Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "software_binari".
Did you mean:
software_binary
2015 Nov 18
1
Intel SSD
strace -f -e open software_binary might help, but I have noticed that
Centos is not really 100% binary compatible in some cases.
--
Eero
2015-11-18 17:42 GMT+02:00 Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com>:
> I always tell vendors I'm using RHEL, even though we're using CentOS.
> If you say CentOS, some vendors immediately throw up their hands and
> say
2015 Nov 18
2
Intel SSD
On 11/18/2015 09:51 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> strace -f -e open software_binary might help, but I have noticed that
> Centos is not really 100% binary compatible in some cases.
CentOS Linux is not 100% bit for bit compatible with RHEL in ANY cases :)
CentOS and RHEL are built from mostly the same source code (we remove RH
trademarks and take out RHN update pieces).
But RHEL source code
2015 Nov 18
2
Intel SSD
I always tell vendors I'm using RHEL, even though we're using CentOS.
If you say CentOS, some vendors immediately throw up their hands and
say "unsupported" and then won't even give you the time of day.
A couple tricks for fooling tools into thinking they are on an actual
RHEL system:
1. Modify /etc/redhat-release to say RedHat Enterprise Linux or
whatever the actual RHEL
2015 Nov 19
0
Intel SSD
On 18/11/2015 22:35, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 09:51 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> strace -f -e open software_binary might help, but I have noticed that
>> Centos is not really 100% binary compatible in some cases.
>
> CentOS Linux is not 100% bit for bit compatible with RHEL in ANY cases :)
>
> CentOS and RHEL are built from mostly the same source code (we