search for: socketnames

As far as I know this patch has no security implications -- I don't believe that allowing sshd to use get_local_name() (in canohost.c) on a connected socket to determine it's own fqdn will allow a malicious client (or router or dns server) to make it come to the wrong conclusion. But please let me know if you think I'm wrong. Please also let me know if you're just not interested

...tically, this probably means these drivers will not be configured in 'ups.conf' either and won't be seen. What we could also do, is to let the server checkout the contents of the STATEPATH and contact to all sockets it finds there. This would also do away with the necessity to keep the socketnames in the drivers and the server in sync. There are two caveats though: 1) Drivers must have created their socket before the server is started. This is not different from what we have now, but the server wouldn't be able to detect that a driver which should be running (according to 'ups.conf&...

RFC 4254 says, in regards to the "tcpip-forward" request message: Section 7.1 ... If a client passes 0 as port number to bind and has 'want reply' as TRUE, then the server allocates the next available unprivileged port number and replies with the following message; otherwise, there is no response-specific data. byte SSH_MSG_REQUEST_SUCCESS uint32 port that was bound

Hi guys I have a problem with Samba 4.0 shares covered by scannedonly VFS. Example configuration of one of those shares: path = /foo/bar/baz read only = No browseable = No vfs objects = scannedonly scannedonly:domain_socket = True scannedonly:socketname = /var/lib/scannedonly/scan scannedonly:hide_nonscanned_files = True scannedonly:allow_nonscanned_files = False Whenever I

Hi, if I connect from a winxp machine to my samba share and create a new file, it does not get the permissions specified by "create mask" and "force create mode" at first. Only after I modify the permissions on the client, the file finally gets the right permissions on the server. Thereby it does not matter what I change on the client, even if I remove all access rights.

Hello All, I'm trying to configure the scannedonly module with ClamAV on OpenSuSE 11.3 but it's failing to connect to the clamav socket and I can't figure out why. Clamd is running and the socket is has 666 permissions. I've increase "log level = 5", tried stracing the processes but nothing. Any thoughts on what to try next? OpenSuSE 11.3 samba-3.5.4 clamav-0.97

Hello I'm testing Samba 4.0.0 (latest stable) as an AD DC. Here is how it was build: lvmtest samba # sbin/samba -b Samba version: 4.0.0 Build environment: Build host: Linux lvmtest 3.6.8-gentoo #3 SMP Wed Dec 5 14:27:26 CET 2012 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Paths: BINDIR: /usr/local/samba/bin SBINDIR: /usr/local/samba/sbin CONFIGFILE:

Hello list, I'm fresh in using an ups for shutting down a linux server and i was thinking someone could give a hand at debugging a problem i stumbled to. I'm used to the redhat type of distribution, mainly centos 4/5, and off-course i installed nut and nut-client from the available rpm packages. After some reading i disconnected the server from the power supplied by the ups and

Hello list, I'm fresh in using an ups for shutting down a linux server and i was thinking someone could give a hand at debugging a problem i stumbled to. I'm used to the redhat type of distribution, mainly centos 4/5, and off-course i installed nut and nut-client from the available rpm packages. After some reading i disconnected the server from the power supplied by the ups and