Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "soft_fail_drop".
Did you mean:
soft_fail_drops
2007 Aug 29
0
Re: Soft failing deleting-type migrations
On 29 Aug 2007, at 03:02, Jay Levitt wrote:
>
> But I can see an argument that keeping the current behavior is
> desirable to ensure the correctness of a production system. So what
> if it were an option - SOFT_FAIL_DROPS=[none|up|down|both] - that
> defaulted to "both" on development, "down" on test, and "none" on
> production?
>
Or maybe on error it could offer the option to continue anyway when
in development mode ?
Fred
> Would such a patch likely be smiled upon by...