware):
As I order alot of servers, I have alot of vendors telling me
2006 Jan 31
11
ez_where plugin updated features.
Friends-
I wanted to let people know that there is a new experimental release
of this plugin. I would love feedback on syntax and features. There
is now a full test suite with fixtures that covers all the available
syntax. Look at the test suite for more syntax possibilities. There
have been many additions since my last release. Fabien Atelier has
been working on this with me and has
2012 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH][RFC] Add extra arguments to TargetLowering::LowerCall() so targets have more context in which to construct call chains
...target's LowerCall method. Right now, the interface is a bit rough around the edges, but I wanted to get feedback from the community on what you want in this interface before spending too much time on it. This patch currently only addresses the X86 and NVPTX back-ends. Once the interface is solidified, I will update the rest of the in-tree targets.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Gohman [mailto:gohman at apple.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:28 PM
>> To: Evan Cheng
>> Cc: Justin Holewinski; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; Commit Messages and Patche...
2007 Mar 01
7
Local puppet
I''m trying to scale up Puppet and am wondering if I can use Puppet in an
odd way.
I''m looking to use Puppet as an authoritative source for all the
configuration done to a cluster. That includes fstab''s, modprobe.conf,
etc. This reduces duplication.
I''m using SystemImager on a cluster and would like to run Puppet during
the install, so when the node reboots, it
2013 Jul 22
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add warning capabilities in LLVM.
On Jul 21, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, just getting caught up on an old thread. I haven't been involved in discussions of this.
>>
>> On Jul 17, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:
>>> First,
2013 Apr 01
8
[LLVMdev] [Announcement] 3.3 Release Planning!
...something major comes up during the second round of testing, we will need a third round. But we try to avoid that as much as possible.
The last step is to package up the binaries so that they can be uploaded to the llvm.org website.
And that's it!
As May approaches, I'll send out a more solidified schedule for the release. I'll also begin warning people of the impending doom^H^H^H^Hbranching.
Cheers!!
-bw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130401/4a813916/attachment.html>