search for: socksifiable

A longer time ago, I already asked about the latest socksifiable version of wine, and I see that this topic has been dealt with recently without giving the answer. Well, I decided on downloading a whole bunch of different versions and - for those interested - would like to tell you about my experience. ***The latest version which can still be used for socksify...

Hi! I noticed that `ssh -D /tmp/socket $myhost` will actually provide a socks server listing on the unix domain socket /tmp/socket (this does not appear to be documented, though it is semi-documented for -L and -R). Do you know of any "socksification" script to go along with it, in the spirit of tsocks of socksify (from dante)? Those do not seem to support socks servers running on

Am Di, 20. Feb 2018, 23:13:16 -0800 schrieb Dan Kaminsky: > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:13:16 -0800 > From: Dan Kaminsky <dan at doxpara.com> > To: J? Fahlke <jorrit at jorrit.de> > Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: Re: Is there socksify script for dynamics forwardings to unix > domain sockets? > > Whoa. That's pretty cool. > >

Hi, I'm currently trying to setup a SIP connection to an external party true a socks server with socksify. Currently i do see the connection , and get a forbidden (that could be correct since i'm not authorised yet), but after that , it doesn't want to disconnect anymore. Also , internal calls (SIP to SIP) don't work anymore. Does anyone have an example (socks.conf) for this?

Is there any plan to add socks 4 or socks 5 support to openssh like the original ssh developed in finland?? Michael Michael at bizsystems.com

I have a network without a network connection to other networks. But a socks server is dual homed between it and other networks. I can use socks to ssh to other networks. I use ProxyCommand with the socks aware connect.c program to connect out. All works great. I discovered while trying to use the ssh-keyscan program that it does not use the ProxyCommand configuration. At least in my testing

Hi I've been looking at a both openssh and couple of commercial SSH implementations(F-Secure and ssh comm.). The one thing I see as missing is the "nice-to-have" feature of FTP specific port forwarding. The commercial implementations allows a syntax of "-L ftp/<someport>:..." which does some "automagical" forwarding of the data channel "under the

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Ault, James R (CRD) wrote: > I was reading the changelog from version 2.9 that was recently released, and I coudln't help noticing > this item: > > from openssh changelog: > > - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2001/04/17 12:55:04 > [channels.c ssh.c] > undo socks5 and https support since they are not really used and >

I've wondered if this topic has been discussed relative to enhancing the current capabilities of OpenSSH. Please forgive me if I don't use the exact terminology that you may be used to in describing SSH or Transparent Proxy operation. I continue to learn. Always... Here's what I mean: 1) Port forwarding through SSH is generally a configuration that is "port

I have checked the FAQ and the mailing list archives, but I haven't been able to RTFM to solve my problem. Thus turning to the dev list. 2.2.0p1 Changelog includes: 20000207 - Removed SOCKS code. Will support through a ProxyCommand. Relevant Mailing list archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=95803710921359&w=2 and

For what I can see there is no socks support built in in wine and also if u try to force socks tunneling through tsocks the windows program are not "socksifed". You can run freecap inside wine and then run through freecap the socksified program and this way it works, but I think it will be a nice to have feature to be able to run through socks. I've already implemented socks

is openssh going to ever contain socks4/5 proxy support (http://www.socks.nec.com/) the same way ssh (nonfree version) does? Without this support, openssh is completely unusable behind a firewall. Hayden A. James

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2393 Bug ID: 2393 Summary: Remote dynamic port forwarding for OpenSSH client Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.8p1 Hardware: All URL: http://d3s.mff.cuni.cz/~steinhauser/openssh.html OS: All Status: NEW Keywords: openbsd, patch

Hi, i added a native (client) Socks V4/V5 support inside FreeBSD libc library. The work is based of my project (see http://csocks.altervista.org) CSOCKS. You can get it here: http://csocks.altervista.org/download/FreeBSD_libc.tar.gz CHANGES: I changed the file: /usr/src/lib/libc/Makefile I added the Directory: /usr/src/lib/libc/socks They contains the files:

Hello! I was looking around for a solution which would allow me to un-forward already locally forwarded port but had no luck. So I decided to try and add it myself. I am not a good C coder, in fact, I've never really coded under unix before(it's just half a year since I fully moved from windowz). Here is what I made by now:

Since I use the Dante SOCKS library (instead of the NEC libraries), I decided to hack support for them into OpenSSH. Here is the results. Thanks, David $NetBSD$ --- configure.in.orig Wed Dec 29 08:37:01 1999 +++ configure.in Wed Dec 29 08:37:25 1999 @@ -334,6 +341,20 @@ AC_MSG_WARN([*** Disabling lastlog support *** ]) AC_DEFINE(DISABLE_LASTLOG) fi + +dnl Compile with dante SOCKS library

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Summary: [PATCH] Transparent proxy support on Linux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: