Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "softgun".
Did you mean:
softdux
2011 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
...ill try
bootstraping LLVM for x86 again. If that works then I'll bootstrap it
for ARM as well.
You can also run the tests in a emulator. The timing won't be
accurate but you should be able to catch gross speed regressions.
There are several emulators available; the ones I know about are
Softgun, QEMU, the GNU Debugger GDB and the ARM Holdings development
system emulator. There is another one that I came across once whose
name I don't recall.
Some emulators emulate a full computer with I/O devices so you can run
an OS on them. These emulators could then host the build and not just
t...
2011 Oct 13
3
[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
...ill try
bootstraping LLVM for x86 again. If that works then I'll bootstrap it
for ARM as well.
You can also run the tests in a emulator. The timing won't be
accurate but you should be able to catch gross speed regressions.
There are several emulators available; the ones I know about are
Softgun, QEMU, the GNU Debugger GDB and the ARM Holdings development
system emulator. There is another one that I came across once whose
name I don't recall.
Some emulators emulate a full computer with I/O devices so you can run
an OS on them. These emulators could then host the build and not just
t...
2011 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
...ill try
bootstraping LLVM for x86 again. If that works then I'll bootstrap it
for ARM as well.
You can also run the tests in a emulator. The timing won't be
accurate but you should be able to catch gross speed regressions.
There are several emulators available; the ones I know about are
Softgun, QEMU, the GNU Debugger GDB and the ARM Holdings development
system emulator. There is another one that I came across once whose
name I don't recall.
Some emulators emulate a full computer with I/O devices so you can run
an OS on them. These emulators could then host the build and not just
t...
2011 Oct 13
6
[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM.
However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which
2011 Oct 11
6
[LLVMdev] ARM Qualification
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:20:17PM -0500, David A. Greene wrote:
> This seems excessive and unrealistic. We're never going to come up with
> a testsuite that satisfies everyone's needs and doing so could well be
> counter-productive. If no one can commit anything unless it passes
> every test (including performance) for every target under multiple
> option combinations,