search for: socksify

...sifiable version of wine, and I see that this topic has been dealt with recently without giving the answer. Well, I decided on downloading a whole bunch of different versions and - for those interested - would like to tell you about my experience. ***The latest version which can still be used for socksifying internet applications appears to be wine-990326. *** I don't know whether this is the best version to use, and I found out that earlier versions worked similarly well, though they all have some problems with window redrawing and requiring to switch between windows (or resize them) to get bu...

...`ssh -D /tmp/socket $myhost` will actually provide a socks server listing on the unix domain socket /tmp/socket (this does not appear to be documented, though it is semi-documented for -L and -R). Do you know of any "socksification" script to go along with it, in the spirit of tsocks of socksify (from dante)? Those do not seem to support socks servers running on unix domain sockets. My ultimate goal is to use a web browser and various impi-utilities socksified so I can access a management network behind a login host that itself is accessible via ssh. Those tools only support IP-based SO...

Am Di, 20. Feb 2018, 23:13:16 -0800 schrieb Dan Kaminsky: > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:13:16 -0800 > From: Dan Kaminsky <dan at doxpara.com> > To: J? Fahlke <jorrit at jorrit.de> > Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: Re: Is there socksify script for dynamics forwardings to unix > domain sockets? > > Whoa. That's pretty cool. > > Empirically, how well do LD_PRELOAD scripts work in grabbing all socket > calls? Good point, I did not check that before, so I tried now (with tsocks on Debian stretch and the &quo...

Hi, I'm currently trying to setup a SIP connection to an external party true a socks server with socksify. Currently i do see the connection , and get a forbidden (that could be correct since i'm not authorised yet), but after that , it doesn't want to disconnect anymore. Also , internal calls (SIP to SIP) don't work anymore. Does anyone have an example (socks.conf) for this? Regards, R...

Is there any plan to add socks 4 or socks 5 support to openssh like the original ssh developed in finland?? Michael Michael at bizsystems.com

...ProxyCommand with the socks aware connect.c program to connect out. All works great. I discovered while trying to use the ssh-keyscan program that it does not use the ProxyCommand configuration. At least in my testing it does not return any information in this case. I also tried the Dante 'socksify nc $hostname 22' and I can get the connection banner. But 'ssh-keyscan -t rsa $hostname' returns nothing. Trying to run it socksified similarly does not work either. I have not looked at the code so I can't say for sure what is happening. This prevents it from being able to conn...

Hi I've been looking at a both openssh and couple of commercial SSH implementations(F-Secure and ssh comm.). The one thing I see as missing is the "nice-to-have" feature of FTP specific port forwarding. The commercial implementations allows a syntax of "-L ftp/<someport>:..." which does some "automagical" forwarding of the data channel "under the

...loat ssh. > > > I would like to say that I am one person that does care about ssh with socks5 support, and I would > like to see it stay in openssh. openssh did never include support for client side socks. you can use ProxyCommand for this: ProxyCommand exec /usr/local/bin/socksify /usr/bin/nc %h %p this commit message was about removing a simple SOCKS5 SERVER (yes, server) form openssh. openssh does still include a SOCK4 server. > I know there are people here who use ssh with socks5 support, and I want to convince them to use > openssh instead of whatever v1 version...

I've wondered if this topic has been discussed relative to enhancing the current capabilities of OpenSSH. Please forgive me if I don't use the exact terminology that you may be used to in describing SSH or Transparent Proxy operation. I continue to learn. Always... Here's what I mean: 1) Port forwarding through SSH is generally a configuration that is "port

...sh-unix-dev&m=94681757108109&w=2 Show that SOCKS support has been an issue for the past few months. Here are my questions: 1. Has the ProxyCommand been implemented, and if so where are instructions on how to use it? If no is anyone working on it? 2. Why was the inferior method of 'socksify' chosen over proper -lsocks support? (ie why was the Dante patch removed. It was useful) Think of deploying OpenSSH to a group of 300 people. If a person can be given one set of binaries which works with SOCKS out of the box that is much better than making them download and configure Dante as...

For what I can see there is no socks support built in in wine and also if u try to force socks tunneling through tsocks the windows program are not "socksifed". You can run freecap inside wine and then run through freecap the socksified program and this way it works, but I think it will be a nice to have feature to be able to run through socks. I've already implemented socks

is openssh going to ever contain socks4/5 proxy support (http://www.socks.nec.com/) the same way ssh (nonfree version) does? Without this support, openssh is completely unusable behind a firewall. Hayden A. James

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

...forwarding clients would be able to execute arbitrary programs on a remote SSH server completely retaining their TCP connectivity and network identity. If their TCP payload doesn't support SOCKS protocol natively, it can be packed into SOCKS requests with a SOCKS wrapper such as proxychains or socksify. Similarly, using remote static port forwarding clients can publish a single service on the SSH server. With remote dynamic port forwarding they would be able to publish their whole connectivity to all users of the SSH server or even to all those, who have access to a particular TCP port on the ser...

Hi, i added a native (client) Socks V4/V5 support inside FreeBSD libc library. The work is based of my project (see http://csocks.altervista.org) CSOCKS. You can get it here: http://csocks.altervista.org/download/FreeBSD_libc.tar.gz CHANGES: I changed the file: /usr/src/lib/libc/Makefile I added the Directory: /usr/src/lib/libc/socks They contains the files:

Hello! I was looking around for a solution which would allow me to un-forward already locally forwarded port but had no luck. So I decided to try and add it myself. I am not a good C coder, in fact, I've never really coded under unix before(it's just half a year since I fully moved from windowz). Here is what I made by now:

Since I use the Dante SOCKS library (instead of the NEC libraries), I decided to hack support for them into OpenSSH. Here is the results. Thanks, David $NetBSD$ --- configure.in.orig Wed Dec 29 08:37:01 1999 +++ configure.in Wed Dec 29 08:37:25 1999 @@ -334,6 +341,20 @@ AC_MSG_WARN([*** Disabling lastlog support *** ]) AC_DEFINE(DISABLE_LASTLOG) fi + +dnl Compile with dante SOCKS library

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Summary: [PATCH] Transparent proxy support on Linux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: