search for: soaked

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:58:43AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On 2018-02-14 03:08 PM, Sean Paul wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > >> Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas Wunner: > > >>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:38:28AM +0100, Lukas Wunner

...a 1 or -1. In other words the sequence should look something like this. y = 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 ...... Can somebody please give me some direction on how I can do this in R. Thanks Anup ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast

On 2018-02-14 03:08 PM, Sean Paul wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas Wunner: >>> Dear drm-misc maintainers, >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:38:28AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: >>>> Fix a deadlock on hybrid graphics laptops that's been present since 2013: >>>

Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas Wunner: > Dear drm-misc maintainers, > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:38:28AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: >> Fix a deadlock on hybrid graphics laptops that's been present since 2013: > This series has been reviewed, consent has been expressed by the most > interested parties, patch [1/5] which touches files outside drivers/gpu > has been

Hi all, I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks to flip the switch. But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users to code against the high-level interface too. This will (almost, but see below)

...nel of type 'H323' (cause 0 - Unknown) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) == Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/2.2.2.2-086f5ac0' status is 'CHANUNAVAIL' ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather

...the correct syntax for making a single object subscribe to multiple objects. I have tried: => [nfs nfslock] => [nfs, nfslock] => [[nfs],[nfslock]] => [[nfs] [nfslock]] and none of them seem to work. Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you, -- Rob -- Don''t get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut._______________________________________________ Puppet-users mailing list Puppet-users@madstop.com https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users ___________________________________________________________...

...very easy way to get RMySQL up and running on win32), please let me know. As an aside, can anyone explain why it is not possible to keep that package in CRAN? I'm just curious about that, it's just for my own enlightenment. Thanks, Pete --------------------------------- Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > > See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can

Hello I''ve noticed that Lustre network error, especially LND errors, are considered as maskable errors. That means that on a production node, where debug mask is 0, those specific errors won''t be displayed if they happened. Does that mean that they are harmless? Do upper-layers resend their RPC/packet if LNDs report an error? When, in my case, o2iblnd says something like

Hello I''ve noticed that Lustre network error, especially LND errors, are considered as maskable errors. That means that on a production node, where debug mask is 0, those specific errors won''t be displayed if they happened. Does that mean that they are harmless? Do upper-layers resend their RPC/packet if LNDs report an error? When, in my case, o2iblnd says something like

On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 14:22 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > the only truly safe way to destroy data on magnetic media is to grind > the media up into filings or melt it down in a furnace. I unscrew the casing, extract the disk platter(s), slide a very strong magnet over both sides of the platter surface then bend the platter in half. How secure is that ? I can't afford a machine that

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of EGO-II.1 > Sent: den 9 februari 2016 09:00 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Utility to zero unused blocks on disk > > > > >> the only truly safe way to destroy data on magnetic media is to grind > >> the media up into

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:38:44AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:58:43AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On 2018-02-14 03:08 PM, Sean Paul wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:26:35AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > > >> Op 14-02-18 om 09:46 schreef Lukas

...} data_functions <- sapply(1:10,function(v) get_data_function(v)) (data_functions[[1]])() # prints 1, as expected! I have two questions about this: * Is this a bug in R? * Is there a more direct way to get the effect of printing v? Matt --------------------------------- Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I''m trying to wrap my caffeine soaked brain around has_many :through following along at: http://rails.techno-weenie.net/tip/2005/12/23/teaching_your_blog_model_new_tricks_with_has_many_through I think my models are a little more complex than what fits this narrative. I have a directory of members, each member can belong to multipl...

Am 30.06.2010 um 23:31 schrieb John Criswell: > > Stupid question: is making the getOperand() method of CallInst > going to work? For example, if I have the following code: > > void > method (Instruction * I) { > I->getOperand(2); > ... > } > > void method2 (CallInst * CI) { > method (CI); > ... > } > > Will method() still work

Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list

Gabor Greif wrote: > Hi all, > > I am almost ready for the last step with landing my long-standing patch. > I have converted (almost) all low-level interface users of CallInst to > respective high-level interfaces. What remains is a handful of hunks > to flip the switch. > > But before I do the final commit I'd like to coerce all external users > to code against the

Well I have determined that everytime someone logs in/logs out of a windows box in our lab *ALL* of the files in "My Directory" are copied from/to the file server to the local client. Needless to say this is retarded and needs to stop. The local sys admin needs to perform some windows voodoo to redirect this directory. Still this brings the mystery as to why smbd would take up so much