search for: softboundcet

...n, similar to Pointer Checker in gcc. If yes, could anyone elaborate on the status and accessability to other researchers? And if any help is needed? Prof. Santosh Nagarakatte, the author of SoftBound/HardBound/WatchDog Lite, answered that he is not currently involved in MPX. But he pointed to the SoftBoundCETS prototype at https://github.com/santoshn/softboundcets-34 . Therefore, I was thinking about adapting SoftBound to MPX, as a drop-in replacement for gcc's PointerChecker. Could anyone comment on this? -- Yours sincerely, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii

...-xHOST -check-pointers-mpx:rw >>> >> >> Interesting, looking forward to reading your report! >> >>> >>> Note "rw" which stands for protecting read and write accesses. In the >>> future, I will analyze how different flags affect ASan / SoftBoundCETS >>> / gcc-mpx / icc-mpx. >>> I will also use a set of microbenchmarks/benchmarks (e.g., RIPE) to >>> test the protection provided. >>> >>> > SPEC2006 is well know so it could be useful. Especially 483.xalancbmk >>> > Besides, maybe you co...

...xact flags I add to the usual build configuration: > -xHOST -check-pointers-mpx:rw > Interesting, looking forward to reading your report! > > Note "rw" which stands for protecting read and write accesses. In the > future, I will analyze how different flags affect ASan / SoftBoundCETS > / gcc-mpx / icc-mpx. > I will also use a set of microbenchmarks/benchmarks (e.g., RIPE) to > test the protection provided. > > > SPEC2006 is well know so it could be useful. Especially 483.xalancbmk > > Besides, maybe you could take something that is not strictly a benchm...

...pages on a />>/discussion of the different approaches (trying to do science, you see />>/:)). />>//>>/Btw, I will target only deterministic memory-safety no-code-changes />>/approaches that protect against spatial errors (I will probably />>/include also ASan and SoftBoundCETS with temporal errors' protection />>/in the results as well). The only technique (except Pointer Checker, />>/ASan, and SoftBound) I know of is Baggy Bounds Checking from MSR, but />>/it seems to be closed-source and Windows-oriented. If anyone can />>/suggest some othe...

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii < Dmitrii.Kuvaiskii at tu-dresden.de> wrote: > I continue playing with Intel MPX and its support in modern compilers. > All experiments were done on the Alienware (Dell) 15 R2, Ubuntu 15.10 > (linux 4.2.0), gcc version is 5.2.1, icc version 2016.1.150. The > benchmark suite is PARSEC 3.0, all versions with 1 thread and default