Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "socket_ids".
Did you mean:
socket_id
2014 Jun 02
0
numa support question on centos 6.5
Hi, All
The vm can't start when using numa based on centos 6.5(kernel:
kernel-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64,
qemu-kvm: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.8.x86_64). My numa setting in vm
xml is the following:
--------------------
<numatune>
<memory mode='strict' nodeset='1'/>
</numatune>
--------------------
When 'nodeset' sets '0', the
2013 Aug 27
1
Finding out CPU topology
Hi,
I have been trying to find out CPU topology using libvirt.
I understand that I can find out the number of cores/sockets/
threads etc through getCapabilities() function. What I am wondering
is that is there any function that can provide me the exact topology
like how many sockets, how many sockets per core and number of
threads per core, if applicable or may be info about numa cells.
Is there
2013 Sep 17
2
Finding out CPU topology.
Hi all,
I have been trying to find out cpu topology using libvirt. When
I do 'virsh capabilites', I find this inside <topology> tag:
<topology>
<cells num='1'>
<cell id='0'>
<memory unit='KiB'>3908488</memory>
<cpus num='4'>
<cpu id='0' socket_id='0'
2017 May 23
2
Odd Virsh Capabilities response
Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we
threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling.
Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an
older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file
I got a core2duo when it should have been at least Penryn or something
(Xeon E5345)
Of course the VMs work fine with
2013 Sep 17
0
Re: libvirt-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 28
Test
libvirt-users-request@redhat.com schrieb:
>Send libvirt-users mailing list submissions to
> libvirt-users@redhat.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> libvirt-users-request@redhat.com
>
>You can reach the
2017 May 23
0
Re: Odd Virsh Capabilities response
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:03:21PM -0700, W Kern wrote:
>Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we
>threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling.
>
>Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an
>older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file
>I got a core2duo when it should have been
2013 Sep 17
0
Re: Finding out CPU topology.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:41:12PM +0800, Peeyush Gupta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been trying to find out cpu topology using libvirt. When
> I do 'virsh capabilites', I find this inside <topology> tag:
>
>
> <topology>
> <cells num='1'>
> <cell id='0'>
> <memory
2011 Dec 21
2
[PATCH] xenpm: assorted adjustments
...ic void signal_int_handler(int signo
set_xen_guest_handle(info.cpu_to_node, cpu_to_node);
info.max_cpu_index = MAX_NR_CPU - 1;
- ret = xc_topologyinfo(xc_handle, &info);
- if ( !ret )
+ if ( cx_cap && !xc_topologyinfo(xc_handle, &info) )
{
uint32_t socket_ids[MAX_NR_CPU];
uint32_t core_ids[MAX_NR_CPU];
@@ -461,7 +457,7 @@ static void signal_int_handler(int signo
if ( cpu_to_socket[j] == socket_ids[i] )
break;
}
- printf("Socket %d\n", socket_ids[i]);
+...
2009 Jul 15
0
[PATCH] rename for_each_cpu() to for_each_possible_cpu()
... to be more precise in naming, and also to match Linux.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
--- 2009-07-10.orig/xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/perfmon.c 2009-05-27 13:54:05.000000000 +0200
+++ 2009-07-10/xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/perfmon.c 2009-07-15 10:02:08.000000000 +0200
@@ -7313,7 +7313,7 @@ xenpfm_context_create(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(p
goto out;
/* XXX fmt */
-
2014 Jan 29
1
libvirt-sandbox question.
I hope this question isn't considered too off topic for this list, I am
trying to reach the libvirt-sandbox developers, but I could not find a
libvirt-sandbox specific mailing list, and it seemed to me that
libvirt-sandbox was a part of libvirt itself.
I am trying to port libvirt-sandbox to run on a CentOS 6.5 system. This
wasn't too hard but, I had to do the following:
I have used the
2014 Jan 13
2
how to detect if qemu supports live disk snapshot
Hi everyone,
Using the QEMU hypervisor, when a live disk snapshot is requested through libvirt,
the request can fail if the underyling qemu binary lacks the snapshotting
support.
In python, we have something like
libvirtError: Operation not supported: live disk snapshot not supported with this QEMU binary
I'd like to detect ahead of time if the underlying QEMU can or cannot do
2014 Jul 10
2
How to config qga to support dompmsuspend
Hi,
I tried to run domsuspend command on my PowerPC board but failed.
# virsh dompmsuspend sdk --target mem
error: Domain sdk could not be suspended
error: argument unsupported: QEMU guest agent is not configured
It seemed that support suspend-to-mem only from capabilities.
# virsh capabilities
<capabilities>
<host>
2011 Oct 25
5
[PATCH] pm : provide CC7/PC2 residency
...: [%020"PRIu64" ms]\n",
+ cxstat->cc3/1000000UL, cxstat->cc6/1000000UL,
+ cxstat->cc7/1000000UL);
printf("\n");
}
@@ -458,6 +462,9 @@
break;
}
printf("Socket %d\n", socket_ids[i]);
+ res = cxstat_end[j].pc2 - cxstat_start[j].pc2;
+ printf("\tPC2\t%"PRIu64" ms\t%.2f%%\n", res / 1000000UL,
+ 100UL * res / (double)sum_cx[j]);
res = cxstat_end[j].pc3 - cxstat_start[j].pc3;...
2012 Nov 05
2
[PATCH] x86/ACPI: invalidate BGRT
Since the image pointed to may (and generally will) live in boot
services memory (which we add to the global memory pool long before
ACPI tables get looked at), we should prevent Dom0 from trying to
retrieve the image data.
The alternatives would be to
- not add boot services memory to the global pool at all, or
- defer adding boot services memory until Dom0 indicates it is safe to
do so, or
-
2012 Nov 07
0
[PATCH v2] x86/ACPI: invalidate BGRT if necessary
Since the image pointed to may live in boot services memory (which we
add to the global memory pool long before ACPI tables get looked at),
we should prevent Dom0 from trying to retrieve the image data in that
case.
The alternatives would be to
- not add boot services memory to the global pool at all, or
- defer adding boot services memory until Dom0 indicates it is safe to
do so, or
- find and