search for: snprintf

Hello, I've got the same problem like this one. Can somebody send the snprintf.c or other ways around please? Thanks, <------- snipped from mail archive ----------------------------------> I just email'd, from my other account, the snprintf.c that we distribute in PostgreSQL...its been thoroughly tested on all the platforms that we support, with Solaris 2.5.1 bein...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Here's what I get under solaris 2.5.1 (sparc) with gcc-2.95.2 and gnumake 3.78-something : bsd-snprintf.c: In function `msetup': bsd-snprintf.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function `getpagesize' bsd-snprintf.c:72: `x' undeclared (first use in this function) bsd-snprintf.c:72: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bsd-snprintf.c:72: for each function it appears in.) bs...

Hello, Simon > So far, i found no way to denote calls to the host function as aligned > or maintain stack alignment throughout the stack frame of the jit > compiled function. Further, the gcc front end (llvm-g++ (GCC) 4.2.1) > seems to ignore directives such as -mpreferred-stack-boundary. Mike is right. It depends on your subtarget: 1. If you're running stuff on Darwin, which has

...he value (%rsp - 8) is always a multiple of 16 when control is transferred to the function entry point. The stack pointer, %rsp, always points to the end of the latest allocated stack frame. << The libc itself assumes it in that way, and does no stack realignment. You can look for example at snprintf disassembly, that dumps SSE registers on the stack: 0x00002b4b13522b60 <snprintf+0>: sub $0xd8,%rsp 0x00002b4b13522b67 <snprintf+7>: mov %rcx,0x38(%rsp) 0x00002b4b13522b6c <snprintf+12>: movzbl %al,%ecx 0x00002b4b13522b6f <snprintf+15>: mov...

Hi all, i am trying to call an aligned function in my host application from jit compiled bitcode. The call itself is done using an absolute pointer to the function. The host application's functions make heavy use of SSE instructions and are thus operate on a stack aligned to 16 byte. If i call an aligned function in the host application from a frame running jit compiled code, the alignment

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > Is this our snprintf or one from Solaris ? Can > > > you try and track down why it's returning -1 ? > > > > Maybe Solaris' snprintf does not know about the %j modifier? >...

Hi, There is a severe problem with the db-1.85.4 library''s Linux port that can be found on sunsite.unc.edu under /pub/Linux/libs/db-1.85.4-src.tar.gz (sp?): This library contains a "snprintf" function which breaks down to a common sprintf, ignoring the size parameter. Obviously, this was thought to be a terribly bad work-around for C libraries which don''t contain an snprintf routine of their own. The consequences of this bug are obvious: Any program which is linked with...

...ike this one: /home/proger/dev/llvm/Debug+Asserts/lib/libclangFrontend.a(DocumentXML.o) (.text+0xc65): In function `clang::DocumentXML::escapeString(char const*, unsigned long)': /home/proger/dev/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Frontend/DocumentXML.cpp:107: warning: sprintf() is often misused, please use snprintf() I've done some conversions from sprintf to snprintf, please commit those. -------------- next part -------------- Index: include/llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h =================================================================== --- include/llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h (revision 117247) +++ include/llvm/...

Both of these functions are using strlen() to create return value. Cheers, Scott Rankin *** /openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c.orig Thu Oct 18 13:57:51 2001 --- /openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c Thu Oct 18 13:58:26 2001 *************** *** 632,638 **** #endif /* !defined(HAVE_SNPRINTF) || !defined(HAVE_VSNPRINTF) */ #ifndef HAVE_VSNPRINTF ! int vsnprintf(char *str, size_t count, const char *fmt, va_list args) {...

...-->make This runs for awhile and looks like it is working till ... gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DSSH_ PROG RAM=\"/usr/local/bin/ssh\" -DSSH_ASKPASS_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/libexec/ssh/ss h-as kpass\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c bsd-snprintf.c -o bsd-snprintf.o bsd-snprintf.c: In function `getpagesize': bsd-snprintf.c:70: `NBPC' undeclared (first use this function) bsd-snprintf.c:70: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bsd-snprintf.c:70: for each function it appears in.) bsd-snprintf.c:73: warning: control reaches...

...stem I am using has a number of patches, although I admit not having verified that it is completely up to date. I have found gcc 3.2 and gmake and installed them. - configure seems to work fine. (my use ./configure --prefix=/opt/trial/local --with-rsync-path=/opt/trial/local/bin/rsync) - it finds snprintf and vsnprintf but not C99 vsnprintf <snip> checking for vsnprintf... yes checking for snprintf... yes checking for asprintf... no checking for C99 vsnprintf... no <snip> - make fails <snip - all worked up to:> gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -I./popt -c lib/snprintf....

...644 --- a/usr/utils/ln.c +++ b/usr/utils/ln.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { - int c, s, f; + int c, s, f, len; char *p; struct stat sb; @@ -56,10 +56,20 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) p = strrchr(argv[c], '/'); p++; - if (S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) - snprintf(target, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", argv[argc - 1], p); - else - snprintf(target, PATH_MAX, "%s", argv[argc - 1]); + if (S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) { + len = snprintf(target, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", + argv[argc - 1], p); + if (len >= PATH_MAX) { + fprintf(stderr,...

It looks like something got broken in openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c ... gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Dftruncate=chsize -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/includ e -I. -I.. -I../src/openbsd-compat -I../src/openbsd-compat/.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ../src/openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c In file included from ../src/openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c:72: /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i486-un...

Christoph Terasa wrote: > Since MS refuses to support C99, the common practice is to use either > > sprintf_s: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ce3zzk1k(v=VS.80).aspx > _snprintf_s: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/f30dzcf6(v=VS.80).aspx > > The former can be used as a drop-in replacement of snprintf via a > define, the latter takes an additional argument count which can limit > the bytes written to the buffer additionally. Hmm, the first can be...

...USER"); + char buf[PATH_MAX], *home, *p = getenv("R_PROFILE_USER"); FILE *fp; fp = NULL; @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ return fp; if((home = getenv("HOME")) == NULL) return NULL; - sprintf(buf, "%s/.Rprofile", home); + snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s/.Rprofile", home); if((fp = R_fopen(buf, "r"))) return fp; } Index: src/main/startup.c =================================================================== --- src/main/startup.c (revision 51208) +++ src/main/startup.c (working copy)...

...tl(lockfile_fd, F_SETLK, &lck); if (ret == -1) { ret = errno; DEBUG(1, ("%s: fcntl failed: %s\n", __func__, strerror(ret))); goto fail_close; } DEBUG(1, ("unique is %u\n", unique)); unique_len = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%ju\n", (uintmax_t)unique); DEBUG(1, ("unique_len is: %i\n", unique_len)); /* shorten a potentially preexisting file */ ret = ftruncate(lockfile_fd, unique_len); if (ret == -1) { ret = errno; DE...

[a bit unsure on if this is maybe better for r-package-devel] We recently added translations to messages at the R and C level to data.table. At the C level, we did _() wrapping for char arrays supplied to the following functions: error, warning, Rprintf, Error, and snprintf. This seemed OK but the use of snprintf specifically appears to have caused a crash on Windows: https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/issues/4402 Is there any guidance against using gettext with snprintf, or perhaps guidance on which "outputters" *are* OK for translation? Michael C...

>From Michele Cawley problem: tring to install on a HPUX v11 system. make install comming back with below error. Using LIBS = -lgen -lsec -lnsl Compiling lib/snprintf.c lib/snprintf.c:792: conflicting types for `snprintf' /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00/3.1/include/stdio.h:493: previous d eclaration of `snprintf' *** Error exit code 1 Stop. regards Michele ********************************************************************************...

I'm wonder if anyone happens to have a simplier (slower) version of bsd-snprintf.c. It seems NeXT 3.3 (unsure about 4.2) is missing mprotect(). If I could get something to replace that for a while and fix some of theses utmp in login.c issues I may have a rough port NeXT to black hardware.=) Thanks

This happens with GCC 7.0.1. The errors were all of the form: qemu-speed-test.c: In function 'main': qemu-speed-test.c:153:7: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=] usage (EXIT_SUCCESS); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ qemu-speed-test.c:155:5: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ --- builder/index-validate.c | 2 +-