search for: softgun

...ill try bootstraping LLVM for x86 again. If that works then I'll bootstrap it for ARM as well. You can also run the tests in a emulator. The timing won't be accurate but you should be able to catch gross speed regressions. There are several emulators available; the ones I know about are Softgun, QEMU, the GNU Debugger GDB and the ARM Holdings development system emulator. There is another one that I came across once whose name I don't recall. Some emulators emulate a full computer with I/O devices so you can run an OS on them. These emulators could then host the build and not just t...

...ill try bootstraping LLVM for x86 again. If that works then I'll bootstrap it for ARM as well. You can also run the tests in a emulator. The timing won't be accurate but you should be able to catch gross speed regressions. There are several emulators available; the ones I know about are Softgun, QEMU, the GNU Debugger GDB and the ARM Holdings development system emulator. There is another one that I came across once whose name I don't recall. Some emulators emulate a full computer with I/O devices so you can run an OS on them. These emulators could then host the build and not just t...

...ill try bootstraping LLVM for x86 again. If that works then I'll bootstrap it for ARM as well. You can also run the tests in a emulator. The timing won't be accurate but you should be able to catch gross speed regressions. There are several emulators available; the ones I know about are Softgun, QEMU, the GNU Debugger GDB and the ARM Holdings development system emulator. There is another one that I came across once whose name I don't recall. Some emulators emulate a full computer with I/O devices so you can run an OS on them. These emulators could then host the build and not just t...

Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:20:17PM -0500, David A. Greene wrote: > This seems excessive and unrealistic. We're never going to come up with > a testsuite that satisfies everyone's needs and doing so could well be > counter-productive. If no one can commit anything unless it passes > every test (including performance) for every target under multiple > option combinations,